Home Home | About Us | Sitemap | Contact  
  • Info For
  • Professionals
  • Students
  • Educators
  • Media
  • Search
    Powered By Google

Sunday AM


Special Sunday morning programming has been selected on the topic of The Future of I-O Psychology Research, Teaching, and Practice: What Lies Ahead for the Next 20 Years? These 22 themed sessions are marked with the following symbol:


236. Symposium: Sunday, 8:009:50 Avalon (Level 3)

Cut Scores in Employment Discrimination Cases: Where We Are Today

The past 5 years of employment discrimination cases has engendered debate about selection cut scores. This symposium reviews key issues in recent court decisions and evaluates existing cut score methods against emerging legal criteria. Implications are discussed for methodology and human resource policy.

Jerard F. Kehoe, Selection & Assessment Consulting, Chair

Angie L. Olson, SHL, A Historical Review of Key Cases and Court Decisions Regarding Cut Scores

Jerard F. Kehoe, Selection & Assessment Consulting, A Review of Key Methodological Issues

P. Richard Jeanneret, Jeanneret & Associates, Inc., Reflections on the Delaware Case: Authorities and Reverse Regression

Bernard R. Siskin, LECG, Statistical Issues in Setting Cutoff Scores

Wayne S. Flick, Latham & Watkins, L.L.P., The View From Counsels Table

Frank J. Landy, SHL, The Socio-Political and Policy Context of Cut Scores

Submitted by Jerard F. Kehoe, jkehoe@selectionconsulting.com

237. Symposium: Sunday, 8:009:20 San Gabriel A (Lobby Level)

New Theoretical Approaches Linking the WorkFamily Interface and OHP

This symposium explores theoretical and methodological approaches that can help the field of occupational health psychology advance in understanding complex relationships between work and family. Theoretical and empirical studies that examine the workfamily interface from the perspectives of individual, dyad, and organizational level phenomena will be presented.

Janet L. Barnes-Farrell, University of Connecticut, Chair

Russell A. Matthews, University of Connecticut, Co-Chair

Jennifer C. Cullen, Portland State University, Leslie B. Hammer, Portland State University, WorkFamily Conflict and Employee Safety Performance: Presentation of a Theoretical Model

Nancy Yanchus, University of Georgia, Lillian T. Eby, University of Georgia, Sabrina Drollinger, University of Georgia, The Impact of Emotional Labor on WorkFamily Balance Outcomes

Russell A. Matthews, University of Connecticut, Regan Del Priore, University of Connecticut, Linda K. Acitelli, University of Houston, Partner Perceptions of Work-to-Family Conflict as a Crossover Moderator: A Dyadic Study Design

Alicia A. Grandey, Pennsylvania State University, Bryanne L. Cordeiro, Pennsylvania State University, Candace Blair Cronin, Pennsylvania State University, Breaking Down the Barriers: The Moderating Role of Family-Friendly Culture on the Family Needs-Policy Use Relationship

Julian I. Barling, Queens University, Discussant

Submitted by Russell A. Matthews, Russell.Matthews@uconn.edu

238. Education Forum: Sunday, 8:009:50  San Gabriel C (Lobby Level)

Teaching Diversity: Building Multicultural Competence for the Next Twenty Years

This forum will focus on building multicultural competence through diversity instruction. Brief presentations will identify unique issues involved in diversity instruction and provide techniques to facilitate diversity instruction in diversity courses as well as throughout the curriculum. An extended question and answer period will also allow for audience interaction.

Kecia M. Thomas, University of Georgia, Chair

C. Douglas Johnson, Michelin North America, Resistance to Integrating Diversity into I-O and OB Courses
Derek R. Avery, Saint Josephs University, Dealing With Political Correctness in Diversity Management Education

Wendy Reynolds-Dobbs, University of Georgia, Amanda G. Gewin, University of Georgia, Kecia M. Thomas, University of Georgia, Confronting Diversity Resistance: Identifying Diversity-Related Fears and Hopes

Donna Chrobot-Mason, University of Colorado-Denver, Diversity Drama: Developing Multicultural Competence Through Interactive Theatre

Peter D. Bachiochi, Eastern Connecticut State University, Demonstrating Social Class and Addressing Stereotypes of the Poor

Mark D. Agars, California State University-San Bernardino, The Benefits of Integrating Diversity Concepts in Core I-O Courses

Jimmy Davis, University of Georgia, Discussant

Submitted by Kecia M. Thomas, kthomas@uga.edu

240. Symposium: Sunday, 8:009:50 Santa Barbara A (Lobby Level)

Modeling Dynamic Criteria: New Insights for Theories Involving Longitudinal Change

This symposium presents 4 unique studies utilizing longitudinal data to examine dynamic criteria. Results illustrate how typical criterion measures taken at a single point in time fail to capture important effects related to team dynamics, employee turnover intentions, individual contribution to organizations, and performance relationships with cognitive tests by race.

Greg L. Stewart, University of Iowa, Chair

John E. Mathieu, University of Connecticut, Tammy L. Woods, University of Connecticut, Laying the Foundation for Successful Team Performance Trajectories: The Roles of Team Charters and Deliberate Plans

Gilad Chen, Texas A&M University, Robert E. Ployhart, University of South Carolina, Paul D. Bliese, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Explaining Turnover Intentions: Changes Over Time in Job Attitudes Matter

Greg L. Stewart, University of Iowa, Amit K. Nandkeolyar, University of Iowa, Understanding Situational Factors as Explanations for Unsystematic Variation in Intraindividual Performance Outcomes

Donald G. Gardner, University of Colorado-Colorado Springs, Diana L. Deadrick, Old Dominion University, Moderating Effects of Race on the AbilityPerformance Relationship Over Time

Paul J. Hanges, University of Maryland, Discussant

Submitted by Greg L. Stewart, Greg-Stewart@uiowa.edu

241. Academic-Practitioner Collaborative Forum: Sunday, 8:009:50 
Santa Barbara B (Lobby Level)

The Future of Leadership Development and Selection: What Lies Ahead?

The past several years have seen an increased interest in leadership selection and development at both the academic and professional levels. This forum offers the opportunity to discover if there is currently alignment and congruence between leadership academies and the competencies required and desired in the business and corporate environment. A discussion on past, current, and future collaborative efforts between academics, leadership academies, and practitioners in regards to leadership selection and development will be presented.

Mark C. Frame, University of Texas-Arlington, Chair

Ashley Tipton, University of Texas-Arlington, Co-Chair

Dale Thompson, Leadership Worth Following, Discussant

Scott C. Erker, DDI, Discussant

James Campbell Quick, University of Texas-Arlington, Discussant

Andrew A. Rivers, Bowling Green State University, Discussant

Jay Conger, Claremont McKenna College, Discussant

Submitted by Ashley Tipton, ashley@lifeexpeditions.com

242. Practitioner Forum: Sunday, 8:009:50  Santa Barbara C (Lobby Level)

Getting Action From Organizational Surveys: A Discussion of New Methodologies

Authors from the New Methods section of Allen Krauts upcoming (2005) SIOP Professional Practices Series book, Getting Action From Organizational Surveys: New Concepts, Methods, and Applications, will highlight their findings. Each presenter will discuss new methodologies at a different stage (planning, administration, analysis, and reporting/follow-up) of the typical survey program.

Kyle Lundby, Gantz Wiley Research, Chair

Joe Colihan, IBM, Janine Waclawski, Pepsi-Cola Company, Pulse Surveys: The Era of Modern Polling Enters the Workplace

Kristofer J. Fenlason, Data Recognition Corp, Kathleen J. Suckow, Microsoft Corporation, Leveraging Web Functionality to Improve Surveys

Jeff W. Johnson, Personnel Decisions Research Institutes, Kyle Lundby, Gantz Wiley Research, Relative Weights of Predictors: What is Important When Many Forces are Operating

Marc C. A. Berwald, Clear Picture Corporation, Planning, Taking, and Managing Action to Improve Survey Results

Allen I. Kraut, Baruch College/Kraut Associates, Discussant

Submitted by Kyle Lundby, klundby@gantzwiley.com

243. Symposium: Sunday, 8:009:50 Beaudry A (Lobby Level)

Off the Beaten Path: Investigations Into Neglected OCB Topics

Although organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) has been widely studied, important topics have been slighted. This session involves investigations into neglected topics including negative consequences of OCB; relationships between OCB, group process variables, and team performance; and links between OCB theory and transaction cost economics. Attendees may find the results surprising.

Dennis W. Organ, Indiana University, Chair

Linn Van Dyne, Michigan State University, Jennifer B. Ellis, Michigan State University, Job Creep, Complaints, and Criticism: Reactance and Defensive Voice as Consequences of OCB

Thomas E. Becker, University of Delaware, Negative Consequences of Prosocial Behaviors in Organizations
Dennis W. Organ, Indiana University, Jeong-Yeon Lee, Indiana University, Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Transaction Cost Economics

Ronald F. Piccolo, University of Florida, Jeffery A. LePine, University of Florida, Christine Jackson, Purdue University, Group Processes and Group Performance: Not Much More Than Members Organizational Citizenship Behavior

Stephan J. Motowidlo, University of Minnesota, Discussant

Submitted by Thomas E. Becker, beckert@lerner.udel.edu

248. Special Event: Sunday, 8:309:50 San Jose (Level 2)

Symposium: The Changing Face of Work

This session is designed to discuss upcoming trends likely to impact the management of people in organizations in the next 20 years. Presenters will discuss technology, legal, and a variety of other workforce trends expected to influence future organizational practices in the private and public sectors.

Wayne F. Cascio, University of Colorado, Chair

Leo Brajkovich, Gantz Wiley Research, Presenter

R. Jason Weiss, DDI, Presenter

Brian S. OLeary, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Presenter

David W. Arnold, NCS Pearson, Inc., Presenter

250. Panel Discussion: Sunday, 8:309:50   Emerald Bay (Level 3)

You Want Me to do What? Internet-Age Consulting Challenges

New technologies and business demands influence how organizations deploy staffing systems. In this environment, traditional best-practice guidance may not meet clients needs. This session will examine common requests from business and present best-practice suggestions from panelists representing several I-O firms. Issues will focus on assessment quality, efficiency, and legal risk.

Douglas H. Reynolds, DDI, Chair

James C. Beaty, ePredix, Panelist

Sarah S. Fallaw, Qwiz, Inc., Panelist

Nathan J. Mondragon, Taleo, Panelist

Mark J. Schmit, SHL USA, Inc, Panelist

Evan F. Sinar, DDI, Panelist

Submitted by Douglas H. Reynolds, doug.reynolds@ddiworld.com

252. Panel Discussion: Sunday, 8:309:50  San Gabriel B (Lobby Level)

Doctoral Training in I-O Psychology: Current Trends and Future Needs

Represented by SIOP membership, and the number of graduate programs, I-O psychology has grown over the past 20 years. Continued success of I-O psychology as a discipline depends largely on training and education. This panel will discuss current and future needs of doctoral training in I-O psychology from multiple perspectives.

Jesse S. Michel, Wayne State University, Co-Chair

Jenell L. Senter, Wayne State University, Co-Chair

Michael B. Hargis, Wayne State University, Co-Chair

James M. LeBreton, Wayne State University, Co-Chair

Milton Hakel, Bowling Green State University, Panelist

Sigrid B. Gustafson, American Institutes for Research, Panelist

Jeffrey D. Facteau, Hogan Assessment Systems, Panelist

Thomas W. Mason, Personnel Decisions International, Panelist

Nancy T. Tippins, Personnel Research Associates, Inc., Panelist

Julia McElreath, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Panelist

Submitted by Jesse S. Michel, jmichel@wayne.edu

253. Symposium: Sunday, 8:309:50 San Bernardino (Lobby Level)

Measuring and Changing Attitudinal Barriers Toward Hiring People With Disabilities

Many Americans with disabilities have not received employment parity with the rest of the population because many employers hold negative attitudes about people with disabilities. The papers in this symposium describe recent research projects that address this need by exploring the reliability and validity of different attitudinal measures to disability.

Nathan D. Ainspan, Department of Labor, Chair

Megan Leasher, Wright State University, Corey E. Miller, Wright State University, Rater Effects and Attitudinal Barriers Affecting People with Disabilities in Personnel Selection

Izabela Schultz, University of British Columbia, Employer Attitudes Towards Psychological/
Neuropsychological Disabilities and Job Accommodation in Mental Health Conditions

James D. Westaby, Columbia University, Matt Kleinman, Columbia University, Avina Gupta, Columbia University, The Role of Work on Quality of Life for Individuals With Disabilities

Adrian Thomas, Auburn University, Andrea L. Doyle, Tennessee Department of Personnel, Development of an Implicit Association Test Measuring Attitudes Toward Individuals with Disabilities

Susanne M. Bruyere, Cornell University, Discussant

Submitted by Nathan D. Ainspan, Nate@Ainspan.com

261. Special Event: Sunday, 10:3011:20  San Jose (Level 2)

Panel Discussion: The Future of I-O Psychology

This session is designed to discuss the future of I-O psychology. Panelists will discuss where I-O psychology as a whole is heading as well as prospects for specific aspects of the field, such as teaching, research, and practice. Discussion will be informed by results of a survey of SIOP members.

Fritz Drasgow, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Chair

Robert T. Hogan, Hogan Assessment Systems, Presenter

William H. Macey, Personnel Research Associates, Presenter

Kevin R. Murphy, Pennsylvania State University, Presenter

Lois E. Tetrick, George Mason University, Presenter

263. Panel Discussion: Sunday, 10:3011:50  Avalon (Level 3)

Robots in the Workplace: What Lies Ahead?

This panel discussion presents the emerging field of humanrobot interaction as a potential research area in industrial-organizational psychology over the next 20 years. Topics to be discussed include the cognitive, social, and emotional issues that impact humanrobot interaction and the potential impact of robotic technology in the workplace.

Jennifer L. Burke, University of South Florida, Chair

Michael D. Coovert, University of South Florida, Co-Chair

Clifford J. Nass, Stanford University, Co-Chair

Robin R. Murphy, University of South Florida, Panelist

Erika Rogers, California Polytechnic State University, Panelist

Submitted by Jennifer L. Burke, jlburke4@mail.usf.edu

264. Conversation Hour: Sunday, 10:3011:20    Emerald Bay (Level 3)

Alternative Careers for I-O Psychologists: An Emerging Trend?

As our discipline has gained a reputation for generating good research methodologists, some I-O psychologists have found opportunities to work in other disciplines. This conversation hour provides opportunities for current and future I-O psychologists to discuss research and funding opportunities that are outside the normal bounds of our discipline.

Mark Alan Smith, American Institutes for Research, Host

David P. Baker, American Institutes for Research, Co-Host

Fred A. Mael, American Institutes for Research, Co-Host

Scott H. Oppler, American Institutes for Research, Co-Host

Submitted by Mark Alan Smith, msmith@air.org

265. Symposium: Sunday, 10:3011:50 San Fernando (Lobby Level)

Emerging Multicultural Team Theory and Research

Global economic, political, and social interdependencies are driving an emphasis on multicultural teamwork. This symposium reports on cutting-edge theory building and research undertaken to investigate the nature of multicultural teams. Specifically, we present the findings from 2 predominately theoretical initiatives as well as the results from 2 empirical studies.

C. Shawn Burke, University of Central Florida, Chair

Janet Sutton, Army Research Lab, Linda G. Pierce, Army Research Laboratory-Aberdeen, Eduardo Salas, University of Central Florida, C. Shawn Burke, University of Central Florida, Cultural Adaptability

C. Shawn Burke, University of Central Florida, Eduardo Salas, University of Central Florida, Kevin C. Stagl, University of Central Florida, Katherine A. Wilson-Donnelly, Institute for Simulation & Training, Linda G. Pierce, Army Research Laboratory-Aberdeen, Team Adaptation in Multicultural Teams: A Theoretical Forum

Donald D. Davis, Old Dominion University, Janet L. Bryant, Old Dominion University, Katherine A. Selgrade, Old Dominion University, Heather J. Downey, Old Dominion University, Impact of Cultural Composition and Cultural Values on Teamwork

Karen Goh, University of Southern California, Emotion Suppression and Conflict Management in Virtual Teams

Cristina B. Gibson, University of California-Irvine, Discussant

Submitted by Kevin C. Stagl, kcs224488@hotmail.com

266. Symposium: Sunday, 10:3011:50 San Gabriel A (Lobby Level)

New Evidence on Individual Differences in Job Analysis Ratings

Researchers from academic and applied settings will present new findings on a variety of individual and group differences in job analysis ratings. Variables to be addressed include rater demographics, position level, tenure, and conscientiousness. Implications for rater selection and the reliability and accuracy of job information will be discussed.

Chad H. Van Iddekinge, HumRRO, Chair

Robert E. Ployhart, University of South Carolina, Deborah K. Ford, CPS Human Resource Services, Meta-Analytic Estimates of Subgroup Differences in Job Analysis Ratings

Kristin Freund Murphy, Nortel Networks, Mark A. Wilson, North Carolina State University, Factors Affecting the Accuracy, Reliability, and Validity of Task Ratings

Chad H. Van Iddekinge, HumRRO, Patrick H. Raymark, Clemson University, Carl E. Eidson, Wilson Learning Corporation, The Accuracy and Incremental Value of Needed at Entry Ratings

Robert J. Harvey, Virginia Tech, IRT Strategies for Identifying Rater Quality in Job Analysis Ratings

Edward L. Levine, University of South Florida, Discussant

Submitted by Chad H. Van Iddekinge, cvaniddekinge@humrro.org

267. Roundtable: Sunday, 10:3011:50 San Gabriel B (Lobby Level)

Should SIOP Develop a Masters Student Consortium?

Directors of I-O and I-O HRM masters programs, MA/MS students and faculty, masters level practitioners, and job placement directors are invited to consider the desirability, feasibility, and potential content of a SIOP Masters Consortium. Data from a national survey of program directors and students will serve as the basis for discussion.

Timothy J. Huelsman, Appalachian State University, Host

Geneva M. Phillips, The Boeing Company, Co-Host

Gwenith G. Fisher, Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of Michigan, Co-Host

Nora P. Reilly, Radford University, Co-Host

Submitted by Nora P. Reilly, nreilly@radford.edu

268. Education Forum: Sunday, 10:3011:20  San Gabriel C (Lobby Level)

I-O Undergraduate Education: Identity, Challenges, and New Directions

While SIOP provides guidelines for graduate education in I-O, undergraduate exposure to I-O varies. Presenters will discuss I-O education in introductory psychology, as presented in popular I-O and OB textbooks, and as a possible undergraduate concentration. I-O identity and the benefits of systematic undergraduate I-O education will be discussed.

Alice F. Stuhlmacher, DePaul University, Chair

Douglas C. Maynard, SUNY New Paltz, Exposing Introductory Psychology Students to I-O: Challenges and Resources

Maryalice Citera, SUNY New Paltz, Alice F. Stuhlmacher, DePaul University, Anne-Sophie Deprez-Sims, DePaul University, I-O by the Book: A Review of I-O and OB Undergraduate Textbooks

Jane A. Halpert, DePaul University, I-O Psychology at the Bachelors Degree Level: Effective Education for Most of our Students

Submitted by Alice F. Stuhlmacher, astuhlma@depaul.edu

270. Theoretical Advancement: Sunday, 10:3011:50   Santa Barbara A (Lobby Level)

Types of Outstanding Leadership: Advancements From a Sensemaking Approach

We propose a new theoretical model exploring 3 alternative pathways to outstanding leadership: charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic. Based largely on sensemaking following a crisis, we propose that the 3 alternative types represent distinct, yet equally viable pathways. Empirical results from initial model testing and future research opportunities will be discussed. 

Michael D. Mumford, University of Oklahoma, Chair

Ginamarie Millar Scott, Psychological Consultants, Co-Chair

Jill Mowry Strange, Self-Employed, Co-Chair

Michael D. Mumford, University of Oklahoma, Ginamarie Millar Scott, Psychological Consultants, Jill Mowry Strange, Self-Employed, Katrina Elizabeth Bedell, University of Oklahoma, Sam T. Hunter, University of Oklahoma, Types of Outstanding Leadership: Advancements From a Sensemaking Approach

Submitted by Jill Mowry Strange, jill_strange@hotmail.com

271. Symposium: Sunday, 10:3011:50 Santa Barbara B (Lobby Level)

New Ventures: A Fertile Ground for Testing and Refining I-Os Theories

Entrepreneurship researchers have increasingly drawn on the findings and theories of I-O psychology in studying the entrepreneurial process. However, I-O psychologists have largely overlooked new ventures as a potentially useful research setting. This symposium focuses on the potential benefits to I-O psychology of working in this new context.

Robert A. Baron, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Chair

J. Robert Baum, University of Maryland, New Ventures: A Beneficial Setting for Motivation Research

Edwin A. Locke, University of Maryland, The Relationship Between General Traits and Situationally Specific Goals in New Ventures

Michael Frese, University of Giessen, Towards a Concept of Planning: A Facet of Success in Entrepreneurship

Robert A. Baron, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, New Ventures: A Useful Arena for Research on Individual Difference Factors

Angelo S. DeNisi, Texas A&M University, Discussant

Submitted by J. Robert Baum, jrbaum@rhsmith.umd.edu

272. Practitioner Forum: Sunday, 10:3011:50 
Santa Barbara C (Lobby Level)
Global Employee Surveying: Past, Present, and Future
The globalization of organizations today has drastically impacted all aspects of business, including employee surveys. Practitioners from 4 global Fortune 500 organizations, each with flourishing survey programs, will share their experiences, insights, and observations regarding global employee opinion surveying in the past, present, and into the future.

Mathian (Mat) Osicki, IBM, Chair

Allan H. Church, PepsiCo, The Changing Nature of Surveys

Mathian (Mat) Osicki, IBM, The Evolution of Employee Surveying at IBM

Linda S. Carr, Sun Microsystems, The Application of Sun Sigma Tools in a Global Survey Program

Michele L. Ehler, Dow Chemical Company, Jennifer H. Frame, Dow Chemical Company, Generating Income as an Internal Consultant: Licensing of a Global Survey to Joint Ventures

Submitted by Mathian (Mat) Osicki, mosicki@us.ibm.com

273. Practitioner Forum: Sunday, 10:3011:50   San Bernardino (Lobby Level)

Comments: Where Have We Been? Where Are We Going?

A look backward at comments is provided through histories of comment use and lessons learned in various organizational survey/360-feedback programs (e.g., rater training, safeguards). A look forward is provided by reporting on the application of new analyses and speculation about future improvements and technology options to increase comment utility.

Kristofer J. Fenlason, Data Recognition Corp, Chair

Kelly A. Burke, Payless ShoeSource, Inc., Terrance W. Gaylord, Payless ShoeSource, Inc., Using 360 Comments to Direct and Impact Development Plans

Frederick M. Siem, The Boeing Company, Liberty J. Munson, The Boeing Company, History of Survey Comments at The Boeing Company

Tom Rauzi, Dell Inc., Two Attempts to Improve the Quality of 360 Survey Comments

Carrie Christianson DeMay, Data Recognition Corporation, Anna Chandonnet, Data Recognition Corporation, Kristofer J. Fenlason, Data Recognition Corporation, Realizing the Full Potential of Open-Ended Comments: Leveraging Online Technology

Submitted by Anna Chandonnet, achandonnet@datarecognitioncorp.com

Program Table of Contents