Home Home | About Us | Sitemap | Contact  
  • Info For
  • Professionals
  • Students
  • Educators
  • Media
  • Search
    Powered By Google

Call for Nominations and Entries:  2010 Awards for the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Anna Erickson, Chair
SIOP Awards Committee

Distinguished Professional Contributions Award
Distinguished Scientific Contributions Award
Distinguished Service Contributions Award
Distinguished Early Career Contributions Award
Distinguished Teaching Contributions Award
S. Rains Wallace Dissertation Award
William A. Owens Scholarly Achievement Award
M. Scott Myers Award for Applied Research in the Workplace

DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF NOMINATIONS: June 30, 2009

All nominations must be made online. A portal for submission of online nominations and entries for the 2010 SIOP awards will be available through the SIOP Web site starting in May. 

Nomination Guidelines and Criteria

Distinguished Professional Contributions, Distinguished Scientific Contributions, Distinguished Service Contributions, Distinguished Early Career Contributions, and Distinguished Teaching Contributions Awards

1. Nominations may be submitted by any member of SIOP, the American Psychological Association, the Association for Psychological Science, or by any person who is sponsored by a member of one of these organizations. Self-nominations are welcome.

2. Only members of SIOP may be nominated for the award.

3. A current vita of the nominee should accompany the letter of nomination. In addition, the nominator should include materials that illustrate the contributions of the nominee. Supporting letters may be included as part of the nomination packet. The number of supporting letters (not counting the nominating letter) for any given nomination should be between a minimum of three and a maximum of five.

4. Nominees who are nonrecipients of the Distinguished Scientific Contributions Award, Distinguished Professional Contributions Award, and Distinguished Service Contributions Award will be reconsidered annually for 2 years after their initial nomination.

5. Letters of nomination, vita, and all supporting letters (including at least three and no more than five) or materials must be submitted online by June 30, 2009.

6. The Distinguished Professional Contributions, Distinguished Scientific Contributions, Distinguished Service Contributions, and Distinguished Teaching Contributions Awards are intended to recognize a lifetime of achievement in each of their respective areas.

Administrative Procedures

1. The SIOP Awards Committee will review the letters of nomination and all supporting materials of all nominees and make a recommendation concerning one or more nominees to the SIOP Executive Committee. Two or more nominees may be selected if their contributions are similarly distinguished.

2. The Executive Committee may either endorse or reject the recommendations of the Awards Committee but may not substitute a nominee of its own.

3. In the absence of a nominee who is deemed deserving of the award by both the Awards Committee and the Executive Committee, the award may be withheld.

Distinguished Professional Contributions Award

In recognition of outstanding contributions to the practice of industrial and organizational psychology.

The award is given to an individual who has developed, refined, and implemented practices, procedures, and methods that have had a major impact on both people in organizational settings and the profession of I-O psychology. The contributions of the individual should have advanced the profession by increasing the effectiveness of I-O psychologists working in business, industry, government, and other organizational settings.

The recipient of the award is given a plaque and a cash prize of $1,500. In addition, the recipient is invited to give an address, related to his or her contributions, at the subsequent meeting of SIOP.

Criteria for the Award

The letter of nomination should address the following points:

1. The general nature of the nominee’s contributions to the practice of I-O psychology.

2. The contributions that the nominee has made to either (a) the development of practices, procedures, and methods; or (b) the implementation of practices, procedures, and methods. If appropriate, contributions of both types should be noted.

3. If relevant, the extent to which there is scientifically sound evidence to support the effectiveness of the relevant practices, procedures, and methods of the nominee.

4. The impact of the nominee’s contributions on the practice of I-O psychology.

5. The stature of the nominee as a practitioner vis-à-vis other prominent practitioners in the field of I-O psychology.

6. The evidence or documentation that is available to support the contributions of the nominee. Nominators should provide more than mere testimonials about the impact of a nominee’s professional contributions.

7. The extent to which the nominee has disseminated information about his or her methods, procedures, and practices through publications, presentations, workshops, and so forth. The methods, procedures, and practices must be both available to and utilized by other practicing I-O psychologists.

8. The organizational setting(s) of the nominee’s work (industry, government, academia, etc.) will not be a factor in selecting a winner of the award.

9.  This award is intended to recognize a lifetime of contributions to the profession of I-O psychology.

Distinguished Scientific Contributions Award

In recognition of outstanding contributions to the science of industrial and organizational psychology.

This award is given to the individual who has made the most distinguished empirical and/or theoretical scientific contributions to the field of I-O psychology. The setting in which the nominee made the contributions (i.e., industry, academia, government) is not relevant.

The recipient of the award is given a plaque and a cash prize of $1,500. In addition, the recipient is invited to give an address that relates to his or her contributions at the subsequent meeting of SIOP.

Criteria for the Award

The letter of nomination should address the following issues:

1. The general nature of the nominee’s scientific contributions.

2. The most important theoretical and/or empirical contributions.

3. The impact of the nominee’s contributions on the science of I-O psychology, including the impact that the work has had on the work of students and colleagues.

4. The stature of the nominee as a scientist vis-à-vis other prominent scientists in the field of I-O psychology.

5.  This award is intended to recognize a lifetime of achievement.

Distinguished Service Contributions Award

In recognition of sustained, significant, and outstanding service to the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

This award is given for sustained, significant, and outstanding service to SIOP. Service contributions can be made in a variety of ways which include but are not limited to serving as (a) an elected officer of the Society, (b) the chair of a standing or ad hoc committee of the Society, (c) a member of a standing or ad hoc committee of the Society, and (d) a formal representative of the Society to other organizations. The recipient is given a plaque and cash prize of $1,500.

Criteria for the Award

The letter of nomination should address the nature and quality of the nominee’s service contributions. A detailed history of the individual’s service-oriented contributions should be provided. It should specify:

1. The offices held by the nominee.

2. The duration of his or her service in each such office.

3. The significant achievements of the nominee while an incumbent in each office.

4.  This award is intended to recognize a lifetime of service.

Distinguished Early Career Contributions Award

In recognition of distinguished early career contributions to the science or practice of industrial and organizational psychology.

This award is given to an individual who has made distinguished contributions to the science and/or practice of I-O psychology within seven (7) years of receiving the PhD degree. In order to be considered for the 2010 award, nominees must have defended their dissertation no earlier than 2003. The setting in which the nominee has made the contributions (i.e., academia, government, industry) is not relevant.

The recipient of the award is given a plaque and a cash prize of $1,500. In addition, the recipient is invited to give an address that relates to his or her contribution at the subsequent meeting of SIOP.

Criteria for the Award

The letter of nomination should address the following issues:

1. The general nature of the nominee’s contributions to science and/or practice.

2. The most important contributions to science and/or practice.

3. The impact of the nominee’s contribution on the science and/or practice of I-O psychology, including the impact that the work has had on the work of students and colleagues.

4. The status of the nominee as a scientist and/or practitioner vis-à-vis other prominent scientists and/or practitioners in the field of I-O psychology.

5. Although the number of publications is an important consideration, it is not the only one. An equally important criteria is the quality of the publications and their impact on the field of I-O psychology.

6. Documentation should be provided that indicates that the nominee received his or her PhD degree no earlier than 2003.

Distinguished Teaching Contributions Award

In recognition of SIOP members who demonstrate a sustained record of excellence in teaching, as revealed by excellence in the classroom or via Web-based teaching, student development, and community service via teaching.

The annual award will be given to an individual who has sustained experience in a full-time university/college tenure-track or tenured position(s) requiring substantial teaching responsibilities. There is no restriction on the specific courses taught, only that the courses concern perspectives or applications of industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology. Nominations of individuals whose primary responsibilities lie in teaching undergraduates and terminal master’s students are encouraged.

The recipient of the award is given a plaque and a cash prize of $1,500. In addition, the recipient is invited to give an address that relates to his or her contribution at the subsequent meeting of SIOP.

Criteria for Evaluation of Teaching

Although evidence of teaching excellence is likely to come from the total of all courses that one teaches, evidence of excellence in teaching I-O psychology courses or related areas is expected. The criteria are flexible and may involve the following:

1. Demonstration of excellence in teaching. Evidence for this might include course syllabi, lesson outlines, a statement of teaching philosophy, some form of student evaluation criteria (e.g., ratings) or receiving an award for teaching, examples of innovative methods in the design and delivery of course content, a summary of courses taught within the last 3 years (include title and short description of course, along with number of students enrolled), descriptions of textbooks written, course handouts, letters from supervisor(s) or colleagues, and up to three letters of support from students.

2. Demonstration of student accomplishments. Evidence for this would include papers or projects completed by students, students presenting papers at professional meetings or students subsequently publishing their work done with the teacher, stimulation of student research, awards or grants received by students, students pursuing further graduate work, successful placement of students in jobs or graduate programs, careers or internships achieved by students, and other student-oriented activities (e.g., undergraduate student accomplishments will be highly valued).

3. Demonstration of excellence in teaching-related professional activities. Evidence for this might include publications of articles on teaching, memberships in teaching organizations, teaching awards and other forms of prior recognition, community presentations about topics related to industrial and organizational psychology, and attendance at professional meetings or workshops relevant to teaching.

The nomination should include (a) a current curriculum vitae, (b) a short biography, and (c) a maximum of 10 additional supporting documents, addressing the criteria above. 
 

Administration Procedures

1. A subcommittee (eight members) of the SIOP Awards Committee will review the nominations. At least four members shall work at colleges or universities focused primarily on undergraduate or master’s level education.

2. The subcommittee will make a recommendation about the winning nomination to the SIOP Awards Committee, which will transmit the recommendation to the SIOP Executive Committee. If appropriate, nominators of any meritorious nonwinning candidate will be contacted to encourage renominating his/her candidate for the next year’s deliberations.

M. Scott Myers Award for Applied Research in the Workplace

In recognition of a project or product representing an outstanding example of the practice of industrial and organizational psychology in the workplace.

This annual award, honoring M. Scott Myers, will be given to an individual practitioner or team of practitioners who have developed and conducted/applied a specific project or product representing an example of outstanding practice of I-O psychology in the workplace (i.e., business, industry, government). Projects must have been conducted in the workplace within the last 40 years and cover a time period of no more than 8 years. Products (e.g., tests, questionnaires, videos, software, but not books or articles) must be used in the workplace and developed within the last 40 years. Projects or products may be in any area of I-O psychology (e.g., compensation, employee relations, equal employment opportunity, human factors, job analysis, job design, organizational development, organizational behavior, leadership, position classification, safety, selection, training).

The award recipient(s) will receive a plaque commemorating the achievement, a cash prize of $1,500 and an invitation to make a presentation at the annual conference of SIOP. Team awards will be shared among the members of the team.

Criteria for Evaluation of Projects or Products

Nominations will be evaluated on the extent to which they:

1. Have a sound technical/scientific basis.

2. Advance objectives of clients/users.

3. Promote full use of human potential.

4. Comply with applicable psychological, legal, and ethical standards.

5. Improve the acceptance of I-O psychology in the workplace.

6. Show innovation and excellence.

Guidelines for Submission of Projects or Products

1. Nominations may be submitted by any member of SIOP. Self-nominations are welcome.

2. Individuals or teams may be nominated. Each individual nominee must be a current member of the Society. If a team is nominated, at least one of the team members must be a current member of the Society, and each team member must have made a significant contribution to the project or product.

3. Each nomination must contain the following information:

a. A letter of nomination which explains how the project or product meets the six evaluation criteria above.
b. A technical report which describes the project or product in detail. This may be an existing report.
c. A description of any formal complaints of a legal or ethical nature which have been made regarding the project or product.
d. A list of three client references who may be contacted by the Myers Award Subcommittee regarding the project or product.
e. (Optional) Up to 6 additional documents that may be helpful for evaluating the nomination (e.g., a sample of the product, technical manuals, independent evaluations).

4. If appropriate, nominators of highly rated nonwinning candidates will be contacted to encourage renomination of a candidate for up to 3 years.

5. The Awards Committee will maintain the confidentiality of secure materials.

6.  Nominations must be submitted online by June 30, 2009.

Administrative Procedures

1. Nomination materials will be reviewed by a subcommittee of the SIOP Awards Committee, consisting of at least three members, all of whom work primarily as I-O practitioners.

2. The Awards Committee will make a recommendation to the SIOP Executive Committee about the award-winning project or product.

3. The Executive Committee may either accept or reject the recommendation of the Awards Committee but may not substitute a nominee of its own.

4. In the absence of a nominee that is deemed deserving of the award by both the Awards Committee and the Executive Committee, the award may be withheld.

William A. Owens Scholarly Achievement Award

In recognition of the best publication (appearing in a refereed journal) in the field of industrial and organizational psychology during the past full year (2008).

This annual award, honoring William A. Owens, is given to the author(s) of the publication in a refereed journal judged to have the highest potential to significantly impact the field of I-O psychology. There is no restriction on the specific journals in which the publication appears, only that the journal be refereed and that the publication concerns a topic of relevance to the field of I-O psychology. Only publications with a 2008 publication date will be considered.

The author(s) of the best publication is (are) awarded a plaque and a $1,500 cash prize (to be split in the case of multiple authors).

Criteria for Evaluation of Publications

Publications will be evaluated in terms of the following criteria:

1. The degree to which the research addresses a phenomenon that is of significance to the field of I-O psychology.

2. The potential impact or significance of the publication to the field of
I-O psychology.

3. The degree to which the research displays technical adequacy, including issues of internal validity, external validity, appropriate methodology, appropriate statistical analysis, comprehensiveness of review (if the publication is a literature review), and so forth.

Guidelines for Submission of Publications

1. Publications may be submitted by any member of SIOP, the American Psychological Society, the Association for Psychological Science, or by any person who is sponsored by a member of one of these organizations. Self- and other nominations are welcome. The Owens Award Subcommittee may also generate nominations. Those evaluating the publications will be blind to the source of the nomination.

2. Publications having multiple authors are acceptable.

3. Publications must be submitted online by June 30, 2009.

Administrative Procedures

1. Publications will be reviewed by a subcommittee of the Awards Committee of SIOP, consisting of at least six members.

2. The Awards Committee will make a recommendation to the Executive Committee of SIOP about the award-winning publication and, if appropriate, a publication deserving honorable mention status.

3. The Executive Committee may either endorse or reject the recommendations of the Awards Committee, but may not substitute a nominee of its own.

4. In the absence of a publication that is deemed deserving of the award by both the Awards Committee and the Executive Committee, the award may be withheld.

S. Rains Wallace Dissertation Research Award

In recognition of the best doctoral dissertation research in the field of industrial and organizational psychology.

This award is given to the person who completes the best doctoral dissertation research germane to the field of I-O psychology. The winning dissertation research should demonstrate the use of research methods that are both rigorous and creative. The winner of the award will receive a plaque, a cash prize of $1,000, and the opportunity to present their dissertation research in a poster session at the next meeting of SIOP.

Criteria for Evaluation and Submissions

Dissertation summaries will be evaluated in terms of the following criteria:

1. The degree to which the research addresses a phenomenon that is of significance to the field of I-O psychology.

2. The extent to which the research shows appropriate consideration of relevant theoretical and empirical literature. This should be reflected in both the formulation of hypotheses tested and the selection of methods used in their testing.

3. The degree to which the research has produced findings that have high levels of validity (i.e., internal, external, construct, and statistical conclusion). The setting of the proposed research is of lesser importance than its ability to yield highly valid conclusions about a real-world phenomenon of relevance to the field of I-O psychology. Thus, the methods of the research (including subjects, procedures, measures, manipulations, and data analytic strategies) should be specified in sufficient detail to allow for an assessment of the capacity of the proposed research to yield valid inferences.

4. The extent to which the author (a) offers reasonable interpretations of the results of his or her research, (b) draws appropriate inferences about the theoretical and applied implications of the same results, and (c) suggests promising directions for future research.

5. The degree to which the research yields information that is both practically and theoretically relevant and important.

6. The extent to which ideas in the proposal are logically, succinctly, and clearly presented.

Guidelines for Submission of Proposal

1. Entries may be submitted only by individuals who are endorsed (sponsored) by a member of SIOP, the Association for Psychological Science, or the American Psychological Association.

2. Each entrant should submit a copy of their paper (not to exceed 30 pages of double-spaced text) based on his or her dissertation. The name of the entrant, institutional affiliation, current mailing address, and phone number should appear only on the title page of the paper.

3. Papers are limited to a maximum of 30 double-spaced pages. This limit includes the title page, abstract, text, tables, figures, and appendices. However, it excludes references.

4. Papers should be prepared in accord with the guidelines provided in the fifth edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. Note, however, that the abstract may contain up to 300 words.

5. The paper must be based on a dissertation that was accepted by the graduate college 2 years or less before June 20, 2009, with the stipulation that an entrant may only submit once.

6. The entrant must provide a letter from his or her dissertation chair that specifies the date of acceptance of the dissertation by the graduate school of the institution and that the submission adequately represents all aspects of the completed dissertation. In addition, the entrant must provide a letter of endorsement from a member of SIOP, the Association for Psychological Science, or the American Psychological Association who is familiar with the entrant’s dissertation. Both of these letters may be from the same individual.

7. Entries (accompanied by supporting letters) must be submitted online by June 30, 2009.

Administrative Procedures

1. All entries will be reviewed by the Awards Committee of SIOP.

2. The Awards Committee will make a recommendation to the Executive Committee of SIOP about the award-winning dissertation and, if appropriate, up to two dissertations deserving honorable mention status.

3. The Executive Committee may either endorse or reject the recommendations of the Awards Committee but may not substitute recommendations of its own.

4. In the absence of a dissertation that is deemed deserving of the award by both the Awards Committee and the Executive Committee, the award may be withheld.

Past SIOP Award Recipients

Listed below are past SIOP award recipients as well as SIOP members who have received APA, APF, or APS awards.

Distinguished Professional Contributions Award

1977  Douglas W. Bray
1978  Melvin Sorcher
1979  Award withheld
1980  Award withheld
1981  Carl F. Frost
1982  John Flanagan
1983  Edwin Fleishman
1984  Mary L. Tenopyr
1985  Delmar L. Landen
1986  Paul W.Thayer
1987  Paul Sparks
1988  Herbert H. Meyer
1989  William C. Byham
1990  P. Richard Jeanneret
1991  Charles H. Lawshe 
1992  Gerald V. Barrett

1993  Award withheld 
1994  Patricia J. Dyer 
1995  Allen I. Kraut
1996  Erich Prien
1997  John Hinrichs 
1998  Gary P. Latham
1999  Lowell Hellervik 
2000  Joseph L. Moses
2001  David P. Campbell
2002  George C. Thornton III
2003  George P. Hollenbeck
2004  Frank J. Landy
2005  Frank W. Erwin and David A. Nadler
2006  Michael Beer
2007  W. Warner Burke
2008  Morgan McCall

Distinguished Scientific Contributions Award

1983  William A. Owens 
1984  Patricia C. Smith       
1985  Marvin D. Dunnette 
1986  Ernest J. McCormick
1987  Robert M. Guion 
1988  Raymond A. Katzell 
1989  Lyman W. Porter       
1990  Edward E. Lawler III 
1991  John P. Campbell       
1992  J. Richard Hackman 
1993  Edwin A. Locke    
1994  Bernard M. Bass        
1995  Frank Schmidt & John Hunter  
1996  Fred Fiedler  
1997  Charles L. Hulin  
1998  Terence Mitchell & Victor H. Vroom
1999  Neal Schmitt 
2000  Benjamin Schneider
2001  Daniel R. Ilgen
2002  Gary P. Latham & Robert D. Pritchard
2003  Walter C. Borman & Paul R. Sackett
2004  Kevin Murphy
2005  Robert G. Folger & Angelo DeNisi
2006  Jerald Greenberg
2007  Ruth Kanfer
2008  Fritz Drasgow
 

Distinguished Service Contributions Award

1989  Richard J. Campbell & Mildred E. Katzell      
1990  Paul W. Thayer  
1991  Mary L. Tenopyr 
1992  Irwin L. Goldstein 
1993  Robert M. Guion  
1994  Ann Howard  
1995  Milton D. Hakel       
1996  Sheldon Zedeck   
1997  Ronald Johnson  
1998  Neal Schmitt  
1999  Richard Klimoski & William Macey 
2000  Paul Sackett 
2001  James Farr
2002  Award not presented
2003  Award not presented
2004  Wayne Camara & Nancy Tippins
2005  P. Richard Jeanneret
2006  Janet Barnes-Farrell
2007  Laura K. Koppes
2008  Award not presented

Distinguished Early Career Contributions Award*

1992  John R. Hollenbeck  
1993  Raymond A. Noe  
1994  Cheri Ostroff         
1995  Timothy A. Judge  
1996  Joseph Martocchio
1997  Stephen Gilliland  
1998  Deniz S. Ones & Chockalingam  
         Viswesvaran  
1999  Richard DeShon 
2000  Award not presented
2001  Daniel M. Cable & José Cortina
2002  Michele J. Gelfand
2003  David Chan
2004  Jeffrey LePine
2005  Jason A. Colquitt
2006  Filip Lievens
2007  Gilad Chen & Joyce Bono
2008  Remus Illies

*Prior to 2001, this award was named the Ernest J. McCormick Award for Distinguished Early Career Contributions.

Distinguished Teaching Contributions Award

2004 Paul Muchinsky  
2005 Marcus W. Dickson 
2006 Roseanne J. Foti
2007 Charles L. Hulin
2008 Michelle (Mikki) Hebl
 

M. Scott Myers Award for Applied Research in the Workplace

1998  Frank L. Landy, James L. Farr, Edwin Fleishman, & Robert J. Vance
1999  Chris Hornick, Kathryn Fox, Ted Axton, Beverly Wyatt, & Therese Revitte
2000  HumRRO, PDRI, RGI, Caliber, & FAA
2001  Eduardo Salas, Janice A. Cannon-Bowers, Joan H. Johnston, Kimberly A. Smith-Jentsch, Carol Paris
2002  Norman G. Peterson, Michael D. Mumford, Walter C. Borman, P. Richard Jeanneret, & Edwin A. Fleishman
2003 Award withheld
2004 Elaine D. Pulakos, Sharon Arad, Wally C. Borman, David W. Dorsey, Rose Mueller-Hanson, Neal W. Schmitt, Susan S. White
2005 Robert J. House, Paul J. Hanges, Mansour Javidan, Peter W. Dorman, Vipin Gupta, 
Mary Sully de Luque
2006 Elizabeth B. Kolmstetter, Ann M. Quigley, Deborah Gebhardt, James C. Sharf, Todd Baker, and Joanna G. Lange
2007 David Baker, Eduardo Salas, Alexander Alonso, Rachel Day, Amy Holtzman, Laura Steighner, Catherine Porter, Heidi King, James Battles, & Paul Barach
2008 George Alliger, Winston Bennett, Charles Colegrove, Rebecca Beard, & Michael Garrity

William A. Owens Scholarly Achievement Award

1998 

1998  Avraham N. Kluger & Angelo S. DeNisi

1999  David Chan & Neal Schmitt
1999  Peter Dorfman, Jon Howell, Shozo Hibino, Jin Lee, Uday Tate, & Arnoldo Bautista
2000  Paul Tesluk & Rick Jacobs
2001  Timothy A. Judge, Chad A. Higgins, Carl J. Thoresen, & Murray R. Barrick
2002  E. Allan Lind, Jerald Greenberg, Kimberly S. Scott, & Thomas D. Welchans
2002 Elaine D. Pulakos, Sharon Arad, Michelle A. Donovan, & Kevin E. Plamondon
2003 Katherine J. Klein, Amy B. Conn, & Joann Speer Sorra
2004 Benjamin Schneider, Amy Nicole Salvaggio, & Montse Subirats
2005 Philip M. Podsakoff, Scott B. MacKenzie, Jay Lee, & Nathan P. Podsakoff
2006 Ruth Kanfer and Phillip L. Ackerman
2007 Joshua Sacco & Neil Schmitt
2008 David Harrison, Daniel Newman, & Philip Roth


 

Edwin E. Ghiselli Award for Research Design

1984  Max Bazerman & Henry Farber 1993  Elizabeth Weldon & Karen Jehn 
1985  Gary Johns 1994  Linda Simon & Thomas Lokar 
1986  Craig Russell & Mary Van Sell 1995  Award withheld 
1987  Sandra L. Kirmeyer 1996  Award withheld
1988  Award withheld 1997  Kathy Hanisch, Charles Hulin, & Steven Seitz 
1989  Kathy Hanisch & Charles Hulin 1998  David Chan
1990  Award withheld 1999  Award withheld
1991  Award withheld 2000  Award withheld
1992  Julie Olson & Peter Carnevale 2001*
 
 

*Award suspended due to lack of nominations.

 
S. Rains Wallace Dissertation Research Award

1970  Robert Pritchard   
1971  Michael Wood  
1972  William H. Mobley 
1973  Phillip W. Yetton  
1974  Thomas Cochran  
1975  John Langdale   
1976  Denis Umstot  
1977  William A. Schiemann 
1978  Joanne Martin & Marilyn Morgan   
1979  Stephen A. Stumpf       
1980  Marino S. Basadur  
1981  Award not presented 
1982  Kenneth Pearlman  
1983  Michael Campion  
1984  Jill Graham   
1985  Loriann Roberson  
1986  Award not presented       
1987  Collette Frayne  
1988  Sandra J. Wayne  
1989  Leigh L. Thompson 
1990  Award not presented
1991  Rodney A. McCloy
1992  Elizabeth W. Morrison
1993  Deborah F. Crown
1994  Deniz S. Ones
1995  Chockalingam Viswesvaran 
1996  Daniel Cable & Steffanie Wilk
1997  Tammy Allen
1998  David W. Dorsey & Paul E. Tesluk
1999  Taly Dvir 
2000  Steven E. Scullen 
2001  Robert E. Ployhart
2002  Award not presented
2003  Mark G. Ehrhart
2004  John Hausknecht & Joshua Sacco
2005  Lisa H. Nishii
2006  Remus Ilies
2007  J. Craig Wallace
2008  Subrahmaniam Tangirala

 
John C. Flanagan Award for Best Student Contribution at SIOP

1993  Susan I. Bachman, Amy B. Gross, Steffanie L. Wilk
1994  Lisa Finkelstein
1995  Joann Speer-Sorra
1996  Frederick L. Oswald & Jeff W. Johnson
1997  Syed Saad & Paul Sackett
1998  Frederick P. Morgeson & Michael A. Campion
1999  Chris Kubisiak, Mary Ann Hanson, & Daren Buck
2000  Kristen Horgen, Mary Ann Hanson, Walter Borman, & Chris Kubisiak
2001  Lisa M. Donahue, Donald Truxillo, & Lisa M. Finkelstein
2002  Remus Ilies
2003  Amy Colbert
2004  Ute-Christine Klehe & Christopher M. Berry
2005  Stacey Turner, Sarah Singletary, Jenessa Shapiro, Eden King, and Mikki Hebl
2006  Meagan M. Tunstall, Lisa M. Penney, Emily M. Hunter, and Evan L Weinberger
2007  Katherine Ely, Jordan M. Robbins, & Megan Noel Shaw
2008  Elizabeth Conjar & Dan Horn


Robert J. Wherry Award for the Best Paper at the IO/OB Conference

1981 Mary Anne Lahey
1982 Missing   
1983  Maureen Ambrose       
1984 Missing    
1985 Alene Becker       
1986-87 Missing   
1988  Christopher Reilly 
1989  Andrea Eddy 
1990  Amy Shwartz, Wayne Hall, & J. Martineau
1991  Paul Van Katwyk 
1992  Sarah Moore-Hirschl
1993  Daniel Skarlicki         
1994  Talya Bauer & Lynda Aiman-Smith      
1995  Mary Ann Hannigan & Robert Sinclair  
1996  Adam Stetzer & David Hofmann
1997  Scott Behson & Edward P. Zuber III
1998  Dana Milanovich & Elizabeth Muniz
1999  Michael Grojean & Paul Hanges
2000  Jennifer Palmer
2001  Steven M. Rumery
2002 Damon Bryant & Dahlia Forde
2003 Renee DeRouin
2004 John Skinner & Scott Morris
2005 Michael Woodward, Kenneth Randall, Bennett Price, & Andrea Saravia
2006 Aleksandra Luksyte
2007 Elizabeth Conjar
 

Best Poster on Lesbian/Gay/Bisexual/Transgender (LGBT)
Issues at the SIOP Conference

2007  Nancy Day & Patricia Green 2008  Frank Golom & Benjamin Liberman

SIOP Gold Medal Award

  2002          Lee Hakel

Sidney A. Fine Grant Award

2002  Todd J. Maurer
2007  Kevin Fox & Patrick Maloney

 

The Douglas W. Bray and Ann Howard Award

2005 Deborah Rupp, Alyssa Mitchell Gibbons, Sang E. Woo, Myungjoon Kim, & Lori Anderson Snyder
2007 Filip Lievens
   

The Leslie W. Joyce and Paul W. Thayer Fellowship

2007 Laurie Wasko
2008 Ari Malka
   

 

Small Grant Recipients            

2002 

Jennifer Carr and S. David Kriska; Frederick L. Oswald, Patrick D. Converse, Michael A. Gillespie, Kevin A. Field, Elizabeth B. Bizot, Bill Tirre, and Peg Hendershot
2003 Jeffrey Stanton, Paul Mastrangelo, Kathryn Stam, and Slawomir Marcinkowski
2004 Steffanie Wilk & Nancy Rothbard; Michael Horvath; Sandy J. Wayne & Monica Gavino
2005 Ashley M. Guidroz, Jennider Z. Gillespie, & Elizabeth Reed; Sheng (Monica) Wang; Robert E. Ployhart, Jeff Weekley, & Filip Lievens
2006 Ann H. Huffman, Ashlee Jenson, & Sartoris S. Youngcourt; David M. LaHuis & John M. Avis; Sally A. Carless, Paul J. Taylor, Elizabeth Allworth, & Dave Bartram
2007 Tracy Rizzuto & Julio Silva; Eva DeRous & Ann Marie Ryan; Aaron Schmidt, Michael Gillespie, & Linsey Korba; Jinyan Fan & Felix Lopez
2008 Lisa Finkelstein, Kurt Kraiger, & Jerry Wittmer; Nathan Bowling, Jeffery Labrador, & John McKee


Graduate Student Scholarships

2004 Lori Anderson Snyder, Lisa Roberts, & J. Craig Wallace
2005 Erin Richards, Abbie Shipp, & Lauren McNall
2006 Tracy Lambert & Anuradha Ramesh
2007 Juan Madera & Marissa Edwards
2008 Sonia Ghuman & Whitney Botsford

The Lee Hakel Graduate Student Scholarship

2006 Adam Grant
2007 Lisa Leslie
2008 Liu-Qin Yang


 

 

The Mary L. Tenopyr Graduate Student Scholarship

2007 Brett Bradley
   
   

SIOP Members Who Have Received APA Awards

Award for Distinguished Contributions to Education in Psychology

1973    James B. Maas 

Award for Distinguished Professional Contributions

1976  John C. Flanagan
1980  Douglas W. Bray
1989  Florence Kaslow 
1991  Joseph D. Matarazzo 
1992  Harry Levinson 

 
Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology

1957  Carl I. Hovland 1972  Edwin E. Ghiselli 

 
Distinguished Scientific Award for the Applications of Psychology

1980  Edwin A. Fleishman
1983  Donald E. Super
1987  Robert Glaser

1994  John E. Hunter & Frank Schmidt 
2005  John Campbell


Distinguished Scientific Award for an Early Career Contribution to Psychology

1989  Ruth Kanfer
1994  Cheri Ostroff

2005  Frederick Morgeson
2009  Robert Ployhart


Award for Distinguished Contributions to the International Advancement of Psychology

1994  Harry C. Triandis 1999  Edwin A. Fleishman  

SIOP Members Who Have Received APF Awards

Gold Medal Award for Life Achievement in the Application of Psychology

1986  Kenneth E. Clark
1988  Morris S. Viteles
1991  Douglas W. Bray 
1993  John C. Flanagan 
1994  Charles H. Lawshe 
2004  Edwin A. Fleishman

SIOP Members Who Have Received APS Awards

James McKeen Cattell Fellow Award

1993  Edwin A. Fleishman, Robert Glaser, & Donald E. Super
1998  Harry C. Triandis
1999  Fred E. Fiedler & Robert J. Sternberg
2000  Robert M. Guion
2007/08 Frank L. Schmidt