81. Panel Discussion: Saturday, 8:00 9:50
Grande Ballroom A (E)
A Critical Examination of Zero-Tolerance Policies in the
Workplace
In the wake of costly sexual harassment scandals and
recent Supreme Court decisions, the concept of zero tolerance has been widely
advocated. Yet, little is known
about its effectiveness or liabilities. This
interdisciplinary panel takes a critical view of zero tolerance and explores
other strategies for effectively ending and preventing workplace sexual
harassment and discrimination.
Margaret S. Stockdale, Southern Illinois
UniversityCarbondale, Chair
Susan Bisom-Rapp, Thomas Jefferson School of Law, Panelist
Jane Goodman-Delahunty, U.S. Equal Opportunity
Commission, Panelist
Barbara A. Gutek, University of Arizona, Panelist
Freada Klein, Klein and Associates, Panelist
Maureen OConnor, John Jay College of Criminal
Justice, Panelist
82. Symposium: Saturday, 8:00 9:50
Grande Ballroom B (E)
Leaders of Diverse Work Groups: Understanding the Challenges
and Exploring Strategies for Success
Current research findings will be presented that highlight
four major challenges facing leaders of diverse work groups: managing
perceptions of diversity initiatives, managing cultural differences in work
groups, developing
multicultural competence, and understanding leadership in different cultures.
Data-driven recommendations for overcoming such challenges will be
discussed.
Donna Chrobot-Mason, University of ColoradoDenver, Chair
Lori Anderson, Colorado State University,
George C. Thornton, Colorado State University, Jeanette N. Cleveland, Pennsylvania State University, Support
for Affirmative Action Initiatives among Diverse Groups: The Role of Ethnic
Identity
Eugene F. Stone-Romero, University of Central Florida,
Dianna L. Stone, University of Central Florida, Eduardo Salas, University of Central Florida,
Mark Hartman, University of Central Florida, Elizabeth J. Muniz, University of Central Florida, Differences
in the Work-Related Values and Behaviors of Hispanic-Americans and
Anglo-Americans
Donna Chrobot-Mason, University of ColoradoDenver, Developing
Multicultural Competence to Improve Cross-Race Work Relationships
Melenie J. Lankau, University of Georgia,
Beth G. Chung, San Diego State University, A
Comparison of American and International Prototypes of Successful Managers
Robert L. Dipboye, Rice University, Discussant
Bernardo M. Ferdman, California School of Professional
Psychology, Discussant
83. Symposium: Saturday, 8:00 9:50
Harbor Island I (E)
Expanding Turnover Research: Exploring Individual, Group,
and Organizational Linkages
The record high employment level and booming economy are
putting increased pressure on organizations to retain their employees.
New lines of research on turnover and retention are presented from
several vantage points: individual, group, and organizational levels.
While bridging across these levels, issues relevant to both theory and
practice are represented.
James D. Westaby, Columbia University Teachers College, Co-Chair
Wendy L. Richman-Hirsch, William M. Mercer, Inc., Co-Chair
Thomas W. Lee, University of Washington,
Terence R. Mitchell, University of Washington, Why
People Stay: More on Job Embeddedness
Alain R. Salamin, University of Lausanne,
Peter W. Hom, Arizona State University, Cross-Cultural Test of the Curvilinear Performance-Turnover
Relationship: The Case of Swiss Bank Personnel
James D. Westaby, Columbia University Teachers College,
John M. Perez, Columbia University, Using
Accessible Reason Constructs to Gain New Insight into Turnover Processes
Naomi G. Dyer, University of Maryland,
William P. Sipe, University of Maryland,
Luis F. Parra, William M. Mercer, Inc., Richard A. Guzzo, William M. Mercer, Inc., Dynamics
of Diversity: Consequences of the Changing Composition of Workgroups on Turnover
Douglas W. Dwyer, William M. Mercer, Inc.,
Wendy L. Richman-Hirsch, William M. Mercer, Inc., Stefan Gaertner, William M. Mercer, Inc., Making
the Business Case: The Impact of Turnover and Intent to Quit on
Business Performance
Joseph G. Ross, University of Colorado, Discussant
84. Symposium: Saturday, 8:00 9:20
Harbor Island II (E)
Integrating Image and Fit in Applicant Attraction Research
The likelihood that an individual will apply to an
organization is related to the overall image that the potential applicant holds
of the company and the compatibility between the individual and organization
(P-O fit). This symposium contributes to applicant attraction research by
integrating P-O fit and various conceptualizations of image.
Jerel Slaughter, Louisiana State University, Chair
Cynthia Kay Stevens, University of Maryland,
Lisa Dragoni, University of Maryland,
Christopher Collins, Cornell University, Familiarity, Organizational
Images, and Perceived Fit as Antecedents to the Application Decisions of New
Graduates
Jerel Slaughter, Louisiana State University,
Michael Zickar, Bowling Green State University, Scott Highhouse, Bowling Green State University,
David Mohr, Bowling Green State University,
Derek A. Steinbrenner, Cambria Consulting, Jimmie K. OConnor, Bowling Green State
University, Personality Trait Inferences About Organizations: Development of a
Measure and Tests of the Congruence Hypothesis
Christine Scheu, Michigan State University,
Ann Marie Ryan, Michigan State University, Achieving
Recruitment Goals: Applying What We Know About Person-Organization Fit Across a
Range of Recruitment Image
Annelies Van Vianen, University of Amsterdam,
Agneta H. Fischer, University of Amsterdam, Person-Culture
Fit: Attractiveness of Top Management Positions for Women
Daniel M. Cable, University of North Carolina, Discussant
Michele E. A. Jayne, Ford Motor Company, Discussant
85. Practitioner Forum: Saturday, 8:00 9:20
Harbor Island III (E)
Is There a Role for Strategic Evaluation in I-O
Interventions?
Strategic evaluation assesses the effectiveness and
utility of organizational programs against business strategy and desired
outcomes. This practitioner forum is designed to share the nature and value of
strategic evaluation with I-O practitioners, arguing that evaluation of this
type is beneficial and essential
to I-O psychology. Discussant Michael Campion will respond in what we
expect to be an enlightening exchange of ideas.
Jennifer W. Martineau, Center for Creative Leadership, Chair
Dale S. Rose, 3D Group, If We Dont Evaluate Our Work,
Who Will?
Jennifer W. Martineau,
Center for Creative Leadership, Value
Added: Evaluations Contribution to I-O Interventions
Jeanne Carsten, Chase Manhattan Bank, Realizing
the Benefits of Strategic Evaluation in the New Economy
Steven D. Jones, Middle Tennessee State University, Translating
Business Strategy into Performance Measures: A Tool or an Evaluation?
Michael A. Campion, Purdue University, Discussant
86. Symposium: Saturday, 8:00 9:50
Marina 2 (E)
Modern Analytic Techniques in the Study of 360-Degree
Performance Ratings
Sophisticated methods are increasingly being used to
evaluate the psychometric properties of 360-degree performance ratings. This symposium will
demonstrate the use of IRT, CFA, and RWG to elucidate rater and source effects;
IRT sampling requirements; and how Differential Item Functioning may be expected
due to contextual complexity.
Robert B. Kaiser, Kaplan DeVries Inc., Co-Chair
S. Bartholomew Craig, Kaplan DeVries Inc., Co-Chair
James M. LeBreton, University of TennesseeKnoxville,
Jennifer R. D. Burgess, University of TennesseeKnoxville, E. Kate Atchley, University of
TennesseeKnoxville, Robert
B. Kaiser, Kaplan DeVries Inc.,
Lawrence R. James, University of TennesseeKnoxville, True
or False?: Different Sources of Performance Ratings Dont Agree
Rachel S. Tears, Auburn University,
Ryan Shaemus OLeary, Auburn University, Jeffrey D. Facteau, Auburn University, Do Rating Sources Matter?
A Replication of Mount, Judge, Scullen, Sytsma, and Hezlett (1998)
Michael A. Barr, Illinois Institute of Technology,
Nambury S. Raju, Illinois Institute of Technology, IRT-Based
Assessments of Rater Effects in Multiple Source Feedback Instruments
S. Bartholomew Craig, Kaplan DeVries Inc.,
Robert B. Kaiser, Kaplan DeVries Inc., Violating
the Independent Observations Assumption in IRT-Based Analyses of 360-Degree
Instruments: Can We Get Away With It?
Jim Penny, Center for Creative Leadership, DIF
as a Natural Consequence: Maybe Some Clouds Do Have a
Silver Lining
Francis J. Yammarino, SUNYBinghamton, Discussant
87. Symposium: Saturday, 8:00 9:50
Marina 5 (E)
Person Perception in Organizations: The Heart and Mind of I-O
Psychology
Person perception is the heart of many I-O
psychology-based organizational processes. Presenters offer a model of person perception and then explore
issues of social cognition and interpersonal judgment in employment interviews,
assessment centers, promotion decisions, and executive coaching. Methods for
enhancing interpersonal judgment in organizations are discussed.
Manuel London, SUNYStony Brook, Chair
Richard J. Klimoski, George Mason University,
Lisa M. Donahue, George Mason University, Person
Perception in Organizations: Basic Theory and Research
Charles K. Parsons, Georgia Tech, Robert C. Liden, University of
IllinoisChicago, Talya
N. Bauer, Portland State University, Person
Perception in Employment Interviews
Valerie Sessa, Center for Creative Leadership, Perceptual
Processes in Promotion Decisions
Paul R. Sackett, University of Minnesota,
Kathleen Tuzinski, University of Minnesota, The
Role of Dimensions and Exercises in Assessment Centers
James W. Smither, LaSalle University,
Susanne P. Reilly, Right-Manus Consulting, Person
Perception in
Executive Coaching Relationships
Milton D. Hakel, Bowling Green State University, Discussant
88. Symposium: Saturday, 8:00 9:50
Marina 6 (E)
Understanding EmployeeOrganization Relationships:
Exchange Processes, Violation, and Psychological Contracts
The past decade has seen a growing interest in
understanding the changing employment relationship. This symposium presents new research addressing the
measurement of exchange processes, factors underlying the development of
employeeorganization exchanges, the effects of exchanges, and the impact of
failure of organizations and employees to fulfill their obligations.
Lois E. Tetrick, University of Houston, Co-Chair
Lynn M. Shore, Georgia State University, Co-Chair
Lynn M. Shore, Georgia State University,
Lois E. Tetrick, University of Houston,
Sandy J. Wayne, University of Illinois at Chicago,
William H. Bommer, Georgia State University, The
Role of Social and Economic
Exchanges Between Employees and Organizations
Neta Moye, University of Maryland, Kathryn M. Bartol, University of
Maryland, Re-Framing the Psychological Contract: Social Exchange-Based Dimensions
and Their Relationship to Identification and Performance
Lois E. Tetrick, University of Houston,
Lynn M. Shore, Georgia State University,
William H. Bommer, Georgia State University, Sandy J. Wayne, University of
IllinoisChicago, Effects of Perceptions of Employers Failure to Keep their Promises:
An Application of ELVN-P
Kyle Lewis, University of TexasAustin,
M. Susan Taylor, University of Maryland, Reciprocity
from the Organizations Side: How Manager-Agents React to Employee
Psychological Contract Breach
Denise M. Rousseau, Carnegie Mellon University, Discussant
89. Symposium: Saturday, 8:00 9:50
Spinnaker (E)
Soft Factors in a Soft Area: Emotions in Service Encounters
We assume that service encounters are mainly driven by
emotions and therefore will ask: Which emotions matter in different service
environments? How emotions are
exchanged in service-providerclient-interactions? How can we explain the
(un-)pleasantness of the power dimension? What is the relationship between
managers personalities and service atmosphere?
Avraham N. Kluger, Hebrew UniversityJerusalem, Chair
Michael Frese, University of GiessenGermany, Chair
Avraham N. Kluger, Hebrew UniversityJerusalem,
Anat Rafaeli, TechnionIsrael Institute of Technology, Can
Happiness Be Bad for Business?
Angelo Giardini, University of GiessenGermany,
Michael Frese, University of GiessenGermany, Affective
Complementarity in Service Interactions
Varda Wasserman, Hebrew UniversityJerusalem,
Avraham N. Kluger, Hebrew UniversityJerusalem, Power-Related
Emotions Expressed Towards Aesthetics of Service Organizations
Seth Hayes, University of Maryland,
Mina Huang, University of Maryland,
Amy N. Salvaggio, University of Maryland, Benjamin Schneider, University of Maryland, Manager
Personality and Climate for Service
David E. Bowen, Thunderbird, Discussant
90. Panel Discussion: Saturday, 8:00 9:50
Bel Aire Ballroom North
(W)
I-O Psychologists in Organizations: Making a Difference,
Gaining Respect
Is it true that I-O psychologists dont get no
respect? This panel will examine ways in which I-O psychologists can gain
influence and respect as practitioners in a variety of organizations, private
and public, without losing their I-O identity.
Implications for education and training will be included.
Lynn R. Offermann, George Washington University, Chair
Marilyn K. Gowing, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Panelist
Laurie A. Broedling, LB Organizational Consulting, Panelist
Jeffrey J. McHenry, Microsoft Corporation, Panelist
Mirian M. Graddick-Weir, AT&T, Panelist
Irwin L. Goldstein, University of Maryland, Panelist
91. Symposium: Saturday, 8:30 9:50
Grande Ballroom C (E)
Stress, Integrated Health and Well-Being in a Global Work
Context
This symposium extends psychologys concern for stress,
health, and well-being. Four
presentations consider new research on the happy/productive worker, a Mind-Body
Disequilibrium (MBD) homeopathic model of integrated health, the benefits of
organizational commitment on worker health, and offers guidelines for stress and
coping in a global work context.
James Campbell Quick, University of Texas at
Arlington/U.S. Air Force Reserve, Co-Chair
Joanne H. Gavin, University of Texas at Arlington,
Thomas A. Wright, University of NevadaReno,
Laurie G. Larwood, University of NevadaReno, A
Further Look at the Happy/Productive Worker Thesis
W. John Diamond, Triad Medical Center, The
Contribution of the Workplace to Mind/Body Dysfunction
Russell S. Cropanzano, Colorado State University,
J. Ragan Ward, Colorado State University, Patricia A. Aloise-Young, Colorado State University, Organizational
Commitment, Worker Health, and Life Satisfaction: An Identity Theory Approach
Rabi S. Bhagat,
University of Memphis, Stress
and Health in Organizational Contexts: An International Perspective
92. Panel Discussion: Saturday, 8:30 9:50
Seabreeze (E)
Going Postal: The Truth About Violence in the Postal
Service
A comprehensive,
independent study of violence in the U.S. Postal Service and USPSs efforts to
prevent violence and improve the work environment are presented. The discussion
addresses the most extensive examination of workplace violence ever conducted,
as well as an innovative dispute resolution process in
the United States second largest
employer.
Richard D. Arvey, University of Minnesota, Chair
Naomi Goldstein, U.S. Postal Service, Panelist
Laree Martin, U.S. Postal Service, Panelist
Suzanne Milton, U.S. Postal Service, Panelist
Ann M. Quigley, U.S. Postal Service, Panelist
93. Poster Session: Saturday, 8:30 9:50
Exhibit Hall (E)
Teams, Leadership, and Conflict
The Conflict Dynamics Profile: A Multirater Behavioral
Measure Of Conflict
Mark H. Davis, Eckerd College
Sal Capobianco, Eckerd College
Linda A. Kraus, Certified Mediator
This paper describes a new multi-rater instrument for
measuring conflict behaviorthe Conflict Dynamics Profile (CDP).
Unlike existing style-based measures, the CDP focuses on 15 specific,
concrete behavioral responses to conflict.
Evidence is presented which supports both the reliability and validity of
the instrument.
The Influence of the Temporal Nature of Relationship
Development on LMX, OCBs, and Performance
Michael Hepperlen, University of NebraskaOmaha
Roni Reiter-Palmon, University of NebraskaOmaha
Despite recent growing interest in leader-member exchange
(LMX) theory, few researchers have examined the underlying processes involved in
LMX development. The present field study examined the temporal nature of relationship development and its
interrelationship with LMX, OCBs, leader-member similarity,
and both subjective and objective performance assessment.
Best of Both Worlds: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches
to Assessing Breach and Retaliation
Sandra Rever-Moriyama, SMED International/University of
Calgary
Jean Wallace, University of Calgary
This paper discusses the advantages to using the
retrospective report method and combining quantitative and qualitative
approaches to assessing psychological contract breach and retaliatory behaviors.
The results suggest that participant responses differ significantly
depending on which method is used. The
methodological implications of these results are discussed.
Should I Stay or Should I Go? Predicting Team Viability
Mahmut Bayazit, Cornell University
Elizabeth A. M. Mannix, Cornell University
Teams with low relationship conflict, high efficacy, and
high performance are found to have high team
viability. The interaction hypothesis that team members may be willing to
tolerate relationship conflict if they perceive high team efficacy is not
supported. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
The Influence of Impression Management on Organizational
Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis
Nhung T. Nguyen, Virginia Commonwealth University
Michael A. McDaniel, Work Skills First, Inc.
A meta-analytic investigation on 69 correlation
coefficients across 8,650 people revealed a
moderate positive effect for impression management across organizational
outcomes: performance rating, promotability, supervisor liking, peer liking,
interview rating, and Leader-Member-Exchange quality. However, the effect was
moderated by specific impression management tactics used as well as specific
organizational outcome.
Airline Employee Satisfaction and Airport Station Performance
Delbert M. Nebeker, Alliant University
Hamady D. Diallo, Alliant University
Agnieszka M. Czekajewski, Alliant University
Philipp D. Werenfels, Alliant University
Bernardo M. Ferdman, Alliant University
Licia Busso, Alliant University
Satisfaction data from
12,842 airline employees at 60 airport stations was used to explore the
relationship between station satisfaction levels and airport station
performance. Results indicate that
employee satisfaction is related to performance and that traffic volume and
employee affective commitment interacts in determining customer satisfaction.
Assessing General Attitudes about Workgroups:
Scale Development and Validation
Rebecca A. Henry, Purdue University
Tatana Olson, Purdue University
This research summarizes the development of a measure of
general attitudes about working in groups.
Three dimensions are theorized, each reflecting a distinct potential
benefit of working collaboratively (intrinsic, task, and social benefits).
Results from two studies support this conceptualization and provide good
evidence of the scales construct validity.
A Meta-Analytic Investigation of the Relationship Between
Individual Differences and Leader Effectiveness
Robyn Maldegen Youngjohn, Texas A&M University
David J. Woehr, University of TennesseeKnoxville
This meta-analysis investigated the relationship between
individual differences and leader effectiveness. It found individual characteristics differentially predicted
leader effectiveness with correlations ranging from .1271.
The variables most highly correlated with leader effectiveness were
charisma, management skills, decision making, and dominance.
Leader level and the type of criterion measure used were found to
moderate the relationship between individual characteristics and leader
effectiveness.
Applying Social Cognitive Theory to Leadership: A New
Paradigm
Michael J. McCormick, University of HoustonClear Lake
David J. Woehr, University of TennesseeKnoxville
The relationship between leader self-confidence and
leadership success has long been noted. Yet,
absent from the literature is a theoretical explanation.
A new leadership paradigm is proposed based on Banduras (1986) social
cognitive theory that can explain this relationship.
Implications for leadership research are discussed.
Need for Cognition as an Intrinsic Motivator in Collective
Performance
Brian N. Smith, Virginia Commonwealth University
Michael J. Markus, Virginia Commonwealth University
Natalie A. Kerr, Virginia Commonwealth University
Mark F. Stasson, Virginia Commonwealth University
The present study examined whether need for cognition
moderates social loafing effects. As predicted, high need for cognition
individuals did not engage in social loafing on a cognitively engaging task.
Low need for cognition individuals, on the other hand, performed
significantly better in the coactive than in the collective condition.
The Interactive Effects of Pro-Political Behavior and
Politics Perceptions
Wayne Hochwarter, University of Alabama
It was hypothesized that political behavior and perceived
politics would interact such that those who reported greater use of these
tactics would be more satisfied and committed when work environments were viewed
as political in nature. Data
gathered from 131 police officers provided strong support for this hypothesis.
Predicting Supervisor Support for Empowered Work Teams
Madeline Wu, University of Western Australia
John Cordery, University of Western Australia
David Morrison, University of Western Australia
The relative efficacy of the theories of reasoned action
and planned behavior (two versions) were assessed
in explaining and predicting supervisor intentions in facilitating employee
empowerment. Data from 502 supervisors
indicated that the second version of the theory of planned behavior provided the
best fit to the data.
Effects of Cognitive Ability, Self-Monitoring,
and Emotional Intelligence on Performance
Sophia Cho, Pennsylvania State University
Previous research has demonstrated that cognitive ability
and personality differentially predict task and contextual performance.
The current study examined self-monitoring and emotional intelligence as
predictors of contextual performance. Results
indicated that cognitive ability predicted task performance and emotional
intelligence predicted contextual performance; self-monitoring did not predict
contextual performance.
Disentangling Sources of Egocentric Bias in Negotiation
Robert D. Yonker, University of MissouriSt. Louis
Paul W. Paese, University of MissouriSt. Louis
This research disentangled the sources of the egocentric
bias in negotiation by improving upon the methodology of previous experiments.
Results indicated that, while judgments of a fair settlement point were
the most egocentric under conditions that allowed for selective encoding, these
conditions were not necessary for the bias to occur.
Restrictiveness and Effectiveness of Downward Influence
Tactics
Dimitri Liakhovitski, Mercer Delta
Consulting/International Survey Research
Scott J. Behson, Fairleigh Dickinson University
Two studies empirically tested a theoretical model of
downward influence tactics (ITs) effectiveness. The model states that ITs differ in the degree of their
restrictiveness. Perceived ITs
restrictiveness is expected to influence subordinates reactions (commitment,
mere compliance, or resistance) to their superiors influence attempts.
Overall, the data supported the model.
Pygmalion Effects Among Outreach Supervisors and Tutors:
Extending Gender and Ethnic Generalizability
Gloria Natanovich, Tel Aviv University
Dov Eden, Tel Aviv University
Randomly assigned supervisors were told that their
subordinates were ideally qualified; control supervisors were told nothing.
The experimental supervisors provided better leadership and experimental
subordinates increased their self-efficacy.
Better performance among experimental subordinates confirmed the
Pygmalion hypothesis. These effects
were replicated in all four supervisor-subordinate gender combinations and among
Arab women.
An Experimental Study of Affect and Gender in Leader-Member
Exchange
Neal M. Ashkanasy, University of Queensland
Michael Newcombe, University of Queensland
Five hundred thirty-seven participants viewed videotapes
of leaders giving positive and negative feedback with congruent and incongruent
emotional expressions. Results
supported hypotheses that positive and message-congruent affect leads to higher
ratings of leader-member exchange quality.
When giving negative feedback
accompanied by negative affect, female leaders were rated lower than males.
The Acceptance of Femininity: Sex, Gender, Identification and
Leadership
Ronit Kark, University of Michigan
Boas Shamir, Hebrew University
Using carefully matched samples of bank managers,
differences between men and women managers in leadership styles, perceived
femininity and masculinity, and subordinates identification with
the manager were studied. Findings, showing that perceived femininity was
related to transformational leadership and subordinates identification, are
discussed as supporting the current thesis about the feminization of
management.
A Reexamination of Interrelationships Among
French and Ravens (1959) Power Bases
William C. Roedder, University of TennesseeKnoxville
James M. LeBreton, University of TennesseeKnoxville
Michael C. Rush, University of TennesseeKnoxville
French and Ravens (1959) taxonomy of reward, coercive,
legitimate, expert, and reverent power represents one of the most popular
frameworks of power. The current study examines the relationships of these five
power bases with one another. Results are discussed regarding alterations made
to the original French and Raven (1959) concepts.
Towards a New Model of Perceptions of Intergroup Resource
Allocation During Organizational Change
Malgorzata Tluchowska, University of Queensland
Victor J. Callan, University of Queensland
Cynthia Gallois, University of Queensland
The project examines the role group processes play in
predicting judgments of intergroup resource allocation during organizational
change. A model integrating two
frameworks (the social identity theory and the behavioral interaction model) was
tested. Results revealed evidence
for the greater relative importance of intergroup versus intra-group processes
in explaining in-group bias.
Entrepreneurship and Leadership: Common Trends and Common
Threads
Robert P. Vecchio, University of Notre Dame
The continued treatment of entrepreneurship as a separate
area of study that is distinct from other broader domains (e.g., leadership and
interpersonal influence) is questioned. Reviews
of related research on personality, demographics, fit, and cognitive
framing/bias reveal mixed findings and a lack of sufficient evidence to warrant
a distinctly different view of entrepreneurship.
Instead, a recognition of common trends and common threads of thought is encouraged. Finally, a model is proposed that integrates
both process issues and level issues in explaining differential effectiveness in
launching, managing, and exiting a new firm.
Effectiveness of Combining Classroom and Distance Learning
Modes for Executives
Jillian A. Peat, University of TennesseeKnoxville
Peter J. Dean, University of TennesseeKnoxville
Michael J. Stahl, University of TennesseeKnoxville
Dave L. Sylwester, University of TennesseeKnoxville
Research on executive education has generally focused on
comparing distance learning with traditional techniques.
Instead, this study examined the difference between using only
traditional classroom methods and using a combination of traditional and
distance techniques. The results indicated that it is beneficial to use multiple
modes of delivery in executive education.
Antecedents of Job-Related Behavior Within Path-Goal Theory
Michael A. Gillespie, University of South Florida
The effects of leadership style, task structure, and
subordinate LOC on job satisfaction and motivation to perform were examined.
Main effects were found for both job satisfaction and motivation to
perform for leadership style and LOC but not for task structure.
Convincingly significant interactions
were not obtained.
Techniques for Reducing Errors: Redundancy and Division of
Labor
Ira T. Kaplan, Hofstra University
William Metlay, Hofstra University
Deborah A. Shurberg, Hofstra University
Organizations commonly
employ redundant observers to reduce errors.
However, the present experiment found that dividing a monitoring task
among three observers, with no redundancy, yielded a higher detection
probability than assigning the task to three redundant observers.
Visual search and redundancy models were used to explain the results.
Comparing Outcomes to Hybrid Forms of Dispute Resolution
Procedures
Donald Conlon, Michigan State University
Henry Moon, Michigan State University
K. Yee Ng, Michigan State University
This study compared two hybrid dispute resolution
procedures: mediation-arbitration and arbitration-mediation.
Our results demonstrate that more mediated settlements occurred under
arbitration-mediation, but the time taken to settle the dispute was shorter for
mediation-arbitration. Also, disputants rated process control more favorably for
mediation-arbitration, but rated informational justice more favorably for
arbitration-mediation.
Using Biodata to Assess Adaptability Related Constructs in
Leaders
Andrea S. Vincent, University of Oklahoma
Mary Shane Connelly, University of Oklahoma
Brian Decker, University of Oklahoma
Michael D. Mumford, University of Oklahoma
Jorge L. Mendoza, University of Oklahoma
Adaptability-related
constructs are assessed using rationally scaled biodata in a sample of 1,818
U.S. Army officers. A conceptual
structure of adaptability was tested in examining the reliability and validity
of these measures. Results suggest
that general adaptive capacity and emotional regulation are two adaptability
factors contributing to leader performance.
Empowerment at Work: The Role of Transformational
Leadership and Relationships to Work Outcomes
Kimberly Bishop Brossoit, Development Dimensions
International
Using theoretical frameworks proposed by Thomas and
Velthouse (1990) and Bass (1985), data collected from a Fortune 100
organization suggest that transformational leaders positively influence employee
cognitions of empowerment, which in turn translate into increased levels of
employee work satisfaction and to a lesser degree increased levels of employee
work effectiveness.
The Effects of Interdependence Efficacy on Group Goals and
Performance
Shannon Sowers, California State UniversitySan
Bernardino
Janelle Gilbert, California State UniversitySan
Bernardino
This research examined the effects of collective
interdependence efficacy on the difficulty of self-chosen
group goals and performance levels. Data from 108 participants indicated that
teamwork interdependence KSAs were important in the development of collective
efficacy perceptions. Collective efficacy
was found to be related to goal level and performance levels.
The Role of Transformational Leadership in Salespeoples
Motivation
Thomas Rogers, Illinois Institute of Technology
Roya Ayman, Illinois Institute of Technology
One hundred automotive
salespeople and their supervisors participated in this study.
Results showed that transformational leadership (TFL) was not related to
subordinates effort when effort was assessed by their managers.
Although TFL was related to extra effort, its relationship with
self-rated effort was moderated by subordinates job involvement.
Cooperation and Negotiation Outcomes in Virtual Negotiations
:
A Meta-Analysis
Alice F. Stuhlmacher, DePaul University
Maryalice Citera, SUNYNew Paltz
In negotiation, communication media are assumed to
influence both process and outcomes. This
paper meta-analytically reviewed studies that compared face-to-face with virtual
negotiation (e.g., audio, e-mail). Face-to-face negotiations were more cooperative and resulted
in higher outcomes than virtual negotiations. Moderators of the media effect on
cooperation and outcome were found.
Verbal Communication and Performance in a Dyadic Training
Protocol
Travis C. Tubr,
University of Southern Mississippi
Winfred E. Arthur, Texas A&M University
Theresa L. McNelly, Texas A&M University
The extent to which verbal communication between trainees
was related to performance in a dyadic training protocol was examined.
Results indicated a significant, negative relationship between ones
performance and communication on the part of ones partner, such that poor
performance resulted in increased partner-communication rather than resulting
from increased communication.
Comparative Validity of Different Statistical
Operationalizations
of Team Ability as a Function of Task Type
Bryan Edwards, Texas A&M University
Eric Anthony Day, Ohio State University
Bruce A. Miyashiro, Texas A&M University
Winfred E. Arthur, Texas A&M University
Travis C. Tubr,
University of Southern Mississippi
Amber Hanson Tubr,
Texas A&M University
We examined the comparative validity of different
statistical operationalizations (mean, standard deviation,
minimum, and maximum) of team ability in 157 four-person teams in predicting
performance across four team-level criterion tasks. The mean operationalization produced the strongest
correlation with performance on all four tasks.
Organizational Mentoring: What about Protg Needs?
Janine E. U. Knackstedt, University of Waterloo
Whereas research in
organizations has solely measured mentoring occurrences, this study on 387
health care professionals has demonstrated the importance of examining mentoring
needs from the protgs perspective. Exploratory analyses using a dyadic approach reveal that the
strongest needs are expressed by female protgs who have a male mentor.
Autonomous Teamwork and Psychological Well-Being
Christel G. Rutte, Eindhoven University of Technology
Heleen Van Mierlo, Eindhoven University of Technology
Few studies investigated the assumed positive effects of
autonomous groups on individual psychological well-being. The present
questionnaire study investigated (and supported) the hypotheses that (a) group
autonomy is positively related to psychological well-being; (b) this
relationship is mediated by individual autonomy, individual task variety,
individual workload, and social support.
Collectivism and Team Effectiveness: Mediators and Boundary
Conditions
Jason A. Colquitt, University of Florida
Raymond A. Noe, Ohio State University
Christine L. Jackson, University of Florida
This study examined the relationship between collectivism
and team effectiveness (absenteeism, productivity, quality) in a sample of
automotive parts manufacturing teams. The results showed that collectivism was
significantly related to team absenteeism and productivity, effects that were
mediated by instrumentality and conflict. Team autonomy and task interdependence
moderated these effects.
Attitudinal Diversity and Team Outcomes:
Do Interdependence and Size Moderate?
Brian R. Dineen, Ohio State University
Raymond A. Noe, Ohio State University
Carolyn Wiethoff, Ohio State University
The impact of team
attitudinal diversity was examined using 1,313 manufacturing employees in 116
teams. Task interdependence and
team size were also examined as potential moderators. Results revealed interactions of task interdependence and two
measures of diversity on cohesion, as well as size and one measure of diversity
on performance.
An Examination of the Leader Mood State and Team Performance
Relationship
Jason Smith, Pennsylvania State University
John E. Mathieu, University of Connecticut
The influence of leader positive and negative mood states
on multiteam process and performance was
examined within the context of a multiteam low fidelity flight simulation.
Positive leader mood was significantly related to both multiteam action
process and performance. Action
processes mediated the relationship between positive mood and performance.
Creating Cohesive Teams: Analyzing the Effects of Teamwork
Skills Training
Kari R. Strobel, Old Dominion University
Robert M. McIntyre, Old Dominion University
The primary objective of this study was an attempt to
train team members on fundamental teamwork concepts so as to develop measurable
improvements in team cohesion. Results
indicated that compared to the control group, the experimental group
demonstrated greater cohesiveness immediately following training and at
one-month follow-up.
Role of Emotional Intelligence in the Leader-Member Exchange
Relationship
Scott Finlinson, Ohio University
Peter Y. Chen, Colorado State University
Denise Haeggberg, HR Directions
Rowland P. Hanley, Ohio University/IBM Global Employee
Research
We examined the role
of emotional intelligence in the leader-member exchange (LMX) relationship.
Overall, there were positive relationships between both subordinates
and supervisors reported level of emotional intelligence and their reported
level of leader-member exchange quality. However,
null correlations were found between perceived LMX relationships of supervisors
(or subordinates) and emotional intelligence of correspondent subordinates (or
supervisors).
Predicting Team Performance: Analytic Techniques
for Assessing Shared Mental Models
Jacqueline A. Isenberg, University of
TennesseeChattanooga
Tonia S. Heffner, Army Research Institutes
The best analytic technique for assessing shared mental
model data gathered via similarity ratings has not yet been determined. This
project, using existing data, compared UCINET and Pathfinder to determine which
is a better predictor of team performance. Results indicate that UCINET may be
the better analytic tool.
Military Work Team Personality Composition, Norms, and
Effectiveness
Terry Halfhill, University of North Texas
Eric Sundstrom, University of Tennessee
Tjai M. Nielsen, The E-Group, Inc.
A Web-based field study examined personality composition
in 40 military teams and found group average agreeableness correlated with
supervisor-rated group performance, group average conscientiousness correlated
with aggregate individual performance, and both personality variables related to
group social norms and group cohesion.
Out of Sight, Out of Mind: Recalling Virtual Team
Contributions
Lori Foster Thompson, East Carolina University
Jonathan K. Probber, East Carolina University
Many workplace teams rely on computer-mediated
communication, yet we know little about the consequences of virtual
collaboration. This study investigates sixteen intact teams operating in
face-to-face or computer-mediated environments. Results support the predictions
that virtual teams have trouble recalling members contributions, even in the
absence of rapid consensus norms.
An Examination of the Multidimensionality of Supervisor
Perceptions of Leader-Member Exchange
John M. Ford, Louisiana State University
Gary J. Greguras, Louisiana State University
The current study developed a multidimensional scale (SLMXMDM)
to measure supervisor LMX perceptions
based on Liden and Maslyns (1998) multidimensional subordinate LMX scale (LMXMDM).
Confirmatory factor analyses supported a multidimensional
conceptualization of LMX. Regression
analyses demonstrated incremental validity for the SLMXMDM over other LMX
measures on outcome variables.
Group and Personality Influences on Withdrawal Behavior
Jason D. Shaw, University of Kentucky
Michelle K. Duffy, University of Kentucky
Eric M. Stark, Washington & Jefferson College
We examined personality moderators of the relationship
between group and individual absence and social loafing behavior among members
of 143 groups. Framed with SIP and
social-learning theories, we found that conscientiousness attenuated the
cross-level absenteeism, but not the social loafing, relationship.
Predicted moderating effects of self-esteem were not supported.
Team Coordination in High-Velocity High-Uncertainty
Environments
Sharyn Gardner, University of Maryland
Samer Faraj, University of Maryland
Yan Xiao, University of Maryland
We discuss a qualitative study of a level-1 trauma center.
Based on 6 months of intensive observation, shadowing, and interviews we
found that use of technology, communication, and coordination integrate to
create work processes characterized as composed improvisation.
Coordination must be fluid and
flexible to match levels of environmental uncertainty.
94. Symposium: Saturday, 8:30 9:50
Bel Aire Ballroom South (W)
Predicting Performance: The Interface of I-O Psychology
and Educational Research
Popular opinion and legal decisions regarding selection
are heavily influenced by highly publicized college admission procedures.
Building on recent research on work performance, this symposium focuses
on the construct of college performance and its predictors.
A multidimensional model of student performance and comprehensive
meta-analyses of criterion-related validities are presented.
Deniz S. Ones, University of Minnesota, Co-Chair
Sarah A. Hezlett, University of Minnesota, Co-Chair
Nathan R. Kuncel, University of Minnesota,
John P. Campbell, University of Minnesota,
Sarah A. Hezlett, University of Minnesota, Deniz S. Ones, University of Minnesota, Performance
in College: The Criterion Problem
Sarah A. Hezlett, University of Minnesota,
Nathan R. Kuncel, University of Minnesota,
Meredith Vey, University of Minnesota, Allison Ahart, University of Minnesota,
Deniz S. Ones, University of Minnesota,
John P. Campbell, University of Minnesota, Wayne J. Camara, The College Board, The
Predictive Validity of the SAT: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis
Meredith Vey, University of Minnesota,
Sarah A. Hezlett, University of Minnesota,
Nathan R. Kuncel, University of Minnesota, Allison Ahart, University of Minnesota,
Deniz S. Ones, University of Minnesota,
John P. Campbell, University of Minnesota, Wayne J. Camara, The College Board, Bias
and the SAT: A Meta-Analysis of Differential Prediction by Race and Gender
Allison Ahart, University of Minnesota,
Sarah A. Hezlett, University of Minnesota,
Nathan R. Kuncel, University of Minnesota, Meredith Vey, University of Minnesota,
Deniz S. Ones, University of Minnesota,
John P. Campbell, University of Minnesota, Wayne J. Camara, The College Board, A
Meta-Analysis of High School Performance Predicting College Performance
95. Symposium: Saturday, 8:30 9:50
Terrace A (W)
Quasi-Experimentation in Organizations: Results, Dilemmas,
and Solutions
Three quasi-experiments will be discussed.
An interrupted time-series examination of stress and job satisfaction,
supervisory training evaluated by participants and their subordinates, and a
Solomon 4group evaluation of attitude training each presented unique
dilemmas. Presenters will describe
the challenges of implementing such designs in organizational settings.
Kimberly T. Schneider, State Farm Insurance Company, Chair
Julie A. Fuller, Bowling Green State University,
Jeffrey M. Stanton, Bowling Green State University, Gwenith G. Fisher, Bowling Green State University,
Christiane Spitzmueller, Bowling Green State University, Steven Russell, Bowling Green State
University, Patricia
C. Smith, Bowling Green State University, Quasi-Experimentation
in Organizational Research:
An Example Using an Interrupted Time Series Design
Kimberly T. Schneider, State Farm Insurance Company,
Randall C. Overton, State Farm Insurance Company, A
Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of the Effectiveness of First Line Supervisor
Training
Sharon Goto, Pomona College, Phanikiran Radhakrishnan, University of
TorontoScarborough, Planning
for Situational Constraints: Effects on Behavioral Intentions and Training
Effectiveness
96. Roundtable: Saturday, 8:30 9:50
Catalina (W)
Organizational Decision Making with Multirater Instruments
This roundtable
discussion will review what we know about the reliability, validity, and utility
of using 360 methodology for organizational decision making. More specifically, we will describe how 360 methodology can
be used in conjunction with personality, cognitive ability, and assessment
center methods to make better succession planning decisions.
Robert E. Lewis, Personnel Decisions International, Host
Gordon J. Curphy, Personnel Decisions International, Presenter
Dianne Nilsen, Personnel Decisions International, Presenter
Chet Robie, Niagara University, Presenter
97. Symposium: Saturday, 8:30 9:50
Point Loma B (W)
Raising and Extending Self-Efficacy Research to New Levels
and Domains
The role of self-efficacy in organizational settings has
been widely studied, yet much remains to be learned. The research presented in
this symposium contributes to self-efficacy research by developing and testing
multilevel models of efficacy beliefs, describing new techniques of measuring
self-efficacy, and extending self-efficacy theory into new research domains.
Dov Eden, Tel Aviv University, Chair
Lance E. Anderson, Caliber Associates,
Stephan J. Motowidlo, University of Minnesota, Norman G. Peterson, American Institutes for Research, Development
of Three Self-Efficacy Measures and Evaluation of their Incremental Validity
Relative to Traditional Predictors
Wendy J. Casper,
Caliber Associates, Measuring Self-Efficacy and Locus of Control of the WorkNonwork
Interface
Gilad Chen, George Mason University,
Paul D. Bliese, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Steve M. Jex, University of
WisconsinOshkosh/W Reed, Examination
of the Predictors of Self-Efficacy and Collective Efficacy: Evidence for
Discontinuity across Levels of Analysis
Stanley M. Gully, Rutgers University,
Aparna Joshi, Rutgers University,
Kara Incalcaterra, George Mason University, Relationships
among Team-Efficacy, Self-Efficacy, and Performance: A Meta-Analysis
John E. Mathieu, University of Connecticut, Discussant
|