Call for Nominations and Entries: 2010 Awards for the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Anna Erickson, Chair
SIOP Awards Committee
Distinguished Professional Contributions Award
Distinguished Scientific Contributions Award
Distinguished Service Contributions Award
Distinguished Early Career Contributions Award
Distinguished Teaching Contributions Award
S. Rains Wallace Dissertation Award
William A. Owens Scholarly Achievement Award
M. Scott Myers Award for Applied Research in the Workplace
DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF NOMINATIONS: June 30, 2009
All nominations must be made online. A portal for submission of online nominations and entries for the 2010 SIOP awards will be available through the SIOP Web site starting in May.
Nomination Guidelines and Criteria
Distinguished Professional Contributions, Distinguished Scientific Contributions, Distinguished Service Contributions, Distinguished Early Career Contributions, and Distinguished Teaching Contributions Awards
1. Nominations may be submitted by any member of SIOP, the American Psychological Association, the Association for Psychological Science, or by any person who is sponsored by a member of one of these organizations. Self-nominations are welcome.
2. Only members of SIOP may be nominated for the award.
3. A current vita of the nominee should accompany the letter of nomination. In addition, the nominator should include materials that illustrate the contributions of the nominee. Supporting letters may be included as part of the nomination packet. The number of supporting letters (not counting the nominating letter) for any given nomination should be between a minimum of three and a maximum of five.
4. Nominees who are nonrecipients of the Distinguished Scientific Contributions Award, Distinguished Professional Contributions Award, and Distinguished Service Contributions Award will be reconsidered annually for 2 years after their initial nomination.
5. Letters of nomination, vita, and all supporting letters (including at least three and no more than five) or materials must be submitted online by June 30, 2009.
6. The Distinguished Professional Contributions, Distinguished Scientific Contributions, Distinguished Service Contributions, and Distinguished Teaching Contributions Awards are intended to recognize a lifetime of achievement in each of their respective areas.
Administrative Procedures
1. The SIOP Awards Committee will review the letters of nomination and all supporting materials of all nominees and make a recommendation concerning one or more nominees to the SIOP Executive Committee. Two or more nominees may be selected if their contributions are similarly distinguished.
2. The Executive Committee may either endorse or reject the recommendations of the Awards Committee but may not substitute a nominee of its own.
3. In the absence of a nominee who is deemed deserving of the award by both the Awards Committee and the Executive Committee, the award may be withheld.
Distinguished Professional Contributions Award
In recognition of outstanding contributions to the practice of industrial and organizational psychology.
The award is given to an individual who has developed, refined, and implemented practices, procedures, and methods that have had a major impact on both people in organizational settings and the profession of I-O psychology. The contributions of the individual should have advanced the profession by increasing the effectiveness of I-O psychologists working in business, industry, government, and other organizational settings.
The recipient of the award is given a plaque and a cash prize of $1,500. In addition, the recipient is invited to give an address, related to his or her contributions, at the subsequent meeting of SIOP.
Criteria for the Award
The letter of nomination should address the following points:
1. The general nature of the nominee’s contributions to the practice of I-O psychology.
2. The contributions that the nominee has made to either (a) the development of practices, procedures, and methods; or (b) the implementation of practices, procedures, and methods. If appropriate, contributions of both types should be noted.
3. If relevant, the extent to which there is scientifically sound evidence to support the effectiveness of the relevant practices, procedures, and methods of the nominee.
4. The impact of the nominee’s contributions on the practice of I-O psychology.
5. The stature of the nominee as a practitioner vis-à-vis other prominent practitioners in the field of I-O psychology.
6. The evidence or documentation that is available to support the contributions of the nominee. Nominators should provide more than mere testimonials about the impact of a nominee’s professional contributions.
7. The extent to which the nominee has disseminated information about his or her methods, procedures, and practices through publications, presentations, workshops, and so forth. The methods, procedures, and practices must be both available to and utilized by other practicing I-O psychologists.
8. The organizational setting(s) of the nominee’s work (industry, government, academia, etc.) will not be a factor in selecting a winner of the award.
9. This award is intended to recognize a lifetime of contributions to the profession of I-O psychology.
Distinguished Scientific Contributions Award
In recognition of outstanding contributions to the science of industrial and organizational psychology.
This award is given to the individual who has made the most distinguished empirical and/or theoretical scientific contributions to the field of I-O psychology. The setting in which the nominee made the contributions (i.e., industry, academia, government) is not relevant.
The recipient of the award is given a plaque and a cash prize of $1,500. In addition, the recipient is invited to give an address that relates to his or her contributions at the subsequent meeting of SIOP.
Criteria for the Award
The letter of nomination should address the following issues:
1. The general nature of the nominee’s scientific contributions.
2. The most important theoretical and/or empirical contributions.
3. The impact of the nominee’s contributions on the science of I-O psychology, including the impact that the work has had on the work of students and colleagues.
4. The stature of the nominee as a scientist vis-à-vis other prominent scientists in the field of I-O psychology.
5. This award is intended to recognize a lifetime of achievement.
Distinguished Service Contributions Award
In recognition of sustained, significant, and outstanding service to the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
This award is given for sustained, significant, and outstanding service to SIOP. Service contributions can be made in a variety of ways which include but are not limited to serving as (a) an elected officer of the Society, (b) the chair of a standing or ad hoc committee of the Society, (c) a member of a standing or ad hoc committee of the Society, and (d) a formal representative of the Society to other organizations. The recipient is given a plaque and cash prize of $1,500.
Criteria for the Award
The letter of nomination should address the nature and quality of the nominee’s service contributions. A detailed history of the individual’s service-oriented contributions should be provided. It should specify:
1. The offices held by the nominee.
2. The duration of his or her service in each such office.
3. The significant achievements of the nominee while an incumbent in each office.
4. This award is intended to recognize a lifetime of service.
Distinguished Early Career Contributions Award
In recognition of distinguished early career contributions to the science or practice of industrial and organizational psychology.
This award is given to an individual who has made distinguished contributions to the science and/or practice of I-O psychology within seven (7) years of receiving the PhD degree. In order to be considered for the 2010 award, nominees must have defended their dissertation no earlier than 2003. The setting in which the nominee has made the contributions (i.e., academia, government, industry) is not relevant.
The recipient of the award is given a plaque and a cash prize of $1,500. In addition, the recipient is invited to give an address that relates to his or her contribution at the subsequent meeting of SIOP.
Criteria for the Award
The letter of nomination should address the following issues:
1. The general nature of the nominee’s contributions to science and/or practice.
2. The most important contributions to science and/or practice.
3. The impact of the nominee’s contribution on the science and/or practice of I-O psychology, including the impact that the work has had on the work of students and colleagues.
4. The status of the nominee as a scientist and/or practitioner vis-à-vis other prominent scientists and/or practitioners in the field of I-O psychology.
5. Although the number of publications is an important consideration, it is not the only one. An equally important criteria is the quality of the publications and their impact on the field of I-O psychology.
6. Documentation should be provided that indicates that the nominee received his or her PhD degree no earlier than 2003.
Distinguished Teaching Contributions Award
In recognition of SIOP members who demonstrate a sustained record of excellence in teaching, as revealed by excellence in the classroom or via Web-based teaching, student development, and community service via teaching.
The annual award will be given to an individual who has sustained experience in a full-time university/college tenure-track or tenured position(s) requiring substantial teaching responsibilities. There is no restriction on the specific courses taught, only that the courses concern perspectives or applications of industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology. Nominations of individuals whose primary responsibilities lie in teaching undergraduates and terminal master’s students are encouraged.
The recipient of the award is given a plaque and a cash prize of $1,500. In addition, the recipient is invited to give an address that relates to his or her contribution at the subsequent meeting of SIOP.
Criteria for Evaluation of Teaching
Although evidence of teaching excellence is likely to come from the total of all courses that one teaches, evidence of excellence in teaching I-O psychology courses or related areas is expected. The criteria are flexible and may involve the following:
1. Demonstration of excellence in teaching. Evidence for this might include course syllabi, lesson outlines, a statement of teaching philosophy, some form of student evaluation criteria (e.g., ratings) or receiving an award for teaching, examples of innovative methods in the design and delivery of course content, a summary of courses taught within the last 3 years (include title and short description of course, along with number of students enrolled), descriptions of textbooks written, course handouts, letters from supervisor(s) or colleagues, and up to three letters of support from students.
2. Demonstration of student accomplishments. Evidence for this would include papers or projects completed by students, students presenting papers at professional meetings or students subsequently publishing their work done with the teacher, stimulation of student research, awards or grants received by students, students pursuing further graduate work, successful placement of students in jobs or graduate programs, careers or internships achieved by students, and other student-oriented activities (e.g., undergraduate student accomplishments will be highly valued).
3. Demonstration of excellence in teaching-related professional activities. Evidence for this might include publications of articles on teaching, memberships in teaching organizations, teaching awards and other forms of prior recognition, community presentations about topics related to industrial and organizational psychology, and attendance at professional meetings or workshops relevant to teaching.
The nomination should include (a) a current curriculum vitae, (b) a short biography, and (c) a maximum of 10 additional supporting documents, addressing the criteria above.
Administration Procedures
1. A subcommittee (eight members) of the SIOP Awards Committee will review the nominations. At least four members shall work at colleges or universities focused primarily on undergraduate or master’s level education.
2. The subcommittee will make a recommendation about the winning nomination to the SIOP Awards Committee, which will transmit the recommendation to the SIOP Executive Committee. If appropriate, nominators of any meritorious nonwinning candidate will be contacted to encourage renominating his/her candidate for the next year’s deliberations.
M. Scott Myers Award for Applied Research in the Workplace
In recognition of a project or product representing an outstanding example of the practice of industrial and organizational psychology in the workplace.
This annual award, honoring M. Scott Myers, will be given to an individual practitioner or team of practitioners who have developed and conducted/applied a specific project or product representing an example of outstanding practice of I-O psychology in the workplace (i.e., business, industry, government). Projects must have been conducted in the workplace within the last 40 years and cover a time period of no more than 8 years. Products (e.g., tests, questionnaires, videos, software, but not books or articles) must be used in the workplace and developed within the last 40 years. Projects or products may be in any area of I-O psychology (e.g., compensation, employee relations, equal employment opportunity, human factors, job analysis, job design, organizational development, organizational behavior, leadership, position classification, safety, selection, training).
The award recipient(s) will receive a plaque commemorating the achievement, a cash prize of $1,500 and an invitation to make a presentation at the annual conference of SIOP. Team awards will be shared among the members of the team.
Criteria for Evaluation of Projects or Products
Nominations will be evaluated on the extent to which they:
1. Have a sound technical/scientific basis.
2. Advance objectives of clients/users.
3. Promote full use of human potential.
4. Comply with applicable psychological, legal, and ethical standards.
5. Improve the acceptance of I-O psychology in the workplace.
6. Show innovation and excellence.
Guidelines for Submission of Projects or Products
1. Nominations may be submitted by any member of SIOP. Self-nominations are welcome.
2. Individuals or teams may be nominated. Each individual nominee must be a current member of the Society. If a team is nominated, at least one of the team members must be a current member of the Society, and each team member must have made a significant contribution to the project or product.
3. Each nomination must contain the following information:
a. A letter of nomination which explains how the project or product meets the six evaluation criteria above.
b. A technical report which describes the project or product in detail. This may be an existing report.
c. A description of any formal complaints of a legal or ethical nature which have been made regarding the project or product.
d. A list of three client references who may be contacted by the Myers Award Subcommittee regarding the project or product.
e. (Optional) Up to 6 additional documents that may be helpful for evaluating the nomination (e.g., a sample of the product, technical manuals, independent evaluations).
4. If appropriate, nominators of highly rated nonwinning candidates will be contacted to encourage renomination of a candidate for up to 3 years.
5. The Awards Committee will maintain the confidentiality of secure materials.
6. Nominations must be submitted online by June 30, 2009.
Administrative Procedures
1. Nomination materials will be reviewed by a subcommittee of the SIOP Awards Committee, consisting of at least three members, all of whom work primarily as I-O practitioners.
2. The Awards Committee will make a recommendation to the SIOP Executive Committee about the award-winning project or product.
3. The Executive Committee may either accept or reject the recommendation of the Awards Committee but may not substitute a nominee of its own.
4. In the absence of a nominee that is deemed deserving of the award by both the Awards Committee and the Executive Committee, the award may be withheld.
William A. Owens Scholarly Achievement Award
In recognition of the best publication (appearing in a refereed journal) in the field of industrial and organizational psychology during the past full year (2008).
This annual award, honoring William A. Owens, is given to the author(s) of the publication in a refereed journal judged to have the highest potential to significantly impact the field of I-O psychology. There is no restriction on the specific journals in which the publication appears, only that the journal be refereed and that the publication concerns a topic of relevance to the field of I-O psychology. Only publications with a 2008 publication date will be considered.
The author(s) of the best publication is (are) awarded a plaque and a $1,500 cash prize (to be split in the case of multiple authors).
Criteria for Evaluation of Publications
Publications will be evaluated in terms of the following criteria:
1. The degree to which the research addresses a phenomenon that is of significance to the field of I-O psychology.
2. The potential impact or significance of the publication to the field of
I-O psychology.
3. The degree to which the research displays technical adequacy, including issues of internal validity, external validity, appropriate methodology, appropriate statistical analysis, comprehensiveness of review (if the publication is a literature review), and so forth.
Guidelines for Submission of Publications
1. Publications may be submitted by any member of SIOP, the American Psychological Society, the Association for Psychological Science, or by any person who is sponsored by a member of one of these organizations. Self- and other nominations are welcome. The Owens Award Subcommittee may also generate nominations. Those evaluating the publications will be blind to the source of the nomination.
2. Publications having multiple authors are acceptable.
3. Publications must be submitted online by June 30, 2009.
Administrative Procedures
1. Publications will be reviewed by a subcommittee of the Awards Committee of SIOP, consisting of at least six members.
2. The Awards Committee will make a recommendation to the Executive Committee of SIOP about the award-winning publication and, if appropriate, a publication deserving honorable mention status.
3. The Executive Committee may either endorse or reject the recommendations of the Awards Committee, but may not substitute a nominee of its own.
4. In the absence of a publication that is deemed deserving of the award by both the Awards Committee and the Executive Committee, the award may be withheld.
S. Rains Wallace Dissertation Research Award
In recognition of the best doctoral dissertation research in the field of industrial and organizational psychology.
This award is given to the person who completes the best doctoral dissertation research germane to the field of I-O psychology. The winning dissertation research should demonstrate the use of research methods that are both rigorous and creative. The winner of the award will receive a plaque, a cash prize of $1,000, and the opportunity to present their dissertation research in a poster session at the next meeting of SIOP.
Criteria for Evaluation and Submissions
Dissertation summaries will be evaluated in terms of the following criteria:
1. The degree to which the research addresses a phenomenon that is of significance to the field of I-O psychology.
2. The extent to which the research shows appropriate consideration of relevant theoretical and empirical literature. This should be reflected in both the formulation of hypotheses tested and the selection of methods used in their testing.
3. The degree to which the research has produced findings that have high levels of validity (i.e., internal, external, construct, and statistical conclusion). The setting of the proposed research is of lesser importance than its ability to yield highly valid conclusions about a real-world phenomenon of relevance to the field of I-O psychology. Thus, the methods of the research (including subjects, procedures, measures, manipulations, and data analytic strategies) should be specified in sufficient detail to allow for an assessment of the capacity of the proposed research to yield valid inferences.
4. The extent to which the author (a) offers reasonable interpretations of the results of his or her research, (b) draws appropriate inferences about the theoretical and applied implications of the same results, and (c) suggests promising directions for future research.
5. The degree to which the research yields information that is both practically and theoretically relevant and important.
6. The extent to which ideas in the proposal are logically, succinctly, and clearly presented.
Guidelines for Submission of Proposal
1. Entries may be submitted only by individuals who are endorsed (sponsored) by a member of SIOP, the Association for Psychological Science, or the American Psychological Association.
2. Each entrant should submit a copy of their paper (not to exceed 30 pages of double-spaced text) based on his or her dissertation. The name of the entrant, institutional affiliation, current mailing address, and phone number should appear only on the title page of the paper.
3. Papers are limited to a maximum of 30 double-spaced pages. This limit includes the title page, abstract, text, tables, figures, and appendices. However, it excludes references.
4. Papers should be prepared in accord with the guidelines provided in the fifth edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. Note, however, that the abstract may contain up to 300 words.
5. The paper must be based on a dissertation that was accepted by the graduate college 2 years or less before June 20, 2009, with the stipulation that an entrant may only submit once.
6. The entrant must provide a letter from his or her dissertation chair that specifies the date of acceptance of the dissertation by the graduate school of the institution and that the submission adequately represents all aspects of the completed dissertation. In addition, the entrant must provide a letter of endorsement from a member of SIOP, the Association for Psychological Science, or the American Psychological Association who is familiar with the entrant’s dissertation. Both of these letters may be from the same individual.
7. Entries (accompanied by supporting letters) must be submitted online by June 30, 2009.
Administrative Procedures
1. All entries will be reviewed by the Awards Committee of SIOP.
2. The Awards Committee will make a recommendation to the Executive Committee of SIOP about the award-winning dissertation and, if appropriate, up to two dissertations deserving honorable mention status.
3. The Executive Committee may either endorse or reject the recommendations of the Awards Committee but may not substitute recommendations of its own.
4. In the absence of a dissertation that is deemed deserving of the award by both the Awards Committee and the Executive Committee, the award may be withheld.
Past SIOP Award Recipients
Listed below are past SIOP award recipients as well as SIOP members who have received APA, APF, or APS awards.
Distinguished Professional Contributions Award
1977 Douglas W. Bray
1978 Melvin Sorcher
1979 Award withheld
1980 Award withheld
1981 Carl F. Frost
1982 John Flanagan
1983 Edwin Fleishman
1984 Mary L. Tenopyr
1985 Delmar L. Landen
1986 Paul W.Thayer
1987 Paul Sparks
1988 Herbert H. Meyer
1989 William C. Byham
1990 P. Richard Jeanneret
1991 Charles H. Lawshe
1992 Gerald V. Barrett |
1993 Award withheld
1994 Patricia J. Dyer
1995 Allen I. Kraut
1996 Erich Prien
1997 John Hinrichs
1998 Gary P. Latham
1999 Lowell Hellervik
2000 Joseph L. Moses
2001 David P. Campbell
2002 George C. Thornton III
2003 George P. Hollenbeck
2004 Frank J. Landy
2005 Frank W. Erwin and David A. Nadler
2006 Michael Beer
2007 W. Warner Burke
2008 Morgan McCall
|
Distinguished Scientific Contributions Award
1983 William A. Owens
1984 Patricia C. Smith
1985 Marvin D. Dunnette
1986 Ernest J. McCormick
1987 Robert M. Guion
1988 Raymond A. Katzell
1989 Lyman W. Porter
1990 Edward E. Lawler III
1991 John P. Campbell
1992 J. Richard Hackman
1993 Edwin A. Locke
1994 Bernard M. Bass
1995 Frank Schmidt & John Hunter
1996 Fred Fiedler
1997 Charles L. Hulin |
1998 Terence Mitchell & Victor H. Vroom
1999 Neal Schmitt
2000 Benjamin Schneider
2001 Daniel R. Ilgen
2002 Gary P. Latham & Robert D. Pritchard
2003 Walter C. Borman & Paul R. Sackett
2004 Kevin Murphy
2005 Robert G. Folger & Angelo DeNisi
2006 Jerald Greenberg
2007 Ruth Kanfer
2008 Fritz Drasgow
|
Distinguished Service Contributions Award
1989 Richard J. Campbell & Mildred E. Katzell
1990 Paul W. Thayer
1991 Mary L. Tenopyr
1992 Irwin L. Goldstein
1993 Robert M. Guion
1994 Ann Howard
1995 Milton D. Hakel
1996 Sheldon Zedeck
1997 Ronald Johnson
1998 Neal Schmitt
1999 Richard Klimoski & William Macey |
2000 Paul Sackett
2001 James Farr
2002 Award not presented
2003 Award not presented
2004 Wayne Camara & Nancy Tippins
2005 P. Richard Jeanneret
2006 Janet Barnes-Farrell
2007 Laura K. Koppes
2008 Award not presented |
Distinguished Early Career Contributions Award*
1992 John R. Hollenbeck
1993 Raymond A. Noe
1994 Cheri Ostroff
1995 Timothy A. Judge
1996 Joseph Martocchio
1997 Stephen Gilliland
1998 Deniz S. Ones & Chockalingam
Viswesvaran
1999 Richard DeShon |
2000 Award not presented
2001 Daniel M. Cable & José Cortina
2002 Michele J. Gelfand
2003 David Chan
2004 Jeffrey LePine
2005 Jason A. Colquitt
2006 Filip Lievens
2007 Gilad Chen & Joyce Bono
2008 Remus Illies |
*Prior to 2001, this award was named the Ernest J. McCormick Award for Distinguished Early Career Contributions.
Distinguished Teaching Contributions Award
2004 Paul Muchinsky
2005 Marcus W. Dickson
2006 Roseanne J. Foti |
2007 Charles L. Hulin
2008 Michelle (Mikki) Hebl
|
M. Scott Myers Award for Applied Research in the Workplace
| 1998 |
Frank L. Landy, James L. Farr, Edwin Fleishman, & Robert J. Vance |
| 1999 |
Chris Hornick, Kathryn Fox, Ted Axton, Beverly Wyatt, & Therese Revitte |
| 2000 |
HumRRO, PDRI, RGI, Caliber, & FAA |
| 2001 |
Eduardo Salas, Janice A. Cannon-Bowers, Joan H. Johnston, Kimberly A. Smith-Jentsch, Carol Paris |
| 2002 |
Norman G. Peterson, Michael D. Mumford, Walter C. Borman, P. Richard Jeanneret, & Edwin A. Fleishman |
| 2003 |
Award withheld |
| 2004 |
Elaine D. Pulakos, Sharon Arad, Wally C. Borman, David W. Dorsey, Rose Mueller-Hanson, Neal W. Schmitt, Susan S. White |
| 2005 |
Robert J. House, Paul J. Hanges, Mansour Javidan, Peter W. Dorman, Vipin Gupta,
Mary Sully de Luque |
| 2006 |
Elizabeth B. Kolmstetter, Ann M. Quigley, Deborah Gebhardt, James C. Sharf, Todd Baker, and Joanna G. Lange |
| 2007 |
David Baker, Eduardo Salas, Alexander Alonso, Rachel Day, Amy Holtzman, Laura Steighner, Catherine Porter, Heidi King, James Battles, & Paul Barach |
| 2008 |
George Alliger, Winston Bennett, Charles Colegrove, Rebecca Beard, & Michael Garrity |
William A. Owens Scholarly Achievement Award
| 1998 |
1998 Avraham N. Kluger & Angelo S. DeNisi
|
| 1999 |
David Chan & Neal Schmitt |
| 1999 |
Peter Dorfman, Jon Howell, Shozo Hibino, Jin Lee, Uday Tate, & Arnoldo Bautista |
| 2000 |
Paul Tesluk & Rick Jacobs |
| 2001 |
Timothy A. Judge, Chad A. Higgins, Carl J. Thoresen, & Murray R. Barrick |
| 2002 |
E. Allan Lind, Jerald Greenberg, Kimberly S. Scott, & Thomas D. Welchans |
| 2002 |
Elaine D. Pulakos, Sharon Arad, Michelle A. Donovan, & Kevin E. Plamondon |
| 2003 |
Katherine J. Klein, Amy B. Conn, & Joann Speer Sorra |
| 2004 |
Benjamin Schneider, Amy Nicole Salvaggio, & Montse Subirats |
| 2005 |
Philip M. Podsakoff, Scott B. MacKenzie, Jay Lee, & Nathan P. Podsakoff |
| 2006 |
Ruth Kanfer and Phillip L. Ackerman |
| 2007 |
Joshua Sacco & Neil Schmitt |
| 2008 |
David Harrison, Daniel Newman, & Philip Roth |
Edwin E. Ghiselli Award for Research Design
| 1984 |
Max Bazerman & Henry Farber |
1993 |
Elizabeth Weldon & Karen Jehn |
| 1985 |
Gary Johns |
1994 |
Linda Simon & Thomas Lokar |
| 1986 |
Craig Russell & Mary Van Sell |
1995 |
Award withheld |
| 1987 |
Sandra L. Kirmeyer |
1996 |
Award withheld |
| 1988 |
Award withheld |
1997 |
Kathy Hanisch, Charles Hulin, & Steven Seitz |
| 1989 |
Kathy Hanisch & Charles Hulin |
1998 |
David Chan |
| 1990 |
Award withheld |
1999 |
Award withheld |
| 1991 |
Award withheld |
2000 |
Award withheld |
| 1992 |
Julie Olson & Peter Carnevale |
2001*
|
|
*Award suspended due to lack of nominations.
S. Rains Wallace Dissertation Research Award
1970 Robert Pritchard
1971 Michael Wood
1972 William H. Mobley
1973 Phillip W. Yetton
1974 Thomas Cochran
1975 John Langdale
1976 Denis Umstot
1977 William A. Schiemann
1978 Joanne Martin & Marilyn Morgan
1979 Stephen A. Stumpf
1980 Marino S. Basadur
1981 Award not presented
1982 Kenneth Pearlman
1983 Michael Campion
1984 Jill Graham
1985 Loriann Roberson
1986 Award not presented
1987 Collette Frayne
1988 Sandra J. Wayne
1989 Leigh L. Thompson |
1990 Award not presented
1991 Rodney A. McCloy
1992 Elizabeth W. Morrison
1993 Deborah F. Crown
1994 Deniz S. Ones
1995 Chockalingam Viswesvaran
1996 Daniel Cable & Steffanie Wilk
1997 Tammy Allen
1998 David W. Dorsey & Paul E. Tesluk
1999 Taly Dvir
2000 Steven E. Scullen
2001 Robert E. Ployhart
2002 Award not presented
2003 Mark G. Ehrhart
2004 John Hausknecht & Joshua Sacco
2005 Lisa H. Nishii
2006 Remus Ilies
2007 J. Craig Wallace
2008 Subrahmaniam Tangirala |
John C. Flanagan Award for Best Student Contribution at SIOP
|
1993 Susan I. Bachman, Amy B. Gross, Steffanie L. Wilk
1994 Lisa Finkelstein
1995 Joann Speer-Sorra
1996 Frederick L. Oswald & Jeff W. Johnson
1997 Syed Saad & Paul Sackett
1998 Frederick P. Morgeson & Michael A. Campion
1999 Chris Kubisiak, Mary Ann Hanson, & Daren Buck
2000 Kristen Horgen, Mary Ann Hanson, Walter Borman, & Chris Kubisiak
2001 Lisa M. Donahue, Donald Truxillo, & Lisa M. Finkelstein
2002 Remus Ilies
2003 Amy Colbert
2004 Ute-Christine Klehe & Christopher M. Berry
2005 Stacey Turner, Sarah Singletary, Jenessa Shapiro, Eden King, and Mikki Hebl
2006 Meagan M. Tunstall, Lisa M. Penney, Emily M. Hunter, and Evan L Weinberger
2007 Katherine Ely, Jordan M. Robbins, & Megan Noel Shaw
2008 Elizabeth Conjar & Dan Horn
|
Robert J. Wherry Award for the Best Paper at the IO/OB Conference
|
1981 Mary Anne Lahey
1982 Missing
1983 Maureen Ambrose
1984 Missing
1985 Alene Becker
1986-87 Missing
1988 Christopher Reilly
1989 Andrea Eddy
1990 Amy Shwartz, Wayne Hall, & J. Martineau
1991 Paul Van Katwyk
1992 Sarah Moore-Hirschl
1993 Daniel Skarlicki
1994 Talya Bauer & Lynda Aiman-Smith
1995 Mary Ann Hannigan & Robert Sinclair
1996 Adam Stetzer & David Hofmann
1997 Scott Behson & Edward P. Zuber III
1998 Dana Milanovich & Elizabeth Muniz
1999 Michael Grojean & Paul Hanges
2000 Jennifer Palmer
2001 Steven M. Rumery
2002 Damon Bryant & Dahlia Forde
2003 Renee DeRouin
2004 John Skinner & Scott Morris
2005 Michael Woodward, Kenneth Randall, Bennett Price, & Andrea Saravia
2006 Aleksandra Luksyte
2007 Elizabeth Conjar
|
Best Poster on Lesbian/Gay/Bisexual/Transgender (LGBT)
Issues at the SIOP Conference
| 2007 Nancy Day & Patricia Green |
2008 Frank Golom & Benjamin Liberman |
SIOP Gold Medal Award
2002 Lee Hakel
Sidney A. Fine Grant Award
|
2002 Todd J. Maurer
2007 Kevin Fox & Patrick Maloney
|
The Douglas W. Bray and Ann Howard Award
| 2005 |
Deborah Rupp, Alyssa Mitchell Gibbons, Sang E. Woo, Myungjoon Kim, & Lori Anderson Snyder |
| 2007 |
Filip Lievens |
| |
|
The Leslie W. Joyce and Paul W. Thayer Fellowship
| 2007 |
Laurie Wasko |
| 2008 |
Ari Malka |
| |
|
|
|
Small Grant Recipients
|
|
2002
|
Jennifer Carr and S. David Kriska; Frederick L. Oswald, Patrick D. Converse, Michael A. Gillespie, Kevin A. Field, Elizabeth B. Bizot, Bill Tirre, and Peg Hendershot |
| 2003 |
Jeffrey Stanton, Paul Mastrangelo, Kathryn Stam, and Slawomir Marcinkowski |
| 2004 |
Steffanie Wilk & Nancy Rothbard; Michael Horvath; Sandy J. Wayne & Monica Gavino |
| 2005 |
Ashley M. Guidroz, Jennider Z. Gillespie, & Elizabeth Reed; Sheng (Monica) Wang; Robert E. Ployhart, Jeff Weekley, & Filip Lievens |
| 2006 |
Ann H. Huffman, Ashlee Jenson, & Sartoris S. Youngcourt; David M. LaHuis & John M. Avis; Sally A. Carless, Paul J. Taylor, Elizabeth Allworth, & Dave Bartram |
| 2007 |
Tracy Rizzuto & Julio Silva; Eva DeRous & Ann Marie Ryan; Aaron Schmidt, Michael Gillespie, & Linsey Korba; Jinyan Fan & Felix Lopez |
| 2008 |
Lisa Finkelstein, Kurt Kraiger, & Jerry Wittmer; Nathan Bowling, Jeffery Labrador, & John McKee |
Graduate Student Scholarships
| 2004 |
Lori Anderson Snyder, Lisa Roberts, & J. Craig Wallace |
| 2005 |
Erin Richards, Abbie Shipp, & Lauren McNall |
| 2006 |
Tracy Lambert & Anuradha Ramesh |
| 2007 |
Juan Madera & Marissa Edwards |
| 2008 |
Sonia Ghuman & Whitney Botsford |
The Lee Hakel Graduate Student Scholarship
| 2006 |
Adam Grant |
| 2007 |
Lisa Leslie |
| 2008 |
Liu-Qin Yang |
The Mary L. Tenopyr Graduate Student Scholarship
SIOP Members Who Have Received APA Awards
Award for Distinguished Contributions to Education in Psychology
1973 James B. Maas
Award for Distinguished Professional Contributions
1976 John C. Flanagan
1980 Douglas W. Bray
1989 Florence Kaslow |
1991 Joseph D. Matarazzo
1992 Harry Levinson |
Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology
| 1957 |
Carl I. Hovland |
1972 |
Edwin E. Ghiselli |
Distinguished Scientific Award for the Applications of Psychology
|
1980 Edwin A. Fleishman
1983 Donald E. Super
1987 Robert Glaser
|
1994 John E. Hunter & Frank Schmidt
2005 John Campbell |
Distinguished Scientific Award for an Early Career Contribution to Psychology
|
1989 Ruth Kanfer
1994 Cheri Ostroff
|
2005 Frederick Morgeson
2009 Robert Ployhart
|
Award for Distinguished Contributions to the International Advancement of Psychology
| 1994 Harry C. Triandis |
1999 Edwin A. Fleishman |
SIOP Members Who Have Received APF Awards
Gold Medal Award for Life Achievement in the Application of Psychology
1986 Kenneth E. Clark
1988 Morris S. Viteles
1991 Douglas W. Bray |
1993 John C. Flanagan
1994 Charles H. Lawshe
2004 Edwin A. Fleishman |
SIOP Members Who Have Received APS Awards
James McKeen Cattell Fellow Award
| 1993 |
Edwin A. Fleishman, Robert Glaser, & Donald E. Super |
| 1998 |
Harry C. Triandis |
| 1999 |
Fred E. Fiedler & Robert J. Sternberg |
| 2000 |
Robert M. Guion |
| 2007/08 |
Frank L. Schmidt |