Home Home | About Us | Sitemap | Contact  
  • Info For
  • Professionals
  • Students
  • Educators
  • Media
  • Search
    Powered By Google

Call for Nominations and Entries: 2005 Awards for the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Daniel B. Turban, Chair 
SIOP Awards Committee


Note the Deadline For Receipt of Nominations

July 1, 2004!



Distinguished Professional Contributions Award

Distinguished Scientific Contributions Award

Distinguished Service Contributions Award

Distinguished Early Career Contributions Award

Distinguished Teaching Contributions Award

S. Rains Wallace Dissertation Award

William A. Owens Scholarly Achievement Award

M. Scott Myers Award for Applied Research in the Workplace

DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF NOMINATIONS: JULY 1, 2004!

Send nominations and entries for all awards to:

Daniel Turban
College of Business
517 Cornell Hall
University of Missouri
Columbia, MO 65211-2600

New Informal Nomination Procedure

To insure that the Awards Committee has a sufficient number of high quality nominees, we are asking nominators (self-nominators are welcome) to send the name of their nominee to Daniel Turban (turban@missouri.edu) by June 1, 2004. Full nomination packets are then due by July 1, 2004. Please note, however, that nomination packets will be accepted (are encouraged) even if nominators do not send the name of the nominee by June 1st. 


__________________________________________________________________________

Nomination Guidelines and Criteria

Distinguished Professional Contributions, Distinguished Scientific Contributions, Distinguished Service Contributions, Distinguished Early Career Contributions, and Distinguished Teaching Contributions Awards

1. Nominations may be submitted by any member of SIOP, the American Psychological Association, the American Psychological Society, or by any person who is sponsored by a member of one of these organizations. Self-nominations are welcome.

2. Only members of SIOP may be nominated for the award.

3. A current vita of the nominee should accompany the letter of nomination. In addition, the nominator should include materials that illustrate the contributions of the nominee. Supporting letters may be included as part of the nomination packet. The number of supporting letters for any given nomination should be between a minimum of three and a maximum of five.

4. Nominees who are nonrecipients of the Distinguished Scientific Contributions Award, Distinguished Professional Contributions Award, and Distinguished Service Contributions Award will be reconsidered annually for 2 years after their initial nomination.

5. Ten copies of all submission materials are required. Letters of nomination, vita, and all supporting letters (including at least three and no more than five) or materials must be received by July 1, 2004.

Administrative Procedures

1. The SIOP Awards Committee will review the letters of nomination and all supporting materials of all nominees and make a recommendation concerning one or more nominees to the SIOP Executive Committee. Two or more nominees may be selected if their contributions are similarly distinguished.

2. The Executive Committee may either endorse or reject the recommendations of the Awards Committee but may not substitute a nominee of its own.

3. In the absence of a nominee who is deemed deserving of the award by both the Awards Committee and the Executive Committee, the award may be withheld.

Distinguished Professional Contributions Award

In recognition of outstanding contributions to the practice of industrial and organizational psychology.

The award is given to an individual who has developed, refined, and implemented practices, procedures, and methods that have had a major impact on both people in organizational settings and the profession of I-O psychology. The contributions of the individual should have advanced the profession by increasing the effectiveness of I-O psychologists working in business, industry, government, and other organizational settings.

The recipient of the award is given a plaque and a cash prize of $1,000. In addition, the recipient is invited to give an address, related to his or her contributions, at the subsequent meeting of SIOP.

Criteria for the Award

The letter of nomination should address the following points:

1. The general nature of the nominees contributions to the practice of
I-O psychology.

2. The contributions that the nominee has made to either (a) the development of practices, procedures, and methods, or (b) the implementation of practices, procedures, and methods. If appropriate, contributions of both types should be noted.

3. If relevant, the extent to which there is scientifically sound evidence to support the effectiveness of the relevant practices, procedures, and methods of the nominee.

4. The impact of the nominees contributions on the practice of I-O psychology.

5. The stature of the nominee as a practitioner vis--vis other prominent practitioners in the field of I-O psychology.

6. The evidence or documentation that is available to support the contributions of the nominee. Nominators should provide more than mere testimonials about the impact of a nominees professional contributions.

7. The extent to which the nominee has disseminated information about his or her methods, procedures, and practices through publications, presentations, workshops, and so forth. The methods, procedures, and practices must be both available to and utilized by other practicing I-O psychologists.

8. The organizational setting(s) of the nominees work (industry, government, academia, etc.) will not be a factor in selecting a winner of the award.

Distinguished Scientific Contributions Award

In recognition of outstanding contributions to the science of industrial and organizational psychology.

This award is given to the individual who has made the most distinguished empirical and/or theoretical scientific contributions to the field ofI-O psychology. The setting in which the nominee made the contributions (i.e., industry, academia, government) is not relevant.
The recipient of the award is given a plaque and a cash prize of $1,000. In addition, the recipient is invited to give an address that relates to his or her contributions at the subsequent meeting of SIOP.

Criteria for the Award

The letter of nomination should address the following issues:

1. The general nature of the nominees scientific contributions.

2. The most important theoretical and/or empirical contributions.

3. The impact of the nominees contributions on the science of I-O psychology, including the impact that the work has had on the work of students and colleagues.

4. The stature of the nominee as a scientist vis--vis other prominent scientists in the field of I-O psychology.

Distinguished Service Contributions Award

In recognition of sustained, significant, and outstanding service to the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

This award is given for sustained, significant, and outstanding service to SIOP. Service contributions can be made in a variety of ways which include but are not limited to serving as (a) an elected officer of the Society, (b) the chair of a standing or ad hoc committee of the Society, (c) a member of a standing or ad hoc committee of the Society, and (d) a formal representative of the Society to other organizations. The recipient is given a plaque and cash prize of $1,000.

Criteria for the Award

The letter of nomination should address the nature and quality of the nominees service contributions. A detailed history of the individuals service-oriented contributions should be provided. It should specify:

1. The offices held by the nominee.

2. The duration of his or her service in each such office.

3. The significant achievements of the nominee while an incumbent in each office.

Distinguished Early Career Contributions Award

In recognition of distinguished early career contributions to the science or practice of industrial and organizational psychology.

This award is given to an individual who has made distinguished contributions to the science and/or practice of I-O psychology within seven (7) years of receiving the PhD degree. In order to be considered for the 2005 award, nominees must have defended their dissertation no earlier than 1998. The setting in which the nominee has made the contributions (i.e., academia, government, industry) is not relevant.

The recipient of the award is given a plaque and a cash prize of $1,000. In addition, the recipient is invited to give an address that relates to his or her contribution at the subsequent meeting of SIOP.

Criteria for the Award

The letter of nomination should address the following issues:

1. The general nature of the nominees contributions to science and/or practice.

2. The most important contributions to science and/or practice.

3. The impact of the nominees contribution on the science and/or practice of I-O psychology, including the impact that the work has had on the work of students and colleagues.

4. The status of the nominee as a scientist and/or practitioner vis--vis other prominent scientists and/or practitioners in the field of I-O psychology.

5. While the number of publications is an important consideration, it is not the only one. An equally important criteria is the quality of the publications and their impact on the field of I-O psychology.

6. Documentation should be provided that indicates that the nominee received his or her PhD degree no earlier than 1998.

Distinguished Teaching Contributions Award

In recognition of SIOP members who demonstrate a sustained record of excellence in teaching, as revealed by excellence in the classroom or via Web-based teaching, student development, and community service via teaching.

The annual award will be given to full SIOP members who have sustained experience in a full-time university/college tenure-track or tenured position(s) requiring substantial teaching responsibilities. There is no restriction on the specific courses taught, only that the courses concern perspectives or applications of industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology. Nominations of individuals whose primary responsibilities lie in teaching undergraduates and terminal masters students are encouraged.

The recipient of the award is given a plaque and a cash prize of $1,000. In addition, the recipient is invited to give an address that relates to his or her contribution at the subsequent meeting of SIOP.

Criteria for Evaluation of Teaching

Although evidence of teaching excellence is likely to come from the total of all courses that one teaches, evidence of excellence in teaching I-O psychology courses or related areas is expected. The criteria are flexible and may involve the following:

1. Demonstration of excellence in teaching. Evidence for this might include course syllabi, lesson outlines, a statement of teaching philosophy, some form of student evaluation criteria (e.g., ratings) or receiving an award for teaching, examples of innovative methods in the design and delivery of course content, a summary of courses taught within the last 3 years (include title and short description of course, along with number of students enrolled), a video example of actual teaching, textbooks written, course handouts, letters from supervisor(s) or colleagues, and up to three letters of support from students.

2. Demonstration of student accomplishments. Evidence for this would include papers or projects completed by students, students presenting papers at professional meetings or students subsequently publishing their work done with the teacher, stimulation of student research, awards or grants received by students, students pursuing further graduate work, successful placement of students in jobs or graduate programs, careers or internships achieved by students, and other student-oriented activities (e.g., undergraduate student accomplishments will be highly valued).

3. Demonstration of excellence in teaching-related professional activities. Evidence for this might include publications of articles on teaching, memberships in teaching organizations, teaching awards and other forms of prior recognition, community presentations about topics related to industrial and organizational psychology, and attendance at professional meetings or workshops relevant to teaching.

The nomination packet should include (a) a current curriculum vitae, (b) a short biography, and (c) a teaching portfolio. The contents of the portfolio should include materials that address the criteria above.

Administration Procedures

1. A subcommittee (eight members) of the SIOP Awards Committee will review the nominations. At least four members shall work at colleges or universities focused primarily on undergraduate or masters level education.

2. The subcommittee will make a recommendation about the winning nomination to the SIOP Awards Committee, which will transmit the recommendation to the SIOP Executive Committee. If appropriate, nominators of meritorious nonwinning candidates will be contacted to see whether their candidates can be reconsidered for the award in the following year.

S. Rains Wallace Dissertation Research Award

In recognition of the best doctoral dissertation research in the field of industrial and organizational psychology.

This award is given to the person who completes the best doctoral dissertation research germane to the field of I-O psychology. The winning dissertation research should demonstrate the use of research methods that are both rigorous and creative. The winner of the award will receive a plaque, a cash prize of $1,000, and the opportunity to present their dissertation research in a poster session at the next meeting of SIOP.

Criteria for Evaluation and Submissions

Dissertation summaries will be evaluated in terms of the following criteria:

1. The degree to which the research addresses a phenomenon that is of significance to the field of I-O psychology.

2. The extent to which the research shows appropriate consideration of relevant theoretical and empirical literature. This should be reflected in both the formulation of hypotheses tested and the selection of methods used in their testing.

3. The degree to which the research has produced findings that have high levels of validity (i.e., internal, external, construct, and statistical conclusion). The setting of the proposed research is of lesser importance than its ability to yield highly valid conclusions about a real-world phenomenon of relevance to the field of I-O psychology. Thus, the methods of the research (including subjects, procedures, measures, manipulations, and data analytic strategies) should be specified in sufficient detail to allow for an assessment of the capacity of the proposed research to yield valid inferences.

4. The extent to which the author (a) offers reasonable interpretations of the results of his or her research, (b) draws appropriate inferences about the theoretical and applied implications of the same results, and (c) suggests promising directions for future research.

5. The degree to which the research yields information that is both practically and theoretically relevant and important.

6. The extent to which ideas in the proposal are logically, succinctly, and clearly presented.

Guidelines for Submission of Proposal

1. Entries may be submitted only by individuals who are endorsed (sponsored) by a member of SIOP, the American Psychological Society, or the American Psychological Association.

2. Each entrant should submit 10 copies of their paper (not to exceed 30 pages of double-spaced text) based on his or her dissertation. The name of the entrant, institutional affiliation, current mailing address, and phone number should appear only on the title page of the paper.

3. Papers are limited to a maximum of 30 double-spaced pages. This limit includes the title page, abstract, text, tables, figures, and appendices. However, it excludes references.

4. Papers should be prepared in accord with the guidelines provided in the fifth edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. Note, however, that the abstract may contain up to 300 words.

5. The paper must be based on a dissertation that was accepted by the graduate college 2 years or less before July 1, 2004, with the stipulation that an entrant may only submit once.

6. The entrant must provide a letter from his or her dissertation chair that specifies the date of acceptance of the dissertation by the graduate school of the institution and that the submission adequately represents all aspects of the completed dissertation. In addition, the entrant must provide a letter of endorsement from a member of SIOP, the American Psychological Society, or the American Psychological Association who is familiar with the entrants dissertation. Both of these letters may be from the same individual.

7. Entries (accompanied by supporting letters) must be received by July 1, 2004.

Administrative Procedures

1. All entries will be reviewed by the Awards Committee of SIOP.

2. The Awards Committee will make a recommendation to the Executive Committee of SIOP about the award-winning dissertation and, if appropriate, up to two dissertations deserving honorable mention status.

3. The Executive Committee may either endorse or reject the recommendations of the Awards Committee but may not substitute recommendations of its own.

4. In the absence of a dissertation that is deemed deserving of the award by both the Awards Committee and the Executive Committee, the award may be withheld.


William A. Owens Scholarly Achievement Award

In recognition of the best publication (appearing in a refereed journal) in the field of industrial and organizational psychology during the past full year (2003).

This annual award, honoring William A. Owens, is given to the author(s) of the publication in a refereed journal judged to have the highest potential to significantly impact the field of I-O psychology. There is no restriction on the specific journals in which the publication appears, only that the journal be refereed and that the publication concerns a topic of relevance to the field of I-O psychology. Only publications with a 2003 publication date will be considered.

The author(s) of the best publication is (are) awarded a plaque and a $1,000 cash prize (to be split in the case of multiple authors).

Criteria for Evaluation of Publications

Publications will be evaluated in terms of the following criteria:

1. The degree to which the research addresses a phenomenon that is of significance to the field of I-O psychology.

2. The potential impact or significance of the publication to the field of
I-O psychology.

3. The degree to which the research displays technical adequacy, including issues of internal validity, external validity, appropriate methodology, appropriate statistical analysis, comprehensiveness of review (if the publication is a literature review), and so forth.

Guidelines for Submission of Publications

1. Publications may be submitted by any member of SIOP, the American Psychological Society, the American Psychological Association, or by any person who is sponsored by a member of one of these organizations. Self- and other-nominations are welcome. The Owens Award Subcommittee may also generate nominations. Those evaluating the publications will be blind to the source of the nomination.

2. Publications having multiple authors are acceptable.

3. Ten copies of each publication should be submitted.

4. Publications must be received by July 1, 2004.

Administrative Procedures

1. Publications will be reviewed by a subcommittee of the Awards Committee of SIOP, consisting of at least six members.

2. The Awards Committee will make a recommendation to the Executive Committee of SIOP about the award-winning publication and, if appropriate, a publication deserving honorable mention status.

3. The Executive Committee may either endorse or reject the recommendations of the Awards Committee but may not substitute a nominee of its own.

4. In the absence of a publication that is deemed deserving of the award by both the Awards Committee and the Executive Committee, the award may be withheld.

M. Scott Myers Award for Applied Research in the Workplace

In recognition of a project or product representing an outstanding example of the practice of industrial and organizational psychology in the workplace.

This annual award, honoring M. Scott Myers, will be given to an individual practitioner or team of practitioners who have developed and conducted/applied a specific project or product representing an example of outstanding practice of I-O psychology in the workplace (i.e., business, industry, government). Projects must have been conducted in the workplace within the last 40 years and cover a time period of no more than 8 years. Products (e.g., tests, questionnaires, videos, software, but not books or articles) must be used in the workplace and developed within the last 40 years. Projects or products may be in any area of I-O psychology (e.g., compensation, employee relations, equal employment opportunity, human factors, job analysis, job design, organizational development, organizational behavior, leadership, position classification, safety, selection, training).

The award recipient(s) will receive a plaque commemorating the achievement, a cash prize of $1,000, and an invitation to make a presentation at the annual conference of SIOP. Team awards will be shared among the members of the team.

Criteria for Evaluation of Projects or Products

Nominations will be evaluated on the extent to which they:

1. Have a sound technical/scientific basis.

2. Advance objectives of clients/users.

3. Promote full use of human potential.

4. Comply with applicable psychological, legal, and ethical standards.

5. Improve the acceptance of I-O psychology in the workplace.

6. Show innovation and excellence.

Guidelines for Submission of Projects or Products

1. Nominations may be submitted by any member of SIOP. Self-nominations are welcome.

2. Individuals or teams may be nominated. Each individual nominee must be a current member of the Society. If a team is nominated, at least one of the team members must be a current member of the Society, and each team member must have made a significant contribution to the project or product.

3. Each nomination package must contain the following information:

a. A letter of nomination which explains how the project or product meets the six evaluation criteria above.

b. A technical report which describes the project or product in detail. This may be an existing report.

c. A description of any formal complaints of a legal or ethical nature which have been made regarding the project or product.

d. A list of three client references who may be contacted by the Myers Award Subcommittee regarding the project or product.

e. (Optional) Any other documentation which may be helpful for evaluating the nomination (e.g., a sample of the product, technical manuals, independent evaluations).

4. Nominees who are nonrecipients of the award will be reconsidered annually for 3 years after their initial nomination.

5. Eight copies of all nomination materials should be submitted. The Awards Committee will maintain the confidentiality of secure materials.

Administrative Procedures

1. Nomination materials will be reviewed by a subcommittee of the SIOP Awards Committee, consisting of at least three members, all of whom work primarily as I-O practitioners.

2. The Awards Committee will make a recommendation to the SIOP Executive Committee about the award-winning project or product.

3. The Executive Committee may either accept or reject the recommendation of the Awards Committee but may not substitute a nominee of its own.

4. In the absence of a nominee that is deemed deserving of the award by both the Awards Committee and the Executive Committee, the award may be withheld.

Past SIOP Award Recipients

Listed below are past SIOP award recipients as well as SIOP members who have received APA, APF, or APS awards.

Distinguished Professional Contributions Award

1977 Douglas W. Bray 1991  Charles H. Lawshe 
1978  Melvin Sorcher 1992  Gerald V. Barrett
1979  Award withheld 1993  Award withheld 
1980  Award withheld 1994  Patricia J. Dyer 
1981  Carl F. Frost 1995  Allen I. Kraut
1982  John Flanagan 1996  Erich Prien
1983  Edwin Fleishman 1997  John Hinrichs 
1984  Mary L. Tenopyr 1998  Gary P. Latham 
1985  Delmar L. Landen 1999  Lowell Hellervik 
1986  Paul W.Thayer 2000  Joseph L. Moses
1987  Paul Sparks 2001  David P. Campbell
1988  Herbert H. Meyer 2002  George C. Thornton III
1989  William C. Byham  2003  George P. Hollenbeck
1990 P. Richard Jeanneret

Distinguished Scientific Contributions Award

1983 William A. Owens 1995  Frank Schmidt & John Hunter 
1984  Patricia C. Smith 1996  Fred Fiedler
1985  Marvin D. Dunnette 1997  Charles L. Hulin 
1986  Ernest J. McCormick 1998  Terence Mitchell & Victor H. Vroom 
1987  Robert M. Guion 1999  Neal Schmitt 
1988  Raymond A. Katzell 2000  Benjamin Schneider 
1989  Lyman W. Porter 2001  Daniel R. Ilgen
1990  Edward J. Lawler III 2002  Gary P. Latham & Robert D. Pritchard 
1991  John P. Campbell 2003 Walter C. Borman & Paul R. Sackett
1992  J. Richard Hackman
1993  Edwin A. Locke 
1994  Bernard M. Bass 

Distinguished Service Contributions Award

1989  Richard J. Campbell & Mildred E. Katzell 1997  Ronald Johnson
1990  Paul W. Thayer 1998  Neal Schmitt 
1991 Mary L. Tenopyr 1999  Richard Klimoski & William Macey 
1992  Irwin L. Goldstein 2000  Paul Sackett 
1993  Robert M. Guion 2001  James Farr 
1994  Ann Howard 2002  Award withheld 
1995  Milton D. Hakel 2003 Award withheld
1996  Sheldon Zedeck 

Distinguished Early Career Contributions Award*

1992  John R. Hollenbeck  1998  Deniz S. Ones & Chockalingam Viswesvaran
1993  Raymond A. Noe  1999  Richard DeShon
1994  Cheri Ostroff  2000  Award withheld 
1995  Timothy A. Judge  2001  Daniel M. Cable & Jos Cortina
1996  Joseph Martocchio  2002  Michele J. Gelfand 
1997  Stephen Gilliland  2003 David Chan

*Prior to 2001, this award was named the Ernest J. McCormick Award for Distinguished Early Career Contributions.

William A. Owens Scholarly Achievement Award

1998  Avraham N. Kluger & Angelo S. DeNisi
1999  David Chan & Neal Schmitt
1999  Peter Dorfman, Jon Howell, Shozo Hibino, Jin Lee, Uday Tate, & Arnoldo Bautista
2000  Paul Tesluk & Rick Jacobs
2001  Timothy A. Judge, Chad A. Higgins, Carl J. Thoresen, & Murray R. Barrick
2002  E. Allan Lind, Gerald Greenberg, Kimberly S. Scott, & Thomas D. Welchans
2002 Elaine D. Pulakos, Sharon Arad, Michelle A. Donovan, & Kevin E. Plamondon
2003 Katherine J. Klein, Amy B. Conn, & Joann Speer Sorra


M. Scott Myers Award for Applied Research in the Workplace

1998  Frank L. Landy, James L. Farr, Edwin Fleishman, & Robert J. Vance
1999  Chris Hornick, Kathryn Fox, Ted Axton, Beverly Wyatt, & Therese Revitte
2000  HumRRO, PDRI, RGI, Caliber, & FAA
2001  Eduardo Salas, Janice A. Cannon-Bowers, Joan H. Johnston, Kimberly A. Smith-Jentsch, Carol Paris
2002  Norman G. Peterson, Michael D. Mumford, Walter C. Borman, P. Richard Jeanneret, & Edwin A. Fleishman
2003 Award withheld

 
Edwin E. Ghiselli Award for Research Design

1984  Max Bazerman & Henry Farber 1993  Elizabeth Weldon & Karen Jehn 
1985  Gary Johns 1994  Linda Simon & Thomas Lokar 
1986  Craig Russell & Mary Van Sell 1995  Award withheld 
1987  Sandra L. Kirmeyer 1996  Award withheld
1988  Award withheld 1997  Kathy Hanisch, Charles Hulin, & Steven Seitz 
1989  Kathy Hanisch & Charles Hulin 1998  David Chan
1990  Award withheld 1999  Award withheld
1991  Award withheld 2000  Award withheld
1992  Julie Olson & Peter Carnevale 2001* 
2002* 

*Award suspended due to lack of nominations.

 
S. Rains Wallace Dissertation Research Award

1970  Robert Pritchard 1987  Collette Frayne 
1971  Michael Wood 1988  Sandra J. Wayne
1972  William H. Mobley 1989  Leigh L. Thompson 
1973  Phillip W. Yetton 1990  Award withheld 
1974  Thomas Cochran 1991  Rodney A. McCloy 
1975  John Langdale 1992  Elizabeth W. Morrison 
1976  Denis Umstot  1993  Deborah F. Crown 
1977  William A. Schiemann 1994  Deniz S. Ones 
1978  Joanne Martin & Marilyn Morgan 1995  Chockalingam Viswesvaran 
1979  Stephen A. Stumpf  1996  Daniel Cable & Steffanie Wilk 
1980  Marino S. Basadur 1997  Tammy Allen 
1981  Award withheld 1998  David W. Dorsey & Paul E. Tesluk 
1982  Kenneth Pearlman  1999  Taly Dvir 
1983  Michael Campion 2000  Steven E. Scullen 
1984  Jill Graham  2001  Robert E. Ployhart
1985  Loriann Roberson  2002  Award withheld 
1986  Award withheld  2003  Mark G. Ehrhart

 
John C. Flanagan Award for Best Student Contribution at SIOP

1993  Susan I. Bachman, Amy B. Gross, Steffanie L. Wilk
1994  Lisa Finkelstein
1995  Joann Speer-Sorra
1996  Frederick L. Oswald & Jeff W. Johnson
1997  Syed Saad & Paul Sackett
1998  Frederick P. Morgeson & Michael A. Campion
1999  Chris Kubisiak, Mary Ann Hanson, & Daren Buck
2000  Kristen Horgen, Mary Ann Hanson, Walter Borman, & Chris Kubisiak
2001  Lisa M. Donahue, Donald Truxillo, & Lisa M. Finkelstein
2002  Remus Ilies
2003 Amy Colbert


Robert J. Wherry Award for the Best Paper at the IO/OB Conference

1980 Mary Anne Lahey 1994  Talya Bauer & Lynda Aiman-Smith
198182 Missing 1995  Mary Ann Hannigan &  Robert Sinclair 
1983  Maureen Ambrose  1996  Adam Stetzer &  David Hofmann 
198487 Missing  1997  Scott Behson & Edward P. Zuber, III 
1988  Christopher Reilly  1998  Dana Milanovich & Elizabeth Muniz
1989  Andrea Eddy 1999  Michael Grojean & Paul Hanges 
1990  Amy Shwartz, Wayne Hall, & J. Martineau 2000  Jennifer Palmer
1991  Paul Van Katwyk 2001   Steven M. Rumery 
1992  Sarah Moore-Hirschl 2002 Damon Bryant & Dahlia Forde
1993  Daniel Skarlicki 

SIOP Gold Medal Award

  2002          Lee Hakel

SIOP Members Who Have Received APA Awards

Award for Distinguished Professional Contributions

1976  John C. Flanagan 1991  Joseph D. Matarazzo 
1980  Douglas W. Bray 1992  Harry Levinson 
1989  Florence Kaslow 

 
Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology

1957  Carl I. Hovland 1972  Edwin E. Ghiselli 

 
Distinguished Scientific Award for the Applications of Psychology

1980  Edwin A. Fleishman 1987  Robert Glaser 
1983  Donald E. Super 1994   John E. Hunter & Frank Schmidt 


Distinguished Scientific Award for an Early Career Contribution to Psychology

1989  Ruth Kanfer 1994  Cheri Ostroff 


Award for Distinguished Contributions to the 
International Advancement of Psychology

1994  Harry C. Triandis 1999  Edwin A. Fleishman  


SIOP Members Who Have Received APF Awards 

Gold Medal Award for Life Achievement in the Application of Psychology

1986  Kenneth E. Clark 1993  John C. Flanagan 
1988  Morris S. Viteles 1994  Charles H. Lawshe 
1991  Douglas W. Bray  2004 Edwin A. Fleishman

 
SIOP Members Who Have Received APS Awards

James McKeen Cattell Fellow Award

1993  Edwin A. Fleishman, Robert Glaser, & Donald E. Super
1998  Harry C. Triandis
1999  Fred E. Fiedler & Robert J. Sternberg
2000  Robert M. Guion

 

April 2004 Table of Contents | TIP Home | SIOP Home