Home Home | About Us | Sitemap | Contact  
  • Info For
  • Professionals
  • Students
  • Educators
  • Media
  • Search
    Powered By Google

Placement Committee Goals and Progress Report Form

 
Committee Chair Name: Mindy Bergman & Larissa Linton 
Date: January 9, 2008
¨ Goals Report
xProgress Report
 
Committee Members:
 
Goals and Results:
 
[Items 1, 2, 5, 6, and 9 might be of interest to the EC.]
 
(1) Placement Advance. Mindy is in the process of collating responses from current and past chairs about the transition to the 3 day conference. Goal is to have a draft by NYC meeting; finalized following the SF site visit in June. We need to work especially closely with Dave Nershi to see what effect the additional hours in Placement might have on Placement budget/profit.
 
RESULTS
 
·        Action taken in third quarter of 2007. No further action required. 
 
(2) Pricing of Placement. SIOP’s Placement is still a relatively inexpensive option compared to other conferences. (Liberty Munson did some benchmarking in 05-06.) We raised the price for employers last year, from $185 to $200 (per four postings). We kept the cost of job seekers at $40, because it is meant to be a “nuisance fee” to keep people from signing up just to look (although it does contribute to profit). Given the move to 3-day and any potential additional costs of further hours of operation, we should consider whether the cost of Placement should go up. Further, is this the time to raise Placement costs again (3 years in a row—the cost also rose in Dallas—and in another coastal and expensive site), or should we wait until a relatively less expensive year (New Orleans, Atlanta)?
 
RESULTS
 
·        There will be no change in the price for Placement Center in 2008. No further action required.
 
(3) Continue making connections with local area groups and international groups. It may not be tenable to see high participation from Europe in SF 2008; however, there are groups in Asia/Australia/New Zealand that we may be able to reach.
 
RESULTS
 
·        We made contact with I-O groups in Australia and New Zealand to promote Placement Center to their memberships.
 
(4) Use brief survey results from April 2007 to determine whether there are other ways of spreading information about Placement.
 
RESULTS
 
·        No survey was administered in April 2007. 
 
(5) Assign new Placement Chair before SF 2008 conference. It will be useful to have the next chair shadow in the Placement Center before taking on duties.
 
RESULTS
 
·        It is our understanding that the SIOP President identifies new committee chairs. We strongly recommend that next year’s co-chair is identified prior to the 2008 SIOP conference so that s/he can shadow the Placement Center before taking on chair duties next year. 
 
(6) Electronic (not physical) mailboxes for Placement? This is a question that comes up in our constituency every year. Is this feasible? Is it a good move?
 
RESULTS
 
·        We will not be pursuing electronic mailboxes, but we will be retaining the physical mailboxes. Explanation in the third quarter report. No further action required. 
 
(7) Determine whether there are jobs for committee members. Currently, Placement is 2 chairs doing the work. Does Placement want to expand its role? If so, some issues that have come up in the past:
            (a) Creating sample resumes on the SIOP site (a flash presentation) to give examples of what a good resume looks like, and also what a good resume for Placement looks like. [Some resumes do not convert well when uploaded into the database.]
            (b) Creating on-line presentations on good interviewing skills.
            (c) On-line presentations of what can be expected at Placement Center.
            (d) Increased communication with local groups to drum up interest in Placement.
            (e) More opportunities for members/affiliates to get involved, and also to create a pipeline of people who have experience in Placement and with the conference in general.
 
RESULTS
 
·        In the third quarter of 2007, we sent communications to SIOP members who indicated an interest in SIOP volunteer opportunities.  In the fourth quarter of 2007, we extended this search through our own professional networks. We have secured commitment from two volunteers, but are encountering difficulties in identifying at least two additional volunteers. We would appreciate assistance in extending our outreach to identify these volunteers or any recommendations from the SIOP Executive Board or Committee Members. 
 
(8) Continue with our usual business of updating information. Many of last year’s goals will again appear in 2007-2008 as we continue to administer Placement.
 
RESULTS
 
·        We updated the information for TIP and the Conference Program.
 
(9) Pricing of JobNet. Similar to point 2 above, is it time to change the JobNet price?
 
RESULTS
 
·        The SIOP Administrative Office works with the EC to set and monitor the price of JobNet. We do not anticipate any change in the JobNet price at this time.