2.
Symposium: Friday, 10:30 12:20
Grande Ballroom A (E)
Emotional
Intelligence: Applications and Issues for Organizations
Issues in the definition and application of Emotional
Intelligence (EI) will be addressed. We
will begin with a review of the case for EI, then an argument that it is nothing
new and lacks validity. Additional
research and discussion will explore how I-O psychology can provide the rigorous
analysis required to determine the validity of this popular construct.
Ronald C. Page, Page & Associates, Inc., Chair
Richard E. Boyatzis, Case Western Reserve University, Emotional
Intelligence: What Is It and Can It Be Improved?
Gerald V. Barrett, Barrett & Associates, Inc., Emotional
Intelligence: The Madison Avenue Approach to Professional Practice
Neal M. Ashkanasy, University of Queensland, The
Case for Emotional Intelligence in Workgroups
Ronald C. Page, Page & Associates, Inc.,
Kenneth B. Little, Northern States Power Co., Emotional
Intelligence: How Does It Relate to Managerial Effectiveness?
Steven H. Brown, LIMRA International, Discussant
Lyle Spencer, Spencer Research & Technology, Discussant
3.
Symposium: Friday, 10:30 11:50
Grande Ballroom B (E)
Computers
= Good? How Test-User and Test-Taker
Perceptions Affect Technology-Based Employment Testing
This symposium deals
with technology-based employment testing, where the reality of accurate and
time- and cost-efficient testing can either be advanced or hindered by the test
perceptions of both applicant and employer.
Perceptions are shown to have a critical influence on the acceptability,
validity, and utility of personnel selection systems.
Frederick L. Oswald, Michigan State University, Chair
Jeffrey M. Stanton, Bowling Green State University,
Steven Rogelberg, Bowling Green State University, Challenges
and Obstacles in Conducting Employment Testing via the Internet
Douglas H. Reynolds, DDI, Evan Sinar, Development Dimensions
International, Applicant Reactions to Internet-Based Selection Techniques
Darin Wiechmann, Michigan State University,
Ann Marie Ryan, Michigan State University, Applicant
Reactions to Novel Selection Tools
Alan D. Mead, IPAT, How
Well Does Web-Based Testing Work? Results of a Survey of Users of NetAssess
Jim McBride, HumRRO, Discussant
4.
Panel Discussion: Friday, 10:30 12:20
Grande Ballroom C (E)
Everything
You Want to Know About Being an Expert Witness
Panelists will provide information on the basic
competencies required to perform well as an Expert Witness. Information will
also be provided on the opportunities, challenges, and frustrations that Expert
Witnesses face. Additionally, information that all Expert Witnesses
should know (e.g., the Daubert Standard) will be discussed.
Mary L. Connerley, Virginia Tech, Chair
Richard D. Arvey, University of Minnesota, Panelist
Wayne F. Cascio, University of Colorado, Graduate School
of Business, Panelist
Michael M. Harris, University of Missouri, Panelist
Leaetta M. Hough, The Dunnette Group, Ltd., Panelist
P. Richard Jeanneret, Jeanneret & Associates, Inc., Panelist
5.
Practitioner Forum: Friday, 10:30 11:50
Harbor Island I (E)
Strategic
Evaluation: Methods for Assessing the Impact of I-O Interventions on Business
Critical Objectives
A growing trend in I-O psychology is to evaluate program
effectiveness in business terms. Evaluation
methods are as varied as the programs themselves.
We present four unique cases where an I-O-based program was evaluated for
business-related outcomes, and results were used for program enhancements and/or
to expand the program.
Dale S. Rose, 3D Group, Chair
Diana Stewart, Nokia, The Impact of Assessment Center
Feedback on Business Measures at a Retail Chain: A Case Study
Marco L. E. Cavazzoni, The Boeing Company, The
Boeing Executive Program: A Study of its Impact on Leadership Behavior
Ronald W. Stoffey, Kutztown University,
Katherine L. Bittner, PsyCor, Inc., Assessment
of Performance Management Process at a Large Northeastern Utility: A Case Study
Mary Mannion-Plunkett, The Boeing Company,
Paul R. Yost, The Boeing Company,
Robert B. McKenna, Seattle Pacific University, Jim Eckels, Seattle Pacific University, Evaluating
the Impact of Corporate Leadership Development Programs: Practitioner
Perspectives from the Boeing Leadership Center
Matthew J. Paese, Development Dimensions International, Discussant
6.
Symposium: Friday, 10:30 12:20
Harbor Island II (E)
Towards
an Understanding of Variability Within Groups and Organizations
Variability among group or organization members
attitudes, perceptions, personalities, and demographic characteristics may have important
implications for group or organization effectiveness. We explore conceptual and methodological issues arising from
a focus on differences within groups and organizations and present new research findings on
the topic.
Katherine J. Klein, University of Maryland, Co-Chair
Jessica Lynne Saltz, University of Maryland, Co-Chair
Ellen G. Godfrey, University of Maryland, Co-Chair
Katherine J. Klein, University of Maryland,
Jessica Lynne Saltz, University of Maryland,
Ellen G. Godfrey, University of Maryland, Amy N. Salvaggio, University of Maryland, Studying
Dispersion in Organizations: Common Perspectives, Questions, and Challenges
Michael K. Lindell, Texas A&M University,
Lawrence R. James, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Assessing
Climate Consensus Effects Using Multiple Moment Analysis and WABA
Dora C. Lau, University of British Columbia,
J. Keith Murnighan, Northwestern University, Exploring
Compositional Dynamics of Demographic Faultlines: An Empirical Study
Joann Speer Sorra, Westat, A Subcultural Perspective on Work
Unit Cooperation and Conflict
Jeffrey R. Edwards, University of North Carolina, Discussant
7.
Symposium: Friday, 10:30 11:50
Harbor Island III (E)
Situational
Judgment Tests: What Constructs are We Measuring?
Although it seems obvious that situational judgment tests
to a large extent assess judgment or cognitive ability, clear evidence is
mounting that other constructs are being measured as well. In addition, the
constructs that are assessed by situational judgment tests often vary among
different tests.
Michael A. Campion, Purdue University, Chair
Deborah Ann Elias, Aon Consulting, Elizabeth L. Shoenfelt, Western
Kentucky University, Use
of a Situational Judgment Test to
Measure Teamwork Components and Their Relationship to Overall Teamwork
Performance
James C. Beaty, ePredix, Constructs Measured by a
Situational Judgment Test Designed to Assess Management Potential
Nhung T. Nguyen, Virginia Commonwealth University,
Michael A. McDaniel, Work Skills First, Inc., Constructs
Assessed in Situational Judgment Tests: A Meta-Analysis
Robert E. Ployhart, University of Maryland,
Mark Ehrhart, University of Maryland, Effects of Response Instructions on the Criterion-Related Validity,
Construct Validity, and Reliability of Situational Judgment Tests
Frank L. Schmidt, University of Iowa, Discussant
8.
Panel Discussion: Friday, 10:30 11:50
Executive Center 3 (E)
Collecting
Organizational Data as a Student:
Academic and Practitioner Perspectives
This panel discussion will focus on issues that graduate
students will face when collecting organizational data.
We will explore several topics, such as entry into the organization,
negotiation tactics, potential pitfalls/problems, and efforts to maximize the
benefits for both parties.
Cara Bauer, Wayne State University, Co-Chair
Jacki LaGanke, Wayne State University, Co-Chair
Marcus W. Dickson, Wayne State University, Co-Chair
Bernard G. Bedon, Towers Perrin, Panelist
Thomas R. Giberson, Wayne State University, Panelist
Marilyn K. Gowing, Assessment Solutions, Inc., Panelist
Greg R. Oldham, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign,
Panelist
David H. Oliver, GTE, Panelist
Neal W. Schmitt, Michigan State University, Panelist
9.
Symposium: Friday, 10:30 12:20
Marina 2 (E)
Racial/Ethnic
Discrimination and Harassment: Methodology,
Measurement, and Results
Recent research has highlighted the seriousness of
racial/ethnic harassment and discrimination.
To curtail this workplace problem, we need a better understanding of its
basic issues including structure, differences across races, and antecedent
factors and workplace effects. These
issues are examined within
the context of the U.S. military.
Fritz Drasgow, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign, Chair
Jacquelyn Scarville, Defense Manpower Data Center,
Timothy W. Elig, Defense Manpower Data Center, Anita Lancaster, Defense Manpower Data Center,
Scott B. Button, American Institutes for Research, Jack E. Edwards, U.S. General Accounting Office, The
U.S. Department of Defense Equal Opportunity Survey: Methodology and Findings
Alayne J. Ormerod, University of Illinois-Urbana
Champaign, Mindy
Bergman, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign, Patrick A. Palmieri, University of
Illinois-Urbana Champaign, Fritz Drasgow, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign, Structure
of Racial/Ethnic Harassment and Discrimination in the Military
Mindy Bergman, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign,
Patrick A. Palmieri, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign, Fritz Drasgow, University of Illinois-Urbana
Champaign, Alayne
J. Ormerod, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign, Assessing Racial and Ethnic
Harassment in Diverse Populations
Patrick A. Palmieri, University of Illinois-Urbana
Champaign, Alayne
J. Ormerod, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign, Fritz Drasgow, University of
Illinois-Urbana Champaign, Mindy Bergman, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign, A
Model of Antecedents and Outcomes of Racial/Ethnic Harassment in the Workplace
Anita Lancaster, Defense Manpower Data Center, Discussant
10.
Symposium: Friday, 10:30 11:50
Marina 5 (E)
A
Comprehensive Model of Individual Adaptability
The extreme dynamism of a current time is forcing us to
look at how individuals adapt to constant change. This symposium introduces a
comprehensive model of adaptability and its relationship to the adaptation
process and reports research involving and supporting elements of the model.
Robert F. Morrison, Chair
Robert F. Morrison, Douglas T. Hall, Boston University, Individual
Adaptability and Its Antecedents
Douglas T. Hall, Boston University, Adaptation, Moderators of Its
effectiveness, and Its Outcomes
Michael D. Mumford, University of Oklahoma, Validating
Background Data Measures of Adaptability: A Multistudy Construct Validation
Effort
Thomas Diamante, Veridian, Manuel London, SUNY-Stony Brook, External
and Internal Expansiveness: Sources of Resilience in High-Tech Businesses
11.
Symposium: Friday, 10:30 11:50
Marina 6 (E)
Action-State
Orientation: The Concept, its Measurement,
and Implications for the Workplace
Action-state orientation, a stable individual difference
factor that affects self-regulatory processing, offers a new approach to
understanding motivation and performance. In
this symposium we provide an overview of the action-state orientation construct,
discuss implications for the workplace, address measurement of the construct,
and examine effects on work variables.
Debra Steele-Johnson, Wright State University, Co-Chair
Phil Mangos, Personnel Decisions Research Institutes, Co-Chair
Rosalie J. Hall, University of Akron,
Carrie A. Schlauch, University of Akron,
Chu-Hsiang Chang, University of Akron, Implications
of Action-State Orientation and Action Control Theory for the Understanding of
Autonomy Effects on Satisfaction and Performance
James M. Diefendorff, Louisiana State University,
Robin Hughes, Louisiana State University, Allen Kamin, Applied Psychological Techniques, Development
of an Action-State Orientation Measure for the Workplace
Johannes Rank, Hamburg University, Paul E. Spector, University of South
Florida, The Relative Importance of Action-State Orientation in Predicting Role
Innovation and Personal Initiative
Debra Steele-Johnson, Wright State University,
Phil Mangos, Personnel Decisions Research Institutes, Paul Heintz Jr., Wright State University, Effects
of Action-State Orientation on Task Perceptions, Motivation, and Performance
Robert G. Lord, University of Akron, Discussant
12.
Panel Discussion: Friday, 10:30 11:50
Spinnaker (E)
Forget
What You Learned in School: Do It Our Way
How can I-O practitioners overcome the real-world
organizational constraints that make implementing the best practices we learn
seem impossible? Academics and practitioners discuss inconsistencies between the
ideal or textbook way and the organization way, how they arise, and
what to do when managers insist, Do it our way.
Andrea M. Markowitz, University of Baltimore, Chair
Mike G. Aamodt, Radford University, Panelist
Ilene F. Gast, Immigration & Naturalization Service,
Panelist
Richard A. Guzzo, William M. Mercer, Inc., Panelist
Thomas E. Mitchell, University of Baltimore, Panelist
Joyce Silberstang, Fields Consulting Group, Panelist
13.
Poster Session: Friday, 10:30 11:50
Exhibit Hall (E)
Selection
and Recruitment
Halo
Effects in Ratings of Organizational Citizenship Behavior
Nina Keith, University of GiessenGermany
Doris Fay, University of GiessenGermany
To examine occurrence of halo effects in ratings of
Organizational Citizenship Behavior, self- and peer-ratings
were contrasted. Data from 468 Dutch students indicated that self-ratings were
more differentiated than peer-ratings and that the extent of halo in
peer-ratings differed depending on how well the ratee was known by the rater.
Legal
Implications of Personnel Assessment: An Analysis of Court Cases
Scott Finlinson, Ohio University
Peter Y. Chen, Colorado State University
Casey Tischner, Ohio University
John Lyle, Ohio University
Paula M. Popovich, Ohio University
Based on 1,358 court cases (19681998) pertaining to
personnel assessment, we identified 140 cases that involved litigation in the
workplace. Quantitative and
qualitative analyses of court decisions revealed a number of findings that have
important implications in the practice of personnel assessment.
When
Do Response Distortion Scales Reflect Faking? A Meta-Analysis
Jennifer M. Hurd, University of Akron
Relations between response distortion and personality were
meta-analytically examined in presumably honest (i.e., respond honestly,
incumbent) and faking samples (i.e., directed faking, applicants).
The primary studies were constrained to personality dimensions and
samples relevant to personnel selection. Results
indicated response distortion and personality share primarily trait variance in
both settings.
The
Influence of Culture on Situational Judgment Test Responses
Lisa H. Nishii, University of Maryland
Robert E. Ployhart, University of Maryland
Joshua M. Sacco, Michigan State/Aon Consulting
Darin Wiechmann, Michigan State University
Kirk L. Rogg, Aon Consulting
Situational judgment tests (SJTs) are an increasingly used
selection method, but no research has examined whether they are susceptible to
cultural influences. A total of
1,323 participants from 8 countries were involved in this study.
Logistic regression analyses revealed that culture is indeed a predictor
of SJT response choices.
Predictive
and Incremental Validity in a Customer Service Setting
Michael S. Fetzer, University of Southern Mississippi
Vincent J. Fortunato, University of Southern Mississippi
Jeffrey D. Kudisch, University of Southern Mississippi
Carl E. Eidson, Wilson Learning Corporation
This study investigates individual and incremental
predictive validities of four selection instruments using multiple performance
criteria. Using a sample of 152 Customer Service Managers, results indicate that
Agreeableness emerged as the only predictor of all six performance criteria and
outperformed its cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and integrity
counterparts.
The
Criterion-Related Validity of Integrity Test Sub-Facets
Chad H. Van Iddekinge, Clemson University
Mary Anne Taylor, Clemson University
Carl E. Eidson, Wilson Learning Corporation
This study investigated the validity of the sub-factors of
an overt integrity test. A
judgmental sort of test items identified six sub-factors of integrity, two of
which predicted job performance. Results
suggest that integrity is a multifaceted construct, and that some
sub-facets may be stronger predictors of performance
than others.
A
Construct-Oriented Approach to Modeling Entry-level Job Performance
Robert R. Sinclair, Portland State University
Robert P. Michel, American Institutes for Research
We examined the relevance of several performance models
for entry-level workers job performance.
A conceptual analysis of these models suggested eight distinct facets of
entry-level performance. Confirmatory
factor analyses provided moderate support for our hypothesized model.
The
dimensions also displayed different personality correlates, providing additional
validity evidence for the model.
Three
Barriers in External Construct Validation of Assessment Center Ratings
Nanja J. Kolk, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Marise Ph. Born, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Henk Van Der Flier, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Assessment centers correlate low with personality
inventories. Three unintended method factors are hypothesized to decrease this correlation: rating source (other vs. self), domain (global vs.
specific) and format (multi vs. single item). Ratings of measures varying on
these factors were combined in a 2 x 2 x 2 design. Results supported the
influence of each barrier.
A
Multimedia Situational Judgment Test for Social Intelligence
Marise Ph. Born, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Paul E.A.M. Van Der Maesen, Van der Maesen Personnel
Cons.
Karen I. Van Der Zee, University of Groningen
This study describes the development and validation of a
multimedia situational judgment test designed to measure social intelligence.
Results from a sample of 180 employees indicate support for the
underlying interpersonal model of Leary (1957), in which a control and an
affiliation dimension are distinguished.
Combining
Predictor and Criterion Strategies to Reduce Adverse Impact
Neil M. A. Hauenstein, Virginia Tech
Tammy L. Bess, Virginia Tech
Trevor G. Byrd, Virginia Tech
Dana E. Swartz, Virginia Tech
Teresa Ann Wagner, Virginia Tech
This study combined predictor (banding) and
criterion-related (differential weighting) strategies to reduce adverse impact and investigated the possibility of
eliminating adverse impact assuming perfect prediction of the criterion.
Results suggest that significant reduction is feasible using these two
strategies, and that even with perfect prediction, adverse impact can be severe.
Keeping
Score: Empirical Versus Expert Weights on
Situational Judgment Responses
Charles N. MacLane, U.S. Office of Personnel Management
Margaret Barton, U.S. Office of Personnel Management
Anne E. Holloway, Virginia Tech
Bernard J. Nickels, U.S. Office of Personnel Management
Several methodological aspects of situational judgment
tests are in need of further research. This
study compares two common scoring protocols (empirical vs. expert judgment) and
discusses the implications of each with respect to validity, minority/majority
group differences, and incremental validity over cognitive ability tests.
A
Typology of Job Seeker Employment Relationship Preferences
Marcie A. Cavanaugh, Cornell University
Lisa Moynihan, Cornell University
Wendy R. Boswell, Texas A&M University
Mark V. Roehling, Western Michigan University
In a sample of 185 college job seekers, we examine whether
subgroups of job seekers exist that prefer different employment relationships.
The results of a cluster analysis support the existence of four
subgroups congruent with dominant HR strategic types. There were no
differences in applicant quality across subgroup.
Participation
in and Effectiveness of Mock Interviews in Campus Recruitment
Chad Higgins, University of Washington
Sara L. Rynes, University of Iowa
Timothy A. Judge, University of Iowa
This study examines the characteristics of mock interview
participants and the effects of participation on subsequent interview
performance. Results suggest mock interview participants have better academic
credentials, higher social anxiety, and are more likely to have been
foreign-born. Results also suggest mock
interviews did not improve subsequent interview performance.
Diversity
Policy Statements in Job Advertising Affect
Perceptions of Organizations
Kerry R. Moechnig, Minnesota State UniversityMankato
Joan M. Ratz, Minnesota State UniversityMankato
We investigated the effect of five clauses indicating
diversity policies on perceptions of procedural justice, organizational
attractiveness, and the effectiveness of job advertising.
Subjects rated questions and rank-ordered job advertisements for the
gender-neutral position: Laboratory Technician.
Results
indicated significant differences between clauses and between genders for the
organizational variables mentioned.
Matching
Recruitment Messages to Applicant Preferences
Todd J. Thorsteinson, University of Idaho
Michael A. Billings, University of Idaho
Molly C. Joyce, University of Idaho
This study examined whether recruitment messages that
emphasized job attributes that were important to individuals increased their
perceptions of organizational attractiveness compared to individuals who viewed
recruitment messages that did not emphasize those job attributes. Students responded to a fictional employment advertisement
that was either matched or mismatched to their attribute preference.
Results indicated a marginally significant effect on organizational
attractiveness for matching the need in the advertisement to the need preference
of the applicant.
Effects
of Recommendation Forms With Missing Information on
Judgments of Applicants
Todd J. Thorsteinson, University of Idaho
Seth Schreiber, University of Idaho
Nanci Thaemert, University of Idaho
This research examined the effects of missing information
in a recommendation form on judgments of a hypothetical applicant.
Results revealed that the recommendation form with missing information
was perceived as providing the least useful information and the writer was
perceived as the least credible compared to the other conditions.
However, there was no significant difference between the missing
information condition and a complete information condition on judgments of the
applicants suitability for the job.
2001
John Flanagan Award for Best Student Contribution to the
SIOP Conference: Comparison of Three Approaches for Dealing with
Aberrant Angoff Judges
Lisa M. Donahue, George Mason University
Donald M. Truxillo, Portland State University
Lisa Finkelstein, Northern Illinois University
This research compared three techniques for dealing with
aberrant Angoff judgesthe selection, training, and elimination of judges.
Results showed slightly higher levels of generalizability and accuracy for the
elimination technique. The selection technique is discussed as providing the
best overall balance between psychometric adequacy and stakeholder
acceptability.
Toward
An Integrated Model of Applicant Faking Behavior
Lynn A. McFarland, George Mason University
Ann Marie Ryan, Michigan State University
This study tested a model that integrated the Theory of
Planned Behavior with a model presented by
McFarland and Ryan (in press) to predict applicant faking on a personality test.
The model predicted both the intention to fake and faking behavior and
provides evidence that situational factors may alter faking.
Assessment
Center Validity in a Downsizing Organization
Laura A. Gniatczyk, ArvinMeritor, Inc.
Robert T. Ladd, University of Tennessee
Two hypotheses examined the validity of the assessment
center and six alternative predictors in a transitioning organization.
Results confirm the predictive validity of the assessment center, and
also demonstrated the superiority of the assessment center for predicting career
progress in a transitioning organization.
Constrained
Estimation: Finding the Balance Between Competing Goals
John A. Henderson, University of Tennessee
Robert T. Ladd, University of Tennessee
This research explored the use of constrained linear
programming in minimizing errors of estimation while simultaneously minimizing
group mean differences. Results indicated that this type of programming
culminated in the elimination of adverse impact while still preserving nearly
all of the explained variance provided by Ordinary Least Squares regression.
Using
Judgment Analysis to Investigate Assessment Center Ratings
Scott Birkeland, University of South Florida
Walter C. Borman, University of South Florida/PDRI
Michael T. Brannick, University of South Florida
This
investigation evaluates the judgment and decision-making policy of
assessment center (AC) judges using a lens model design.
Results suggest that AC judges do not make optimal use of information
when making overall assessment ratings and mechanical methods of integration
should be employed. Potential
explanations for this suboptimal use of information are discussed.
g
as a Predictor of Performance for Computer Programmers
Denise Potosky, Pennsylvania State University
This study examined the predictive validity of g
and training and job performance for new employees in a software company.
Surprisingly, g was not related to computer training performance
outcomes. Although g was an
excellent predictor of job performance for nontechnical employees, g
failed to predict performance for technical employees.
The
Effects of Range Restriction on Estimates of Criterion Reliability
Roxanne M. Laczo, University of Minnesota
Paul R. Sackett, University of Minnesota
Richard D. Arvey, University of Minnesota
Three mechanisms by which range restriction can affect
criterion reliability estimates and, subsequently, validity estimates were
modeled: truncation on the predictor, truncation on an unobserved variable, and
truncation on the criterion. The three models were found to have substantial
differences in their consequences for reliability and validity estimation.
Influences
and Outcomes of Applicant Impression Management Use in Interviews
Amy L. Kristof-Brown, University of Iowa
Melinda Franke, Royal Neighbors of America
Murray R. Barrick, Michigan State University
Results from 73 applicants demonstrate extraverted
applicants made more extensive use of self-promotion during interviews, while
agreeableness was associated with greater nonverbal cues.
Recruiters
perceptions of applicants personjob fit were most strongly related to
self-promotion; whereas perceptions of applicantrecruiter similarity were
predicted by applicants nonverbal impression management.
How
Well Do Participants Fake on Occupational Personality Questionnaires?
Beth A. Martin, John Carroll University
Chieh-Chen Bowen, Cleveland State University
Steven T. Hunt, SHL
Whether respondents are able to fake equally well on
normative and ipsative type scales was investigated. Results revealed a
significant interaction such that the form (ipsative/normative) moderated the
relationship between instructions (honest/faking) and the amount of agreement
between participants ideal and managerial ratings of ideal personality
profiles.
Preventing
Employee Trade Secret Disclosure: Insights from
Decision-Making Theory
Ty L. Menna, University of Arkansas
Steven W. Kopp, University of Arkansas
The management of trade secrets is a pressing issue facing
todays organizational psychologists and human resource managers.
Unfortunately, little academic attention has been paid to this issue.
In this paper we provide suggestions for the management of trade secrets
based on theory and research from decision-making theory.
Comparing
the Validity of Rationally Derived and Empirically Derived
Scoring Keys for a Situational Judgment Inventory
Cheryl J. Paullin, Personnel Decisions Research
Institutes
Mary Ann Hanson, Independent Consultant
This research compares the validity of rational and
empirical scoring methods for a Situational Judgment Inventory (SJI) developed
to measure enlisted supervisory effectiveness in U.S. Army jobs. The
results suggest that the scoring methods produce equal levels of
validity.
A
Meta-Analysis of Modifications to the Angoff Method and their
Effects on Judges Mean Estimates of Item Difficulty
Gregory M. Hurtz, Regents College
Meredith Auerbach, University at Albany
Meta-analytic theory
and techniques were used to evaluate the systematic effects of procedural
modifications of the Angoff (1971) method on outcomes of the judgment process.
The studys findings indicated the following: (a) a common definition
of a minimally competent test-taker increased agreement among judges on cutoff
scores (i.e., average probability estimates); (b) the provision of normative
data to judges systematically lowered cutoff scores; and (c) group discussion
among judges resulted in increased cutoff scores and reduced interjudge
variability in estimates.
Selecting
Individuals for Teams: The Role of Teamwork and Personality
Matthew H. Reider, Purdue University
Frederick P. Morgeson, Michigan State University
Michael A. Campion, Purdue University
Although work is commonly structured around teams, there
is relatively little empirical research into how to select individuals in
team-based settings. We examine the role teamwork knowledge, skills, and
abilities and the personality characteristics of conscientiousness and
agreeableness play in job performance. Results indicate these attributes
independently and jointly predict job performance.
Impression
Management Tactics in Structured Interviews:
A Function of Question Type?
Aleks Ellis, Michigan State University
Bradley J. West, Michigan State University
Ann Marie Ryan, Michigan State University
Richard P. DeShon, Michigan State University
Examined issues related to the use of impression
management tactics in structured employment interviews. Found differences in the
frequency of use of various tactics, and that question type was related to the
amount and types of tactics used. A positive relationship was found between
impression management and interviewer evaluations.
Recruitment
is Kidsplay: Brochure Diversity and
Organizational Attractiveness and Fairness
Erika Ringseis, University of Calgary
Tina T. Chen, Pennsylvania State University
Successful organizations in this century will effectively
recruit a diverse employee population. Participants
reviewed and rated recruitment brochures manipulated to depict differing levels
of diversity for a fictional company, Kidsplay. Results suggest an organization exhibiting diversity is
considered fair and attractive by prospective employees.
Recruitment strategies and potential moderators are discussed.
GPA
and the Likelihood of Adverse Impact in Screening Decisions
Arlise P. McKinney, Virginia Tech
Ross L. Mecham, Virginia Tech
Nicholas C. DAngelo, Virginia Tech
Kevin D. Carlson, Virginia Tech
Mary L. Connerley, Virginia Tech
This study examines the widely held assumption that
college grade point average (GPA) is strongly associated with initial screening
decisions in organizations college recruiting, potentially causing adverse
impact. Results from 548 actual screening decisions reveal an average
correlation between college GPA and screening decisions of r = 0.07 (SDr
= 0.213).
The
Effects of Forbidden Information in Employee Selection
Phillip N. Goernert, Minnesota State UniversityMankato
Kathryn M. Oien, Minnesota State UniversityMankato
We examined the effects of forbidden information on the
selection process. One of four
applicants (the Target Applicant) provided a mixture of forbidden and
job-relevant information on their application.
Participants instructed to disregard the forbidden information rated the
Target Applicant more favorably and recalled more job-relevant information from
their application.
The
Validity of Tacit Knowledge in a Graduate School Setting
Wayne R. Edwards, University of Tulsa
Deidra J. Schleicher, University of Tulsa
This study provides evidence for the convergent and
predictive validity of tacit knowledge (TK).
TK provided incremental validity beyond cognitive ability in predicting
graduate school performance. Assessing
the generalizability and subtle criterion contamination of TK and examining the
nomological net between TK and
other constructs strengthened the understanding of TK.
Development
and Validation of a Continuous Learning Scale
David Mohr, Bowling Green State University
Michael Zickar, Bowling Green State University
This paper reports an initial attempt to develop a measure
that could be useful in predicting employee ability to learn new skills quickly.
The findings show a positive relation between two dimensions of the
continuous learning scale, motivation for improvement and enjoyment of learning,
and other variables.
Recruiting
from the Recruiters Perspective: The Buffering Effects of Volition
Sean Marsh, George Mason University
Kara Incalcaterra, George Mason University
Andrea B. Zucker, Defense Manpower Data Center
This research examined
the relationships among goal pressures, efficacy, job satisfaction, and
performance for recrui-ters. Using
a sample of 4,343 military recruiters, strong support was found for each of
these relationships. Volun-teering
for recruiter duty was also found to play a buffering role between goal
pressures and individual outcomes.
Perceptions
of Affirmative Action Statements in Job Advertisements
Shannon L. Craig, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Holly Traver, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Statements of affirmative action in job ads revealed
greater fairness perceptions for affirmative action employers
and diversity than for ads which encouraged women and minorities to apply. The
perceived emphasis on gender
and attraction to the organization was influenced by participant gender, the job
sex-type, and the ad phrase.
An
Empirical Test of an Interactional Model of Faking
Sarah B. Lueke, University of Akron
Andrea F. Snell, University of Akron
Alfred James Illingworth, University of Akron
Stephanie M. Paidas, University of Akron
A cluster analysis was performed to investigate the
scenarios under which different groups of individuals will distort their
responses to employment tests, and to refute the assumption that all applicants
approach faking similarly. Three clusters were found with different patterns of
response distortion. Possible
motivating factors were examined.
Exploring
the Criterion Validity of Two Alternate Forms
of a Situational Judgment Test
Carl Swander, Virginia Tech
Two alternate formats
(video and written) of a situational judgment test were compared.
Performance was related to the video format but not the written format.
Unsupported evaluations were explored as an explanation.
Reading comprehension was only related to the written format.
However, the reading by format interaction was not significant.
Design
and Validation of an Assessment Center for Expatriate Selection
Filip Lievens, Ghent UniversityBelgium
Etienne Van Keer, SHL Belgium
This study investigates the predictive validity of an
assessment center designed to select European executives for an intensive
management development program in Japan. The
overall assessment rating correlated between .41 and .53 (corrected) with the
overall training performance of the executives.
The group discussion emerged as the most important predictor.
Content
Validation of an Equipment Driver Work Sample
Steven E. Lammlein, Personnel Decisions Research
Institutess
Robert J. Schneider, Personnel Decisions Research
Institutess
Michael J. Bosshardt, Personnel Decisions Research
Institutess
Toni S. Locklear, Applied Psychological Techniques
This paper describes the development and content
validation of a work sample for selecting drivers for a large manufacturing
company. The methodology
illustrates a targeted job analysis for content validation, emphasizes fidelity
of test and scoring content to the job, and documents multiple validation
linkages to strengthen the inference of validity.
Emotional
Intelligence in the Workplace
Jay Janovics, Central Michigan University
Neil D. Christiansen, Central Michigan University
This study examined the validity of self-report versus
more objective measures of Emotional Intelligence (EI). Results indicated that
the two methods represent distinct factors and that performance-based EI scores
correlated with job performance, cognitive ability, agreeableness, and openness.
Self-report EI scores were related to personality but neither
performance nor cognitive ability.
Faking
Personality Profiles: Job Desirability or Social Desirability?
Steven R. Burnkrant, U.S. Office of Personnel Management
One-hundred-thirty-eight participants completed
personality measures in either a high competition or low compe-tition
condition, and in an honest condition, a journalist condition, and a
certified public accountant condition. Although
competition had no effect, participants did alter their scores using
job-desirable responding on job-relevant dimensions and social desirability on
job-irrelevant dimensions.
Gender
Bias in Mechanical Comprehension Measurement:
A Question of Experience
William Wooten, University of Central Florida
Kristin O. Prien, Assessment Resources Group
The Bennett Mechanical Comprehension Test and the Work
Skills Test were analyzed to determine if differences in item orientation could
be used to predict expected gender bias. Data
from 219 participants suggests that part of
the traditional gender bias found in such measures is an artifact of
differential experiences.
Personal
Characteristics Measures to Predict Safety-Related Work Behaviors
D. Apryl Rogers, Jeanneret & Associates, Inc.
Mark H. Strong, Jeanneret & Associates, Inc.
Michelle Zbylut, University of Houston
This study examined a customized measure of personal
characteristics, experiences, and preferences for use in hiring production and
maintenance workers. The customized
measure was found to be more effective than the NEO-FFI in terms of correlating
with ratings of safety-related performance, as well as correlating with actual
accident involvement.
Hiring Recommendations as a Function of Evaluators
Social Dominance Orientation
Christy Lynn McLendon, Tulane University
Janet B. Ruscher, Tulane University
This study examined the effects of raters social
dominance orientation (SDO) and applicant competence on evaluations and hiring
recommendations for female applicants. As
hypothesized, competence predicted female raters evaluations and hiring
recommendations, whereas SDO did not. For
male raters, SDO and competence predicted evaluations, but only SDO
predicted hiring recommendations.
Key
Antecedents to the Bridge Employment Decision among Early Retirees
Mark A. Davis, University of North Texas
This research
investigates the decision to accept bridge employment in the context of early
retirement. Using a sample of 137
early retirees from the oil and gas services industry, the study looks at
several potential predictors of the bridge employment decision including
certainty about retirement plans, work involvement, and push versus pull
factors.
Understanding
Job Mobility Intentions:
A Test of the Extended Investment Model
Karen Van Dam, Tilburg UniversityThe Netherlands
This study focused upon the exchange relationship between
the organization and the employee, and its effect on employees mobility
intentions, by extending and improving Farrell & Rusbults (1981; Rusbult
& Farrell, 1983) investment model. Data from 953 employees in three
hospitals provided support for the extended investment model.
14.
Symposium: Friday, 10:30 11:50
Bel Aire Ballroom North
(W)
Leadership
and Team Adaptation: Examining the Attributes and Training Strategies that
Promote Effective Performance in Dynamic Environments
Despite the emergence of adaptability as a critical
performance requirement for most organizational leaders and teams, there is
little or no research on the variables and processes that facilitate adaptive
performance. This symposium
presents research findings on leader attributes, team processes, and training
interventions that influence team adaptability.
Stephen J. Zaccaro, Chair
Sean Marsh, George Mason University,
K. Lee Kiechel, George Mason University,
Lisa A. Boyce, U.S. Army Research Institutes/ George Mason University,
Stephen J. Zaccaro, Leader
Emergence and Functional Leadership: The Role of Leader Traits and Information
Provision in Adaptive Situations
Deanna Banks, George Mason University,
Paige Bader, George Mason University,
Patrick Fleming, George Mason University, Stephen J. Zaccaro, Herbert F. Barber, U.S. Army War College, Leader Adaptability: The Role of
Work Experiences and Individual Differences
Frederick J. Panzer, Florida International University,
Michelle A. Marks, Florida International University, Leslie A. DeChurch, Florida International University,
Kevin Brown, Florida International University,
Annie Nguyen, Florida International University, Monitoring Training: An
Examination of the Effects of Training Monitoring Skills on Team Performance
Janis A. Cannon-Bowers, Naval Air Warfare Center, Discussant