Missives
The Price or The Prince of Fame?
Ms. Waclawski,
I enjoyed reading your January Real World editorial on the TIP Web
site. Although I have not read Bings book, I have thumbed through it at my
local Borders. Is there anything better than having the actual book in your
hands? Actually yes, but I digress. It looked good natured and given your
comment regarding how funny it is, I will even consider reading it now.
On a serious note, the real question that must be asked whenever a
contemporary author uses/misuses Machiavelli, is: Did the author truly
understand what Machiavelli was doing in The Prince? Unfortunately the
answer is always no, and then Im left wondering if the people have read
The Prince and, if so, did they read any of the quality commentaries of
it (e.g. ,Leo Strauss). I dont want to sound pedantic, but to say that
Machiavelli can be distilled to the ends justifies the means is as
comprehensive as saying Freud was all about sex.
Is there wisdom in Machiavelli? Yes. How do we know? What, you wont take
my word for it? Ok...fine...well then, how about because the likes of Francis
Bacon and Nietzsche say so? Can all of us apply this wisdom to our everyday
lives and careers? No, because that was not the context for which The Prince was
written. What was the context? To paraphrase Socrates, Leadership writ
big.
Id love to continue this discussion, but since Im not sure anyone is
listening or cares to hear more, Ill stop now. I dont mind talking to
myself, but I abhor the idea of typing to myself. Id love to discuss the
existing leadership bankruptcy, but only if youre interested.
Take heart, because if history is a good example, the existing black plague
of leadership can be a precursor to a renaissance.
Regards,
Phil Amsrud
phil.amsrud@gte.net
April 2001 Table of Contents | TIP Home
| SIOP Home