Home Home | About Us | Sitemap | Contact  
  • Info For
  • Professionals
  • Students
  • Educators
  • Media
  • Search
    Powered By Google

Call for Nominations and Entries 2001 Awards for the
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

  • Distinguished Professional Contributions Award
  • Distinguished Scientific Contributions Award
  • Distinguished Service Contributions Award
  • Ernest J. McCormick Award for Distinguished Early Career Contributions
  • Edwin E. Ghiselli Award for Research Design
  • S. Rains Wallace Dissertation Award
  • William A. Owens Scholarly Achievement Award
  • M. Scott Myers Award for Applied Research in the Workplace

Deadline: September 15, 2000

Send nominations and entries for all awards to:

Timothy A. Judge
Chair, SIOP Awards Committee
College of Business 108 PBB
University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242-1000
(319) 335-3784
tim-judge@uiowa.edu

Nomination Guidelines and Criteria

Distinguished Professional Contributions, Distinguished Scientific Contributions, Distinguished Service Contributions, and the Ernest J. McCormick Early Career Contributions Awards

 

1. Nominations may be submitted by any member of SIOP, the American Psychological Association, the American Psychological Society, or by any person who is sponsored by a member of one of these organizations.

2. Only members of SIOP may be nominated for the award.

3. A current vita of the nominee should accompany the letter of nomination. In addition, the nominator should include materials that illustrate the contributions of the nominee. Supporting letters may be included as part of the nomination packet. The number of supporting letters for any given nomination should be between a minimum of three and a maximum of five.

4. Nominees who are nonrecipients of the Distinguished Scientific Contributions Award, Distinguished Professional Contributions Award, and Distinguished Service Contributions Award will be reconsidered annually for 2 years after their initial nomination.

5. Eight copies of all submission materials are required. Letters of nomination, vita, and all supporting letters (including at least three and no more than five) or materials must be received by September 15, 2000.

Administrative Procedures

1. The SIOP Awards Committee will review the letters of nomination and all supporting materials of all nominees and make a recommendation concerning one or more nominees to the SIOP Executive Committee. Two or more nominees may be selected if their contributions are similarly distinguished.

2. The Executive Committee may either endorse or reject the recommendations of the Awards Committee, but may not substitute a nominee of its own.

3. In the absence of a nominee who is deemed deserving of the award by both the Awards Committee and the Executive Committee, the award may be withheld.

Distinguished Professional Contributions Award

In recognition of outstanding contributions to the practice of industrial and organizational psychology.

The award is given to an individual who has developed, refined, and implemented practices, procedures, and methods that have had a major impact on both people in organizational settings and the profession of I-O psychology. The contributions of the individual should have advanced the profession by increasing the effectiveness of I-O psychologists working in business, industry, government, and other organizational settings.

The recipient of the award is given a plaque and a cash prize of $1,000. In addition, the recipient is invited to give an address, related to his or her contributions, at the subsequent meeting of SIOP.

Criteria for the Award

The letter of nomination should address the following points:

1. The general nature of the nominee's contributions to the practice of I-O psychology.

2. The contributions that the nominee has made to either (a) the development of practices, procedures, and methods, or (b) the implementation of practices, procedures, and methods. If appropriate, contributions of both types should be noted.

3. If relevant, the extent to which there is scientifically sound evidence to support the effectiveness of the relevant practices, procedures, and methods of the nominee.

4. The impact of the nominee's contributions on the practice of I-O psychology.

5. The stature of the nominee as a practitioner vis--vis other prominent practitioners in the field of I-O psychology.

6. The evidence or documentation that is available to support the contributions of the nominee. Nominators should provide more than mere testimonials about the impact of a nominee's professional contributions.

7. The extent to which the nominee has disseminated information about his or her methods, procedures, and practices through publications, presentations, workshops, and so forth. The methods, procedures, and practices must be both available to and utilized by other practicing I-O psychologists.

8. The organizational setting(s) of the nominee's work (industry, government, academia, etc.) will not be a factor in selecting a winner of the award.

Distinguished Scientific Contributions Award

In recognition of outstanding contributions to the science of industrial and organizational psychology.

This award is given to the individual who has made the most distinguished empirical and/or theoretical scientific contributions to the field of I-O psychology. The setting in which the nominee made the contributions (i.e., industry, academia, government) is not relevant.

The recipient of the award is given a plaque and a cash prize of $1,000. In addition, the recipient is invited to give an address, that relates to his or her contributions, at the subsequent meeting of SIOP.

Criteria for the Award

The letter of nomination should address the following issues:

1. The general nature of the nominee's scientific contributions.

2. The most important theoretical and/or empirical contributions.

3. The impact of the nominee's contributions on the science of I-O psychology, including the impact that the work has had on the work of students and colleagues.

4. The stature of the nominee as a scientist vis-a-vis other prominent scientists in the field of I-O psychology.

Distinguished Service Contributions Award

In recognition of sustained, significant, and outstanding service to the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

This award is given for sustained, significant, and outstanding service to SIOP. Service contributions can be made in a variety of ways which include but are not limited to serving as (a) an elected officer of the Society, (b) the chair of a standing or ad hoc committee of the Society, (c) a member of a standing or ad hoc committee of the Society, and (d) a formal representative of the Society to other organizations. The recipient is given a plaque and cash prize of $1,000.

Criteria for the Award

The letter of nomination should address the nature and quality of the nominee's service contributions. A detailed history of the individual's service-oriented contributions should be provided. It should specify:

1. The offices held by the nominee

2. The duration of his or her service in each such office

3. The significant achievements of the nominee while an incumbent in each office.

Ernest J. McCormick Award for
Distinguished Early Career Contributions

In recognition of distinguished early career contributions to the science or practice of industrial and organizational psychology.

This award is given to an individual who has made distinguished contributions to the science and/or practice of I-O psychology within seven (7) years of receiving the PhD degree. In order to be considered for the 2001 Award, nominees must have defended their dissertation no earlier than 1994. The setting in which the nominee has made the contributions (i.e., academia, government, industry) is not relevant.

The recipient of the award is given a plaque and a cash prize of $1,000. In addition, the recipient is invited to give an address, that relates to his or her contribution, at the subsequent meeting of SIOP.

Criteria for the Award

The letter of nomination should address the following issues:

1. The general nature of the nominee's contributions to science and/or practice.

2. The most important contributions to science and/or practice.

3. The impact of the nominee's contribution on the science and/or practice of I-O psychology, including the impact that the work has had on the work of students and colleagues.

4. The status of the nominee as a scientist and/or practitioner vis--vis other prominent scientists and/or practitioners in the field of I-O psychology.

5. While the number of publications is an important consideration, it is not the only one. An equally important criteria is the quality of the publications and their impact on the field of I-O psychology.

Documentation should be provided that indicates that the nominee received his or her PhD degree no earlier than 1994.

Edwin E. Ghiselli Award for Research Design

In recognition of the research proposal that best shows the use of scientific methods in the study of a phenomenon that is relevant to the field of industrial and organizational psychology.

The award is given to the author(s) of the best research proposal in which scientific methods are used to study a phenomenon of relevance to the field of I-O psychology. The proposal should demonstrate the use of research methods that are rigorous, creative, and highly appropriate to the study of the phenomenon that is the focus of the proposed research. The proposal should cover research that is at either the design stage or is in very early stages of pilot-testing. Proposals covering completed research should not be submitted.

The author(s) of the best proposal is (are) awarded a plaque, a $1,000 cash prize, and the opportunity to present their proposal in a poster session at the meeting of SIOP. In addition, the Scientific Affairs Committee of the SIOP will assist the winner in both obtaining funding and locating sites for the conduct of the proposed research. This offer of assistance, however, does not obligate the award winner(s) to actually perform the proposed research.

If more than one outstanding research proposal is submitted for review, the Awards Committee may recommend that an otherwise outstanding, but not a winning, proposal be awarded honorable mention status.

Criteria for Evaluation of Proposals

Research proposals will be evaluated in terms of the following criteria:

1. The degree to which the proposed research addresses a phenomenon that is of significance to the field of I-O psychology.

2. The extent to which the proposal shows appropriate consideration of the relevant theoretical and empirical literature.

3. The degree to which the proposed research will produce findings that have high levels of validity (i.e., internal, external, construct, and statistical conclusion). The setting of the proposed research is of lesser importance than the capacity of the study to produce highly valid conclusions about a real-world phenomenon of relevance to the field of I-O psychology. The methods of the proposed research (including subjects, procedures, measures, manipulations, and data analytic strategies) should be specified in sufficient detail to allow for an assessment of the capacity of the proposed research to yield valid inferences.

4. The extent to which the proposed research is actually capable of being conducted.

5. The degree to which the proposed research, regardless of its outcomes, will produce information that is both practical and theoretical in relevance.

6. The extent to which ideas in the proposal are logically, succinctly, and clearly presented.

7. The degree to which the proposal provides for the appropriate coverage and consideration of (a) research objectives, (b) relevant theoretical and empirical literature, and (c) research methods. Note that a budget for the proposed research should not be submitted.

Guidelines for Submission of Proposal

1. Proposals may be submitted by any member of the SIOP, the American Psychological Society, the American Psychological Association, or by any person who is sponsored by a member of one of these organizations.

2. Proposals having multiple authors are acceptable.

3. Proposals are limited to 30 double-spaced pages. This limit includes the title page, abstract, tables, figures, and so forth, but excludes references.

4. Proposals should be prepared in accord with the guidelines provided in the fourth edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. Note, however, that the abstract may contain up to 300 words.

5. Ten copies of each proposal should be submitted. The name of the author, affiliation (academic institution, business firm, or government agency), and phone number should appear only on the title page of the proposal.

6. No award-winning proposal (actual winner or honorable mention) may be resubmitted for review. However, nonwinning entries that were submitted in previous years may be resubmitted.

7. Individuals who have previously won the award are eligible to submit proposals covering research other than that in their award winning proposal(s). However, to win an award a third time, the author must show evidence of having completed at least one or two previously proposed studies.

8. Proposals must be received by September 15, 2000.

Administrative Procedures

1. Proposals will be reviewed by the Awards Committee of SIOP.

2. The Awards Committee will make a recommendation to the Executive Committee of SIOP about the award winning proposal and, if appropriate, a proposal deserving honorable mention status.

3. The Executive Committee may either endorse or reject the recommendations of the Awards Committee, but may not substitute a nominee of its own.

4. In the absence of a proposal that is deemed deserving of the award by both the Awards Committee and the Executive Committee, the award may be withheld.

S. Rains Wallace Dissertation Research Award

In recognition of the best doctoral dissertation research in the field of industrial and organizational psychology.

This award is given to the person who completes the best doctoral dissertation research germane to the field of I-O psychology. The winning dissertation research should demonstrate the use of research methods that are both rigorous and creative. The winner of the award will receive a plaque, a cash prize of $1,000, and the opportunity to present their dissertation research in a poster session at the next meeting of SIOP.

Criteria for Evaluation and Submissions

Dissertation summaries will be evaluated in terms of the following criteria:

1. The degree to which the research addresses a phenomenon that is of significance to the field of I-O psychology.

2. The extent to which the research shows appropriate consideration of relevant theoretical and empirical literature. This should be reflected in both the formulation of hypotheses tested and the selection of methods used in their testing.

3. The degree to which the research has produced findings that have high levels of validity (i.e., internal, external, construct, and statistical conclusion). The setting of the proposed research is of lesser importance than its ability to yield highly valid conclusions about a real-world phenomenon of relevance to the field of I-O psychology. Thus, the methods of the research (including subjects, procedures, measures, manipulations, and data analytic strategies) should be specified in sufficient detail to allow for an assessment of the capacity of the proposed research to yield valid inferences.

4. The extent to which the author (a) offers reasonable interpretations of the results of his or her research, (b) draws appropriate inferences about the theoretical and applied implications of the same results, and (c) suggests promising directions for future research.

5. The degree to which the research yields information that is both practically and theoretically relevant and important.

6. The extent to which ideas in the proposal are logically, succinctly, and clearly presented.

Guidelines for Submission of Proposal

1. Entries may be submitted only by individuals who are endorsed (sponsored) by a member of SIOP, the American Psychological Society, or the American Psychological Association.

2. Each entrant should submit 10 copies of their paper (not to exceed 30 pages of double-spaced text) based on his or her dissertation. The name of the entrant, institutional affiliation, current mailing address, and phone number should appear only on the title page of the paper.

3. Papers are limited to a maximum of 30 double-spaced pages. This limit includes the title page, abstract, text, tables, figures, and appendices. However, it excludes references.

4. Papers should be prepared in accord with the guidelines provided in the fourth edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. Note, however, that the abstract may contain up to 300 words.

5. The paper must be based on a dissertation that was accepted by the graduate college 2 years or less before September 15, 2000, with the stipulation than an entrant may only submit once.

6. The entrant must provide a letter from his or her dissertation chair that specifies the date of acceptance of the dissertation by the graduate school of the institution and that the submission adequately represents all aspects of the completed dissertation. In addition, the entrant must provide a letter of endorsement from a member of SIOP, the American Psychology Society, or the American Psychological Association who is familiar with the entrant's dissertation. Both of these letters may be from the same individual.

7. Entries (accompanied by supporting letters) must be received by September 15, 2000.

Administrative Procedures

1. All entries will be reviewed by the Awards Committee of SIOP.

2. The Awards Committee will make a recommendation to the Executive Committee of SIOP about the award winning dissertation and, if appropriate, up to two dissertations deserving honorable mention status.

3. The Executive Committee may either endorse or reject the recommendations of the Awards Committee, but may not substitute recommendations of its own.

4. In the absence of a dissertation that is deemed deserving of the award by both the Awards Committee and the Executive Committee, the award may be withheld.

William A. Owns Scholarly Achievement Award

In recognition of the best publication (appearing in a refereed journal) in the field of industrial and organizational psychology during the past full year (1999).

This annual award, honoring William A. Owens, is given to the author(s) of the publication in a refereed journal judged to have the highest potential to significantly impact the field of I-O Psychology. There is no restriction on the specific journals in which the publication appears, only that the journal be refereed and that the publication concerns a topic of relevance to the field of I-O psychology. Only publications with a 1999 publication date will be considered.

The author(s) of the best publication is (are) awarded a plaque and a $1,000 cash prize (to be split in the case of multiple authors).

Criteria for Evaluation of Publications

Publications will be evaluated in terms of the following criteria:

1. The degree to which the research addresses a phenomenon that is of significance to the field of I-O psychology.

2. The potential impact or significance of the publication to the field of I-O psychology.

3. The degree to which the research displays technical adequacy, including issues of internal validity, external validity, appropriate methodology, appropriate statistical analysis, comprehensiveness of review (if the publication is a literature review), and so forth.

Guidelines for Submission of Publications

1. Publications may be submitted by any member of SIOP, the American Psychological Society, the American Psychological Association, or by any person who is sponsored by a member of one of these organizations. Self- and other-nominations are welcome. The Owens Award subcommittee may also generate nominations. Those evaluating the publications will be blind to the source of the nomination.

2. Publications having multiple authors are acceptable.

3. Ten copies of each publication should be submitted.

4. Publications must be received by September 15, 2000.

Administrative Procedures

1. Publications will be reviewed by a subcommittee of the Awards Committee of SIOP, consisting of at least six members.

2. The Awards Committee will make a recommendation to the Executive Committee of SIOP about the award winning publication and, if appropriate, a publication deserving honorable mention status.

3. The Executive Committee may either endorse or reject the recommendations of the Awards Committee, but may not substitute a nominee of its own.

4. In the absence of a publication that is deemed deserving of the award by both the Awards Committee and the Executive Committee, the award may be withheld.

M. Scott Myers Award for Applied Research in the Workplace

In recognition of a project or product representing an outstanding example of the practice of industrial and organizational psychology in the workplace.

This annual award, honoring M. Scott Myers, will be given to an individual practitioner or team of practitioners who have developed and conducted/applied a specific project or product representing an example of outstanding practice of I-O psychology in the workplace (i.e., business, industry, government). Projects must have been conducted in the workplace within the last 40 years and cover a time period of no more than 8 years. Products (e.g., tests, questionnaires, videos, software, but not books or articles) must be used in the workplace and developed within the last 40 years. Projects or products may be in any area of I-O psychology (e.g., compensation, employee relations, equal employment opportunity, human factors, job analysis, job design, organizational development, organizational behavior, leadership, position classification, safety, selection, training).

The award recipient(s) will receive a plaque commemorating the achievement, a cash prize of $1,000, and an invitation to make a presentation at the Annual Conference of SIOP. Team awards will be shared among the members of the team.

Criteria for Evaluation of Projects or Products

Nominations will be evaluated on the extent to which they:

1. Have a sound technical/scientific basis.

2. Advance objectives of clients/users.

3. Promote full use of human potential.

4. Comply with applicable psychological, legal, and ethical standards.

5. Improve the acceptance of I-O psychology in the workplace.

6. Show innovation and excellence.

Guidelines for Submission of Projects or Products

1. Nominations may be submitted by any member of SIOP. Self-nominations are welcome.

2. Individuals or teams may be nominated. Each individual nominee must be a current member of the Society. If a team is nominated, at least one of the team members must be a current member of the Society, and each team member must have made a significant contribution to the project or product.

3. Each nomination package must contain the following information:

(a) A letter of nomination which explains how the project or product meets the six evaluation criteria above.

(b) A technical report which describes the project or product in detail. This may be an existing report.

(c) A description of any formal complaints of a legal or ethical nature which have been made regarding the project or product.

(d) A list of three client references who may be contacted by the Myers Award subcommittee regarding the project or product.

(e) (Optional) Any other documentation which may be helpful for evaluating the nomination (e.g., a sample of the product, technical manuals, independent evaluations).

4. Six copies of all nomination materials should be submitted. The Awards Committee will maintain the confidentiality of secure materials.

Administrative Procedures

1. Nomination materials will be reviewed by a subcommittee of the SIOP Awards Committee, consisting of at least three members, all of whom work primarily as I-O practitioners.

2. The Awards Committee will make a recommendation to the SIOP Executive Committee about the award-winning project or product.

3. The Executive Committee may either accept or reject the recommendation of the Awards Committee, but may not substitute a nominee of its own.

4. In the absence of a nominee that is deemed deserving of the award by both the Awards Committee and the Executive Committee, the award may be withheld.

PAST SIOP AWARD RECIPIENTS

Listed below are past SIOP award recipients as well as SIOP members who have received APA, APF, or APS awards.

DISTINGUISHED PROFESSIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS AWARD

1977 Douglas W. Bray 1989 William C. Byham

1978 Melvin Sorcher 1990 P. Richard Jeanneret

1979 Award withheld 1991 Charles H. Lawshe

1980 Award withheld 1992 Gerald V. Barrett

1981 Carl F. Frost 1993 Award withheld

1982 John Flanagan 1994 Patricia J. Dyer

1983 Edwin Fleishman 1995 Allen I. Kraut

1984 Mary L. Tenopyr 1996 Erich Prien

1985 Delmar L. Landen 1997 John Hinrichs

1986 Paul W.Thayer 1998 Gary P. Latham

1987 Paul Sparks 1999 Lowell Hellervik

1988 Herbert H. Meyer

DISTINGUISHED SCIENTIFIC CONTRIBUTIONS AWARD

1983 William A. Owens 1992 J. Richard Hackman

1984 Patricia C. Smith 1993 Edwin A. Locke

1985 Marvin D. Dunnette 1994 Bernard M. Bass

1986 Ernest J. McCormick 1995 Frank Schmidt & John Hunter

1987 Robert M. Guion 1996 Fred Fiedler

1988 Raymond A. Katzell 1997 Charles Hulin

1989 Lyman W. Porter 1998 Terence Mitchell &

1990 Edward J. Lawler III Victor H. Vroom

1991 John P. Campbell 1999 Neal Schmitt

DISTINGUISHED SERVICE CONTRIBUTIONS AWARD

1989 Richard J. Campbell & 1994 Ann Howard

Mildred E. Katzell 1995 Milton D. Hakel

1990 Paul W. Thayer 1996 Sheldon Zedeck

1991 Mary L. Tenopyr 1997 Ronald Johnson

1992 Irwin L. Goldstein 1998 Neal Schmitt

1993 Robert M. Guion 1999 Richard Klimoski &

William Macey

ERNEST J. MCCORMICK AWARD FOR DISTINGUISHED EARLY CAREER CONTRIBUTIONS

1992 John R. Hollenbeck 1995 Timothy Judge

1993 Raymond A. Noe 1996 Joseph Martocchio

1994 Cheri Ostroff 1997 Stephen Gilliland

1998 Deniz S. Ones & 1999 Richard DeShon

Chockalingam Viswesvaran

WILLIAM A. OWENS SCHOLARLY ACHIEVEMENT AWARD

1998 Avraham N. Kluger & Angelo S. DeNisi

1999 David Chan & Neal Schmitt

1999 Peter Dorfman, Jon Howell, Shozo Hibino, Jin Lee, Uday Tate, & Arnoldo Bautista

M. SCOTT MYERS AWARD FOR APPLIED RESEARCH IN THE WORKPLACE

1998 Frank L. Landy, James L. Farr, Edwin Fleishman, & Robert J. Vance

1999 Chris Hornick, Kathryn Fox, Ted Axton, Beverly Wyatt, and Therese

Revitte

EDWIN E. GHISELLI AWARD FOR RESEARCH DESIGN

1984 Max Bazerman & 1991 Award withheld

Henry Farber 1992 Julie Olson & Peter Carnevale

1985 Gary Johns 1993 Elizabeth Weldon & Karen Jehn

1986 Craig Russell & 1994 Linda Simon & Thomas Lokar

Mary Van Sell 1995 Award withheld

1987 Sandra L. Kirmeyer 1996 Award withheld

1988 Award withheld 1997 Kathy Hanisch, Charles Hulin, &

1989 Kathy Hanisch & Steven Seitz

Charles Hulin 1998 David Chan

1990 Award withheld 1999 Award withheld

S. RAINS WALLACE DISSERTATION RESEARCH AWARD

1985 Loriann Roberson

1971 Michael Wood 1986 Award withheld

1972 William H. Mobley 1987 Collette Frayne

1973 Phillip W. Yetton 1988 Sandra J. Wayne

1974 Thomas Cochran 1989 Leigh L. Thompson

1975 John Langdale 1990 Award withheld

1970 Robert Pritchard

1976 Denis Umstot 1991 Rodney A. McCloy

1977 William A. Schiemann 1992 Elizabeth W. Morrison

1978 Joanne Martin & 1993 Deborah F. Crown

Marilyn Morgan 1994 Deniz S. Ones

1979 Stephen A. Stumpf 1995 Chockalingam Viswesvaran

1980 Marino S. Basadur 1996 Steffanie Wilk & Daniel Cable

1981 Award withheld 1997 Tammy Allen

1982 Kenneth Pearlman 1998 David W. Dorsey & Paul E. Tesluk

1983 Michael Campion 1999 Taly Dvir

1984 Jill Graham

JOHN C. FLANAGAN AWARD FOR BEST STUDENT CONTRIBUTION AT SIOP

1993 Susan I. Bachman, Amy B. Gross, Steffanie L. Wilk

1994 Lisa Finkelstein

1995 Joann Speer-Sorra

1996 Frederick L. Oswald & Jeff W. Johnson

1997 Syed Saad & Paul Sackett

1998 Frederick P. Morgeson & Michael A. Campion

1999 Chris Kubisiak, Mary Ann Hanson, & Daren Buck

ROBERT J. WHERRY AWARD FOR THE BEST PAPER AT THE
I-O/OB CONFERENCE

SIOP MEMBERS WHO HAVE RECEIVED APA AWARDS

AWARD FOR DISTINGUISHED CONTRIBUTIONS TO EDUCATION IN PSYCHOLOGY

1973 James B. Maas

1980-82 Missing

1983 Maureen Ambrose

1984-87 Missing

1988 Christopher Reilly

1989 Andrea Eddy

1990 Amy Shwartz, Wayne Hall, J. Martineau & R.Sinclair

1991 Paul Van Katwyk

1992 Sarah Moore-Hirschl

1993 Daniel Skarlicki
1994 Talya Bauer & Lynda Aiman-Smith

1995 Mary Ann Hannigan

1996 Adam Stetzer & David Hofmann

1997 Scott Behson & Edward P. Zuber, III

1998 Dana Milanovich & Elizabeth Muniz

AWARD FOR DISTINGUISHED PROFESSIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS

1976 John C. Flanagan 1991 Joseph D. Matarazzo

1980 Douglas W. Bray 1992 Harry Levinson

1989 Florence Kaslow

AWARD FOR DISTINGUISHED SCIENTIFIC CONTRIBUTIONS TO PSYCHOLOGY

1957 Carl I. Hovland 1972 Edwin E. Ghiselli

AWARD FOR DISTINGUISHED SCIENTIFIC CONTRIBUTION FOR THE APPLICATIONS OF PSYCHOLOGY

1980 Edwin A. Fleishman 1987 Robert Glaser

1983 Donald E. Super 1994 John E. Hunter & Frank Schmidt

AWARD FOR DISTINGUISHED EARLY CAREER CONTRIBUTIONS TO PSYCHOLOGY

1989 Ruth Kanfer 1994 Cheri Ostroff

SIOP MEMBERS WHO HAVE RECEIVED APF AWARDS

GOLD MEDAL AWARD FOR LIFE ACHIEVEMENT IN THE APPLICATION OF PSYCHOLOGY

1986 Kenneth E. Clark 1993 John C. Flanagan

1988 Morris S. Viteles 1994 Charles H. Lawshe

1991 Douglas W. Bray

SIOP MEMBERS WHO HAVE RECEIVED APS AWARDS

JAMES MCKEEN CATTELL FELLOW AWARD

1993 Edwin A. Fleishman

Robert Glaser

Donald E. Super

 


April 2000 Table of Contents | TIP Home | SIOP Home