20. Symposium: Friday, 12:00 - 1:20 Marquis IV
False Issues and New Perspectives: Realigning
Recruiting Research for the 21st Century
Interest in recruiting appears to be at an all-time high. The current symposium brings
together theory, research, and practical ideas about recruiting. The various perspectives
offered establish a comprehensive knowledge base that will help both academics and
practitioners move recruiting into the 21st century.
Mary L. Connerley, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Chair
Kurt Kraiger, University of ColoradoDenver, False Issues in
Recruiting
Kevin D. Carlson, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Mary L.
Connerley, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Reconceptualizing
Recruiting: A Process Model of Recruiting Strategy Development
Daniel M. Cable, University of North Carolina, Opening the "Black
Box" in the Recruitment Literature Through a Brand Equity Perspective
Chris Collins, University of Maryland, Cynthia Kay Stevens, University of
Maryland, Initial Organizational Images and Recruitment: A Within-Subjects
Investigation of the Factors Affecting Job Choices
James A. Breaugh, University of MissouriSt Louis, Discussant
Daniel B. Turban, University of Missouri, Discussant
21. Symposium: Friday, 12:00 - 1:20 Madrid/Trinidad
Using Computers for Training Delivery: Cbt, Wbt, Isd, and Me
This symposium will examine the use of computers as a medium for training delivery.
Each paper examines real-life applications of computer-based (CBT) or web-based (WBT)
training and draws on theory and research to address practical issues in the instructional
systems design (ISD) processes of needs assessment, design, implementation, and
evaluation.
Sandra L. Fisher, Personnel Decisions Research Institutes, Co-Chair
Kenneth G. Brown, University of Iowa, Co-Chair
Ann W. Howell, Strategic Interactive, Hyperlinking to Success: Designing
Web-Based Training for Individual and Organizational Success
Kenneth G. Brown, University of Iowa, Individual Differences and Success
in Web-Based Training
Sandra L. Fisher, Personnel Decisions Research Institutes, Amy L. Unckless,
Towers Perrin, Evaluating Computer-Based Training in a Multi-faceted Learning
Environment
J. Kevin Ford, Michigan State University, Discussant
Stuart Gittelman, Interactive Media, Discussant
22. Symposium: Friday, 12:00 - 1:20 Consulate
Emerging Topics in the Careers Landscape:
New Concepts, Approaches, & Discoveries
Employees career experiences have changed dramatically in two decades, impelling
an emergence of "new" topics in the careers literature, as well as new
approaches to "older" career issues. This symposium discusses five emerging
topics in todays career landscape: managerial career paths, work-life balance,
relocation, contingent work, and psychological contracts.
Cynthia A. Prehar, Colorado State University, Chair
Joy Schneer, Rider University, Frieda Reitman, Pace University, Managerial
Careers: Are They Following a New Path?
Karen J. Crooker, University of WisconsinMilwaukee, Faye L. Smith,
Emporia State University, Filiz Tabak, Towson University, Tidy Lives: Exploring the
Relationship between Resource Munificence and Engagement Dissonance
Cynthia A. Prehar, Colorado State University, A Longitudinal
Investigation of Relocation Behaviors and Willingness to Relocate
Deborah L. Kidder, University of Connecticut, Alternative Career
Experiences: A Comparison of Full-Time and Temporary Nurses
Lynn M. Shore, Georgia State University, Lois E. Tetrick, University of
Houston, Kevin Barksdale, The Hutton Group, Transactional and Relational Exchange
Relationships
Linda K. Stroh, Loyola University Chicago, Discussant
Belle Rose Ragins, University of WisconsinMilwaukee, Discussant
23. Roundtable: Friday, 12:00 - 1:20 Sydney
The Employment Interview: Current Issues in Research and Practice
The reputation of the employment interview has been greatly enhanced in the last 10
years, but many questions remain unanswered. The purpose of this roundtable is for both
practitioners and researchers to discuss important remaining issues such as barriers to
structured interviewing.
Michael M. Harris, University of Missouri, Co-Host
Robert W. Eder, Portland State University, Co-Host
24. Panel Discussion: Friday, 12:00 - 12:50 Intl Salon G
Strategies for Development and Distribution of Psychological Measures
Test developers are confronted with the issue of how to market and maintain their
instruments. Panelists representing three possible models for resolving this issue will
share their perspectives. This discussion will help panelists and audience members
understand the benefits and drawbacks of each model.
William K. Balzer, Bowling Green State University, Co-Chair
Karen Ury, Bowling Green State University, Co-Chair
Peter D. Bachiochi, Eastern Connecticut State University, Panelist
Kimberly R. Brinkmeyer, CDR Assessment Group, Panelist
Sandra E. Parham, SHL Landy Jacobs, Inc., Panelist
25. Roundtable: Friday, 12:00 - 1:20 Sydney
I-O Psychology and Small Business: Size Does Not Matter
This roundtable will discuss the use of I-O practices in small businesses and identify
ways we can assist these businesses or any organization faced with the dilemma of small
samples. Topics for discussion include job analysis, validation, technical feasibility,
and costs associated with I-O practices in small businesses.
Jared D. Lock, Jeanneret & Associates, Co-Host
Mark H. Strong, Jeanneret & Associates, Co-Host
26. Practitioner Forum: Friday, 12:30 - 1:20 Marquis IIIv
"Best Practices" for Enhancing Assessment Validity
Through Rater Selection and Training
Many assessment procedures depend heavily on the accuracy of rater judgments.
Historically, suggestions for reducing rater errors have focused on rater training and the
structure of assessment devices. This forum examines current issues in rater accuracy and
suggests practical ways, through examples of "best practices," to deal with
these issues.
Elizabeth B. Kolmstetter, FBI, Chair
Russell E. Lobsenz, FBI, Selecting the Best to Select the Best
Christopher T. Rotolo, Sirota Consulting Group, It Is Never Too Late For
Agreement: Enhancing Inter-Rater Agreement During the Assessment Process
Jill K. Wheeler, GEICO, Laura S. Hamill, Microsoft Corporation, Practical
Considerations Related to Interviewer and Assessor Training
27. Panel Discussion: Friday, 12:30 - 1:50 Intl Salon A
International Global Perspectives on Issues in I-O Psychology
The panel will present a global perspective on current I-O topics and discuss ways in
which membership in the Organizational Psychology Division of the International
Association of Applied Psychology can facilitate SIOP members learning and research
on global issues. Members of the divisions Executive Committee will lead the
discussion.
Virginia E. Schein, Gettysburg College, Chair
Miriam Erez, Technion Institute of Technology, Panelist
H. Peter Dachler, University of St. Gallen, Panelist
Weining C. Chang, National University of Singapore, Panelist
28. Symposium: Friday, 1:00 - 2:50 Copenhagenv
Air Traffic Selection and Training Project
In a large-scale research project, computerized predictors for FAA Air Traffic
Controllers were developed and validated. The test battery included simulation,
multitasking, scanning, memory, math, and personality tests to capture the unique set of
abilities required by controllers. The criteria consisted of multi-source performance
ratings and two computer simulations. The unique job under investigation and
organizational context issues presented many challenges to the researchers. Statistically
significant relations between predictor and criterion measures were found.
Robert A. Ramos, HumRRO, Chair
Robert A. Ramos, HumRRO, AT-SAT: Overview of an Ambitious Project
Ned Reese, Federal Aviation Administration, AT-SAT: Organizational
Context Issues
Walter C. Borman, University of South Florida/Personnel Decisions Research
Institutes, Jerry W. Hedge, Personnel Decisions Research Institutes, Mary Ann Hanson,
Personnel Decisions Research Institutes, Kenneth T. Bruskiewicz, Personnel Decisions
Research Institutes, Henry Mogilka, Federal Aviation Administration, Carol Manning,
Federal Aviation Administration, Laura Bunch, University of South Florida/Personnel
Decisions Research Institutes, Kristen Horgen, University of South Florida/Personnel
Decisions Research Institutes, Development and Construct Validation of Air Traffic
Controller Criterion Measures
Lauress Wise, HumRRO, William F. Kieckhaefer, RGI, Inc., Janis S. Houston,
Personnel Decisions Research Institutes, Development of Air Traffic Controller
Predictor Battery
Ray Morath, Caliber Associates, J. Anthony Bayless, Caliber Associates,
Claudette Archambault, Caliber Associates, Linkage of AT-SAT Predictors to
Controller Worker Requirements
Gordon Waugh, HumRRO, Lauress Wise, HumRRO, Doug Quartetti, HumRRO, Robert A.
Ramos, HumRRO, Validation of the Air Traffic Controller Predictor Tests
Michael C. Heil, Federal Aviation Administration, Rebecca Agen, Federal
Aviation Administration, Clara Williams, Federal Aviation Administration, The
Effects of Practice and Coaching on Personnel Selection Decision Making
29. Panel Discussion: Friday, 1:00 - 2:50 Intl Salon B
Mergers, Acquisitions, and the Human Resource Function in
Organizations
The role of human resource personnel during organizational mergers is becoming more
widely recognized. Six I-O psychologists who have consulted with and experienced merging
organizations will discuss their role in mergers and the manner in which these events
affect, and are affected by, human resource activities.
Barbara L. Kruse, LOMA, Chair
Dennis Adsit, Rath & Strong, Panelist
David P. Jones, Aon Consulting, Panelist
Lisa Bordinat, Aon Consulting, Panelist
Bruce N. Barge, Aon Consulting, Panelist
Nancy T. Tippins, GTE, Panelist
30. Symposium: Friday, 1:00 - 2:50 Intl Salon D
Recent Advances in Knowledge About Retirement Decisions and Behaviors
As the available workforce ages, it becomes imperative for organizations to develop a
clear understanding of issues that affect workers retirement decisions and
post-retirement behaviors. This symposium presents recent empirical research that sheds
new light on individual, organizational and environmental variables that play a role in
retirement decisions and outcomes.
Janet L. Barnes-Farrell, University of Connecticut, Co-Chair
Kenneth S. Shultz, California State UniversitySan Bernardino, Co-Chair
Gary A. Adams, University of WisconsinOshkosh, Julie Prescher, University
of WisconsinOshkosh, Terry A. Beehr, Central Michigan University, Lawrence Lepisto,
Central Michigan University, Applying Work-Role Attachment Theory to Retirement
Decision-making
Janet L. Barnes-Farrell, University of Connecticut, Angela Lynch, IBM Global
Employee Research, R. James Holzworth, University of Connecticut, The Decision to
Retire Early: A Social Judgment Analysis
Kenneth S. Shultz, California State UniversitySan Bernardino, The
Influence of Health and Voluntariness on Retirement Decisions
Thomas Stetz, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Terry A. Beehr, Central
Michigan University, Environment and Retirement: Environmental Munificence,
Dynamism, and Local Area Unemployment Rate as Predictors of Womens Retirement
Tracy L. Lindbo, California State UniversitySan Bernardino, Kenneth S.
Shultz, California State UniversitySan Bernardino, Modeling Individuals
Post-Retirement Behaviors Toward Their Former Organization
James L. Farr, Pennsylvania State University, Discussant
31. Symposium: Friday, 1:00 - 2:50 Intl Salon E
Criterion-Related Validation Puzzles: Understanding
Predictor Constructs in Context
Published criterion-related validation research focuses on statistically significant
results that affect the use of predictor measures for selection. But it is not uncommon in
practice for validation results to be nonsignificant or opposite those expected. This
symposium will describe several such "puzzling" findings and discuss their
usefulness beyond selection applications.
Robert G. Jones, Southwest Missouri State University, Chair
Michael J. Stevens, Psychological Associates, Inc., Discussant
32. Poster Session: Friday, 1:00 - 2:50 Intl Hall South Foyer
Performance Appraisal, Statistics, and Research Methods
32-1
1999 John Flanagan Award for Outstanding Student Contribution
to the SIOP Conference
Person-Job Matching in the Context of Computerized Career Information
Delivery
Chris Kubisiak, Personnel Decisions Research Institutes/University
of South Florida
Mary Ann Hanson, Personnel Decisions Research Institutes
Daren E. Buck, Personnel Decisions Research Institutes
This poster describes the evaluation of several algorithms used to match workers to
occupations using quantitative job-descriptive data. The results suggest that an
innovative, flexible, two-stage methodology that incorporates score profile and level
information at separate points in the analysis yielded the best potential person-job
matches.
32-2
The Impact of Same-Sex LMX Dyads on Performance Evaluations
Arup Varma, Loyola University
Linda K. Stroh, Loyola UniversityChicago
In a field study, the authors explored the hypothesis that females are often rated
lower than male employees as a result of the dyad composition, rather than simply a case
of male discrimination against female subordinates. Results confirmed that both male and
female supervisors exhibit positive bias toward subordinates of the same sex.
32-3
Assessing and Testing Interrater Agreement in Multi-Item Rating Scales
Michael K. Lindell, Texas A&M University
Interrater agreement in multi-item rating scales was examined by using the variance of
respondents mean scale scores as the numerator and four different random response
terms as the denominator. All four variants were inferior to the r*WG
index, which divides the average item variance by the variance of uniformly distributed
responses across items.
32-4
Impression Management by Association: Construction and Validation of a
Scale
Martha Andrews, Florida State University
K. Michele Kacmar, Florida State University
This paper presents a scale development effort for indirect impression management
tactics identified and conceptualized by Cialdini (1989). The scale was designed to
measure the connection-focused tactics of boasting, blurring, blaring, and burying. Factor
analyses of two separate data collections indicated four factors representing each of the
a priori components.
32-5
A Comparison of Three Impression Management Scales
K. Michele Kacmar, Florida State University
Dawn S. Carlson, University of Utah
A general model of impression management was used to test three different impression
management scales that encompassed a variety of impression management tactics. Results
from 203 matched pairs of supervisors and
subordinates showed that similar measures of tactics across the three scales did not
always work in the same way. Implications of these differences and opportunities for
future research are discussed.
32-6
Moderated Multiple Regression Tests Are Criterion Specific
Ronald S. Landis, Tulane University
William P. Dunlap, Tulane University
This paper demonstrates how the form of the interaction term impacts results in
moderated multiple regression (MMR). Examples illustrate that alternative analyses in
which predictor and criterion terms are inverted are not symmetrical and that a
significant interaction may be observed in one case but not the other.
32-7
Feedback Seeking and the Relationship Between
Self-Supervisor Performance Ratings
Benjamin B. Dunford, Cornell University
Jane Williams, Indiana UniversityPurdue University Indianapolis
This study examined the influence of feedback seeking on the relationship between self-
and supervisory performance ratings of 200 nurse-supervisor dyads. Contrary to
predictions, results suggested that the relationship was strongest for individuals who
sought feedback less frequently. Tenure and the self-regulation process are used as
explanatory mechanisms for this finding.
32-8
Examination of the Feedback-Seeking Process:
The Effect of Source-Supportiveness
Jami Thomas, Indiana UniversityPurdue University Indianapolis
Jane Williams, Indiana UniversityPurdue University Indianapolis
The current research study examined the feedback-seeking process to clarify how
managerial behaviors influence feedback-seeking costs and feedback-seeking frequency.
Results suggested that a source who promotes and is supportive of feedback-seeking can
positively influence perceptions of feedback-seeking costs and feedback-seeking frequency,
even for participants with negative performance expectancies.
32-9
Latent Growth Models of Individual Change: The Case of Newcomer
Adjustment
Charles E. Lance, University of Georgia
Robert J. Vandenberg, University of Georgia
The current study examined the work adjustment of newcomers over a 6-month period.
Adjustment was operationalized as individual change using a latent growth modeling
approach. Antecedents to as well as consequences of adjustment were introduced into the
model using second-order factoring procedures. Substantive and methodological implications
are discussed.
32-10
Understanding Disagreement Across Rating Sources: An Assessment
of the Measurement Equivalence of Raters
M. Kathleen Sheehan, Texas A&M University
David J. Woehr, Texas A&M University
Winston R. Bennett, Air Force Research Laboratory
Relations among ratings of multiple performance dimensions by multiple rating sources
are examined. Confirmatory factor analysis is used to evaluate a series of models
representing levels of measurement equivalence across rating sources. Results indicate the
relative impact of dimension, rating source, and unique effects on ratings. Implications
for practice (e.g., 360 feedback systems) are considered.
32-11
Personal Characteristics and Rater Congruence in Multi-Rater Feedback
James H. Brooks, DePaul University
Alice F. Stuhlmacher, DePaul University
The congruence of managerial self-ratings with supervisor and peer ratings was compared
for overall performance, contextual performance and task performance. Underraters received
the highest ratings for nearly all performance ratings. Overraters scored higher on
conscientiousness than in-agreement or underraters. No difference in extraversion between
congruence categories was found.
32-12
FOR and FOR/Observational Trainings Effects on Rating Accuracy and
Recall
Brian J. OSullivan, Illinois Institute of Technology
Sylvia Roch, Illinois Institute of Technology
The effect of FOR and FOR/Observational training on rating accuracy and behavioral
recall were examined. Results suggest that FOR training is a robust procedure that
increases rating accuracy and allows for effects to be maintained over time. In addition,
the inclusion of observational training may increase behavioral recall.
32-13
Rater Variability Training: An Alternative to Rater
Error Training and Frame-of-Reference Training
Neil M. A. Hauenstein, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
University
Jeffrey D. Facteau, Auburn University
Jean-Anne H. Schmidt, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
A new rater training paradigm, rater variability training (RVT), was evaluated against
frame-of-reference training (FOR), rater error training (RET), and structure of training
(SOT) using Cronbachs (1955) deviational accuracy components. Results indicate that
RET is detrimental to dimensional accuracy. Results indicate no empirical distinction
between RVT and FOR. Implications for rater training programs are discussed.
32-14
Rater Ability and Motivation Effects on Self-Appraisal Accuracy
Timothy P. McGonigle, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
University
Neil M. A. Hauenstein, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Influences on performance appraisal accuracy have been categorized as ability-based and
motivation-based. This study investigates the effects of rater ability and motivation
(goal orientation) on self-appraisal accuracy. Results indicate that rater training
strategies (i.e., FOR Training) can serve to improve self-appraisal accuracy.
32-15
Role Conflict and Feedback-Seeking Behavior
as Moderators in 360-Degree Assessments
Stacy L. Jackson, Washington University in St. Louis
The current study investigated the moderating effects of role conflict and feedback
seeking on the relationship between self and other responses to a 360-degree assessment.
Data from 350 participants produced 839 assessments (86% return rate). Results indicated
partial support for effects of role conflict and weak support for effects of feedback
seeking.
32-16
Statistically Correcting Rater Bias in
Multi-Rater Performance Appraisal Systems
Delbert M. Nebeker, California School of Professional Psychology
Paul Christensen, California School of Professional Psychology
Lee E. Maes, California School of Professional Psychology
Christopher Stephens, California School of Professional Psychology
What can be done to eliminate or reduce rater bias in performance appraisal and rating
systems? Bias within rating systems is one of the most persistent criticisms of
performance appraisal systems. Linear regression was found to be a remarkably robust means
to identify and correct systematic rater bias in multiple raters systems.
32-17
Implications of Imprecision in Psychological Measurement
for Moderated Multiple Regression
William M. Rogers, Grand Valley State University
By reconceptualizing the interval-ordinal scale dichotomy as a continuum of precision,
this study demonstrates that the interpretability of interaction effect size is based on
the measurement precision of both predictor and criterion. The use of non-interval
measurement scales in interactive models poses problems for the meaningful interpretation
of moderator effects.
32-18
Assessing the Robustness of Previous Supervisory Performance Rating
Models
Gary J. Greguras, Louisiana State University
William K. Balzer, Bowling Green State University
Several models of supervisory performance ratings exist. These models generally have
not been cross-validated or replicated. The current study assessed their robustness by
testing their structural models using a different sample and data collection design.
Results differed depending upon the criterion used for assessing model fit.
32-19
An Integrated and Expanded Model of Supervisory Performance Ratings
Gary J. Greguras, Louisiana State University
William K. Balzer, Bowling Green State University
To better understand the factors that influence supervisory performance ratings, the
current study hypothesized a model that integrated previous supervisory rating models and
expanded them to include a more comprehensive set of ratee, rater, and contextual
characteristics. Results indicated that the hypothesized model fit the data reasonably
well.
32-20
Strategic Issues in Reducing the Length of Psychological Measures
Evan F. Sinar, Bowling Green State University
Amanda L. Julian, Bowling Green State University
Jeffrey M. Stanton, Bowling Green State University
William K. Balzer, Bowling Green State University
Patricia C. Smith, Bowling Green State University
Luis F. Parra, William M. Mercer, Inc.
Despite the benefits of instrument brevity, literature is scarce on optimal methods for
reducing scale length. Using the JDI Norming Sample (N =
1512), we explicate conceptual and empirical frameworks for item evaluation and propose
alternative strategies for scale reduction. We discuss implications for researchers or
practitioners shortening psychological instruments.
32-21
System Knowledge, Fairness, and Beliefs About OCB:
Organizational Implications
Chera L. Haworth, University of Akron
Paul E. Levy, University of Akron
This study investigated the relationships among procedural justice (PJ), perceived
system knowledge (PSK), and Beliefs about OCBs, and their relationships with OCBs. Results
extended previous research to show that the effect of PJ on OCBs is not simple, but rather
interacts with both system knowledge and OCB Beliefs to affect exhibition of OCBs.
32-22
Examining Self-Appraisal Formality and Expectations on Appraisal
Reactions
Lisa Keeping, University of Akron
Paul E. Levy, University of Akron
Douglas J. Brown, University of Akron
Employees who were asked to formally self-appraise were compared to those who
informally engaged in self-appraisal. Results indicated that those who formally
self-appraised expressed more positive appraisal reactions than informal self-appraisers,
but these effects were attenuated when employees did not expect their self-ratings to be
considered by their managers.
32-23
360-Degree Feedback Ratings: Effects of Method of Rater Selection
Kim Stepanski, Wayne State University
Sebastiano A. Fisicaro, Wayne State University
Five types of raters provided feedback ratings to managers. Ratees selected client
raters in 1996 and 1997; ratees selected peer and subordinate raters in 1996, but not
1997. Self, supervisor, and client ratings did not vary from 1996 to 1997; however, peer
and subordinate ratings were higher for 1996 than 1997.
32-24
Differential Comparsion Standards and Subjective
Occupational Effects on Performace Ratings
Jamie Kieffer, Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center
Brian W. Schrader, Emporia State University
Examined the effects of six differential comparison standards on the level of
inter-rater agreement between self- and supervisory performance ratings within the context
of a subjectively evaluated occupation. Results indicated differential comparison
standards did cause inter-rater agreement to change when evaluating occupations that rely
on subjective criteria.
32-25
Motivated Reasoning and Bias Correction in Performance Appraisal:
A Test Involving Mixed Rating Motives
James M. Wilkerson, Georgia Institute of Technology
Christina E. Shalley, Georgia Institute of Technology
This research addresses how motivated reasoning and bias correction impact performance
appraisal accuracy and leniency. Ninety-one participants rated an instructors
performance under variable strengths of pitted rating goals. Support for the notion of
accuracy goals enhancing biased reasoning was found, as well as some support for bias
correction hypotheses.
32-26
A Comparison of Missing Data Techniques in Small Samples
Daniel P. Russell, American Institutes for Research/Aon Consulting
The present study examines many of the techniques currently used to deal with missing
data. Those considered here are: listwise deletion, pairwise deletion, mean imputation,
hot deck imputation, regression imputation, and maximum likelihood estimation via the EM
algorithm. Factors affecting the estimation of missing data are examined and discussed.
32-27
The Effects of Similarity and Attributions on Performance Appraisal
Kerry A. Delbridge, Michigan State University
Richard P. DeShon, Michigan State University
This study examined the effect of rater-ratee similarity on performance appraisal,
mediated by rater attributions. Results indicated the use of actual similarity alone was
problematic whereas a model incorporating perceived similarity and liking better fit the
data. The mediating effects of attributions allow a better understanding of the underlying
processes.
32-28
Relative Influence of Direct and Indirect Observations on Performance
Ratings
Timothy D. Golden, University of Connecticut
Janet L. Barnes-Farrell, University of Connecticut
Increasingly supervisors are forced to rely upon indirect performance information when
constructing ratings. This study investigates the relative contribution of directly and
indirectly observed performance to evaluations of the overall performance of workers.
Results reveal a bias in the direction of information observed directly, regardless of the
level of performance.
32-29
Can Accountability Assure the Accuracy of Upward Appraisals?
Denise Haeggberg, The Ohio University
Peter Y. Chen, The Ohio University
Scott Finlinson, The Ohio University
Rowland P. Hanley, The Ohio University
Observational and rating accuracy of upward appraisal under the conditions of
accountability and expected future interaction was investigated utilizing a team decision
simulation. Anonymous team members were more accurate on observational accuracy indexes
but made more errors on rating accuracy indexes than accountable team members.
32-30
A Re-Examination of Schriesheim and Hinkins (1990)
Measure of Upward Influence
Wayne A. Hochwarter, University of Alabama
Allison W. Harrison, Mississippi State University
Gerald R. Ferris, University of Illinois
Pamela L. Perrew, Florida State University
David A. Ralston, University of Connecticut
This article reexamines a taxonomy originally presented by Kipnis, et al. (1980) and
modified by Schriesheim and Hinkin (1990). We assess the factor
structure, convergent, and discriminant validity of the 18-item, six-factor measure.
Although concerns regarding lower than acceptable reliability estimates and item cross
loadings surface, overall findings generally support the validity of the measure.
32-31
Sample Size Required for Adverse Impact Analysis
Scott B. Morris, Illinois Institute of Technology
Describes a method for computing the minimum sample size needed to test for adverse
impact with adequate statistical power. The required sample size is often extremely large,
particularly when the overall selection rate and the proportion of minority applicants are
small.
32-32
Rater-Ratee Race Effects on Performance Ratings
for Understudied Ethnic Groups
Kathleen Tuzinski, University of Minnesota
Deniz S. Ones, University of Minnesota
Previous research on race effects in performance ratings have examined Black-White
differences. We explore whether Black results generalize to Asians and Hispanics. 44,925
managers were rated by 231,350 supervisors, peers, and subordinates. Hispanic results
approximated Black results; differences were found for Asians. Researchers must be
cautious generalizing Black and Hispanic research findings to Asians.
32-33
Evaluating Gender Biases on Actual Job Performance of Real People
Chieh-Chen Bowen, Cleveland State University
This study examines gender biases on job performance in work settings where confounding
variables were cautiously taken into consideration to ensure fair comparisons. Overall, we
found very little evidence of gender bias in performance appraisals. However, individual
moderators, such as measure-specific gender stereotypicality and raters gender
showed significant gender bias in performance appraisals.
32-34
Gender and Ethnicity-Based Differential Item Functioning
on the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery
Shanan Gibson, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Robert J. Harvey, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Item Response Theory methodologies were used to examine the potential for scale-level
bias on multiple versions of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. Although
substantial levels of differential item functioning were found, results at the scale level
were mixed, with some tests favoring the majority and some the minority group.
32-35
Social Power in Teams: The Effects on Peer Rating Behavior
Stacy E. McManus, University of Tennessee
Joyce E. A. Russell, University of Tennessee
Robert T. Ladd, University of TennesseeKnoxville
This paper investigated the effects of social power on peer rating behavior. Dominance
analysis results indicate that individuals with coercive power generally gave performance
appraisal ratings with less halo and leniency, but greater discrimination between
teammates performance. Referent power was related to greater halo and leniency, and
less discriminability.
32-36
Comparing Explicit and Implicit Measures of
the Importance of Performance Dimensions
Caroline Cochran, Personnel Decisions Research Institutes
Kenneth T. Bruskiewicz, Personnel Decisions Research Institutes
Jeff W. Johnson, Personnel Decisions Research Institutes
This paper compared explicit and implicit measures of the importance of individual
performance dimensions to ratings of overall performance and advancement potential. The
results suggest that raters may actually be more aware of how individual dimensions of
performance relate to overall job performance than previously thought.
32-37
A Computer-Mediated Assessment of the Stepladder Technique
Lori L. Foster, University of South Florida
Michael D. Coovert, University of South Florida
An established technique for improving face-to-face team decision quality was extended
to computer-mediated teams. Results revealed partial support for the use of the stepladder
technique across different communication media. Patterns and perceptions of team member
influence and team member satisfaction were also examined.
32-38
Social Network Analysis in Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Michael J. Howard, Pennsylvania State University
Social network analysis examines relationships between individuals. Despite the
importance of maintaining relationships to many of todays jobs, I-O psychologists
have typically overlooked the social network perspective. This paper presents a brief
overview of network analysis and illustrates its potential application to I-O psychology
using data from a psychology department.
32-39
Feedback Cue and Sign: Effects on Performance, Cognition, and Affect
Neta Moye, University of Maryland
Jennifer E. Joseph, University of Maryland
Kathryn M. Bartol, University of Maryland
This study investigated the impact of two feedback characteristics, cue (task-oriented
or ego-oriented) and sign (positive or negative). Negative feedback resulted in higher
negative self-reactions and output, but more mistakes. Interactions between negative sign
and ego-orientation led to lower levels of performance evaluation concern, supervisor
satisfaction, and interactional justice perceptions.
32-40
Metatraits: Enhancing Criterion-Related Validity
Through the Assessment of Traitedness
Stephen A. Dwight, Aon Consulting
Paige Porter Wolf, Aon Consulting
John H. Golden, III, Aon Consulting
It has been hypothesized that taking into consideration the relevance of a trait (i.e.,
traitedness) for a person would enhance predictions about trait behaviors. Consistent with
this hypothesis, traitedness moderated the relationship between personality and an
objective criterion and provided incremental validity, above personality, for a subjective
criterion.
32-41
Clarifying Constructs: Affect and the Five-Factor Model of Personality
James M. LeBreton, University of TennesseeKnoxville
D. Lawrence LeBreton, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
John Deville, Illinois State University
Hypotheses relating affect and the five-factor model of personality were extracted from
the literature. Models were tested using confirmatory factor analysis and path analysis. A
hierarchical model with the source traits of positive and negative affect causing the
five-factor model had the best fit to the data.
32-42
Institutional Review of Research Conducted in Work Organizations
Bradford S. Bell, Michigan State University
Daniel R. Ilgen, Michigan State University
This research compared the reactions of Human Subjects Review Board members to typical
test validation studies to the reactions of human resource managers, job applicants, and
university faculty members. Overall, review board members were more stringent on consent
procedures and less sensitive to the demands of work settings.
33. Special Event: Friday, 1:30 - 2:50 Imperial A
Developing Organizational Fitness: Toward a Theory
and Practice of Organizational Alignment
We have known for 40 years that organizations achieve high performance through a tight
fit between business strategy, organizational arrangements, culture and leadership. Yet,
theory and practice for developing fit lag far behind. Professor Beer will discuss a
theory and method for achieving fitness that has emerged from his research and practice in
change.
Benjamin Schneider, University of Maryland, Chair
Michael Beer, Harvard Graduate School of Business, Presenter
34. Practitioner Forum: Friday, 1:30 - 2:50 Marquis III
Relating Employee and Customer Opinions: Drilling Into the Dynamics
To say employee and customer opinions are linked is no longer news. This forum
addresses narrowing the focus of what employee issues are most related, how they combine
to predict customer satisfaction, and understanding the conditions where relationships are
strongest. New attention is given to understanding the customer criterion.
Jack W. Wiley, Gantz Wiley Research, Chair
Robert J. Vance, Pennsylvania State University, Scott M. Brooks, Gantz Wiley
Research, Paul Tesluk, Tulane University, Effects of Climate for Change on Work Unit
Customer Service
Joerg Dietz, Tulane University, Jack W. Wiley, Gantz Wiley Research, Serving
Employees in Service Organizations: Effects of an Organizational Climate for Employee
Well-Being on Customer Satisfaction
Scott M. Brooks, Gantz Wiley Research, Terrence Guth, Payless Shoe Source, When
Service Support Means More: Its Impact on Customer Opinions Across Work Environments
Stephanie D. Kendall, Gantz Wiley Research, Carmen Barker Lemay, Gantz Wiley
Research, When Does Service Matter? Linking Employee Service Emphasis to Customer
Satisfaction within Heavy, Lapsed, and Light Customer Segments
35. Symposium: Friday, 1:30 - 2:50 Marquis IV
Learning to Fail or Failing to Learn? The Role of Errors,
Failures, and Feedback in Learning Environments
Traditionally errors, failures, and negative feedback are construed as inhibitory to
learning. Recently, however, researchers have suggested that failures may be beneficial
and even necessary for learning. This symposium comprises some of the most recent research
on the role of negative information in learning environments.
Stanley M. Gully, Rutgers University, Co-Chair
Steve W. J. Kozlowski, Michigan State University, Co-Chair
Rebecca J. Toney, Michigan State University, Steve W. J. Kozlowski, Michigan
State University, Shifting Feedback from Positive to Negative: Benefits of
Evaluative Feedback on Learning and Training Performance
Shelda Debowski, Murdoch University, Robert Wood, University of New South
Wales, The Role of Errors in Electronic Search Skill Development
Doerte Heimbeck, University of Amsterdam, Michael Frese, University of
Amsterdam, Error Training and the Role of Goal Orientation
Stanley M. Gully, Rutgers University, Stephanie C. Payne, George Mason
University, K. Lee Kiechel, George Mason University, Jon-Andrew Whiteman, Human
Technology, Inc., Affective Reactions and Performance Outcomes of Error-Based
Training
Michael Frese, University of Amsterdam, Discussant
36. Symposium: Friday, 1:30 - 2:50 Madrid/Trinidad
Current Issues in Organizational Socialization Research
Organizational socialization is a complex process influenced by the newcomer,
organizational insiders, and the context in which it occurs. The aim of socialization
research is to understand how each influence contributes to newcomer adjustment. This
symposium highlights contemporary conceptual and measurement issues important to enhancing
our understanding of newcomer socialization.
Debra A. Major, Old Dominion University, Chair
Jessica M. Sterling, University at Albany, SUNY, Kevin J. Williams, University
at Albany, SUNY, Newcomer Socialization: The Impact of Goal Orientation,
Self-Efficacy, and Desire for Control on Proactive Behaviors
Debra A. Major, Old Dominion University, Jonathan E. Turner, Old Dominion
University, Victoria Cole, Old Dominion University, The Role of Supervisors in
Newcomer Organizational Socialization
Jerel E. Slaughter, Bowling Green State University, Michael Zickar, Bowling
Green State University, Climates for Socialization and Effective Career-Entry
Facilitation Activities
David Chan, National University of Singapore, Understanding Newcomer
Adaptation: A Unified Data Analytic Approach
Talya N. Bauer, Portland State University, Discussant
37. Symposium: Friday, 1:30 - 2:50 Consulate
Coaching Interviewees for Structured Employment Interviews:
Scientific and Practical Perspectives
Research on coaching for employment interviews is scarce. What is coaching, how is it
done, and what effects does it have? What processes and constructs underlie these effects?
This symposium will address both practical and scientific perspectives on coaching for
interview performance (both situational and structured experience-based interviews).
Todd J. Maurer, Georgia Institute of Technology, Chair
Jerry M. Solamon, City of Atlanta, Developing Structured Interview
Tutorial Programs for Public Safety Promotional Candidates
Todd J. Maurer, Georgia Institute of Technology, Jerry M. Solamon, City of
Atlanta, Deborah Troxtel, City of Atlanta, Kimberly Andrews, Georgia Institute of
Technology, Coaching and Situational Employment Interviews
Stuart A. Tross, Towers Perrin/Georgia Institute of Technology, Todd J. Maurer,
Georgia Institute of Technology, Effect of Interviewee Coaching on Structured
Experience-Based Interview Processes and Outcomes
Michael A. Campion, Purdue University, Discussant
38. Roundtable: Friday, 1:30 - 2:50 Sydney
Distance Graduate Programs in I-O Psychology: Challenges and
Solutions
I-O psychology graduate training is highly valued by employers. Many who could benefit
from this training, however, are unable to pursue an I-O degree because of career and
geographical barriers. One solution to this problem is distance learning. This roundtable
examines the opportunities and challenges of distance I-O graduate programs.
Patrick A. Knight, Kansas State University, Co-Host
Clive Fullagar, Kansas State University, Co-Host
39. Symposium: Friday, 1:30 - 2:50 Intl Salon C
Cross-Cultural Research in Industrial and Organizational Psychology
American organizations are operating in a global environment. Thus, it is critical that
industrial and organizational psychologists develop a better understanding of
cross-cultural issues. Consequently, this symposium presents the results of theoretical
and empirical research on cross-cultural issues in leadership, time orientation, attitudes
toward work and family, and negotiation strategies.
Eugene F. Stone-Romero, University at Albany, SUNY, Chair
George B. Graen, University of Southwestern Louisiana, Chen Hui, Hong Kong
University of Science and Technology, Cross-Cultural Leadership
Dirk D. Steiner, Universit de NiceSophia Antipolis, Jeffrey M. Conte,
San Diego State University, Sylvie Guirard, Universit de NiceSophia Antipolis, Independent
Development Versus Translation of the French Time Orientation Scale
Mary Gowan, University of Central Florida, Melanie Trevino, University of Texas
at El Paso, A Comparative Analysis of Mexican National and Anglo-American Attitudes
Toward Work and Family
Dianna L. Stone, University of Central Florida, Stephanie Newell, Eastern
Michigan University, Dimitri Lyakhovitzky, University at Albany, SUNY, Eugene F.
Stone-Romero, University at Albany, SUNY, A Comparison of Eastern European and North
American Managers Negotiation Strategies.
Eugene F. Stone-Romero, University at Albany, SUNY, Discussant
40. Practitioner Forum: Friday, 1:30 - 2:50 Intl Salon F
An Integrated, Global HR System: Competency Profiles,
Development, Deployment, Compensation
This practitioner forum describes the four components of an integrated, global human
resources system utilizing competencies as its foundation. We will discuss how each piece
of the system was developed, rolled out to the organization, and the results after 2 years
of implementation. Audience discussion will be encouraged.
Irene A. Sasaki, Dow Chemical Company, Competency Profiles: The Foundation
Steven W. Constantin, Dow Chemical Company, Employee Development Aligned
to Competency Profiles
Kenneth R. Pederson, Dow Chemical Company, A Global Company = Global
Career Opportunities
Steven J. Robison, Dow Chemical Company, Compensation: Supporting and
Aligned With Other HR Processes
43. Symposium: Friday, 1:30 - 2:50 Intl Salon G
Advances in Multilevel Research: New Techniques and Methodological
Issues
Multilevel research is becoming increasingly important in many areas of the I-O
psychology literature. Each of the papers in this symposium takes a different angle in
addressing the methodological issues surrounding the aggregation of individual-level data
to represent group-level phenomena.
Shannon L. Palmer, University of Maryland, Co-Chair
George Ziets, University of Maryland, Co-Chair
Paul D. Bliese, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Using Resampling
and Monte Carlo Simulation in Multilevel Research
Katherine J. Klein, University of Maryland, Shannon L. Palmer, University of
Maryland, George Ziets, University of Maryland, Paul J. Hanges, University of Maryland, The
Effects of Response Bias in Multilevel Research
Paul J. Hanges, University of Maryland, Naomi G. Dyer, University of Maryland,
William P. Sipe, University of Maryland, Multilevel Confirmatory Factor Analysis:
Demonstration of Muthens Technique
Katherine J. Klein, University of Maryland, Amy Buhl Conn, University of
Maryland, Brent Smith, Cornell University, Joann Speer Sorra, University of Maryland, An
Exploration of Within-Group Agreement in Survey Responses
Fred E. Dansereau, SUNYBuffalo, Discussant
44. Roundtable: Friday, 1:30 - 2:50 Sydney
Making Employment Relationships Work in the 21st Century
Psychological and real contracts between employees and employers have changed
significantly. In many organizations, these changes have catapulted the workforce into a
state of uncertainty that is negatively affecting productivity and satisfaction. This
session will provide a framework for redefining employment relationships and will explore
strategies for managing these changes.
Karen E. May, Terranova Consulting Group, Co-Host
Katharine M. Jung, University of CaliforniaBerkeley/Terranova Consulting
Group, Co-Host
45. Special Event: Friday, 2:00 - 2:50 Intl Salon A
1998 Distinguished Professional Contributions Award Winner
The Value of Journals for Informed Practice
Kurt Lewins dictum that there is nothing so practical as a good theory is the
underlying theme of this presentation. The primary focus will be four-fold, namely
research on selection, performance appraisal, training, and motivation. The role of being
knowledgeable on prior research will be discussed in the (a) development of behavioral
observation scales as dependent variables against which to evaluate interventions and
validate predictors, (b) the application of goal setting to the training and motivation of
such diverse populations as loggers and scientists, and (c) the development of the
situational interview to predict who will do well in a given organizational setting.
Edwin A. Locke, University of Maryland, Chair
Gary P. Latham, University of Toronto, Presenter
Coffee Break: Friday, 3:00 - 3:30 South Hall/North Foyer
46. Special Event: Friday, 3:30 - 4:20 Imperial A
1998 Distinguished Scientific Contributions Award Winner
Leadership and Decision Making Revisited
It has been a quarter of a century since the publication of the Vroom-Yetton model.
Since then there have been over 100 scientific articles and doctoral dissertations devoted
to either normative or descriptive aspects of participation in decision making. Professor
Vroom will describe the major learnings from that research along with the latest
formulation of the model.
Lyman W. Porter, University of California, Irvine, Chair
Victor H. Vroom, Yale University, Presenter
47. Symposium: Friday, 3:30 - 4:50 Marquis III
Subgroup Differences in Employment Testing
It is well known that cognitive ability tests demonstrate subgroup differences. This
symposium will examine potential determinants of subgroup differences in cognitive ability
tests. In addition, research on subgroup differences will be extended to the domains of
assessment center exercises and personality measures. Implications for practitioners will
be discussed.
Brent Smith, Cornell University, Co-Chair
Michael W. Grojean, University of Maryland, Co-Chair
Aleks Ellis, Michigan State University, Ann Marie Ryan, Michigan State
University, Racial Differences in the Use of Test-Taking Strategies
Michael W. Grojean, University of Maryland, Paul J. Hanges, University of
Maryland, Adverse Impact in Cognitive Ability Tests: The Role of Values and
Test-Taking Attitudes
Harold W. Goldstein, Baruch College, CUNY, Yoneko Riley, Baruch College, CUNY,
Kenneth P. Yusko, Arlington County Department of Personnel, Exploration of
Black-White Subgroup Differences on Interpersonal Constructs
Kimberly R. Brinkmeyer, CDR Assessment Group, Brent Smith, Cornell University, An
Examination of Subgroup Differences in Personality Measurement: Race and Gender
Measurement Equivalence
Neal W. Schmitt, Michigan State University, Discussant
48. Practitioner Forum: Friday, 3:30 - 4:50 Marquis IV
Beyond Linking Employee, Customer, and Business
Measures: Working the Results
Thanks in part to the visibility of work at Sears, the linking of employee opinions,
customer opinions, and business performance has become a feature of many survey programs.
Because developing an elegant, sound model is not enough, these presenters describe how
they put "linkage research" to work in their organizations.
Scott M. Brooks, Gantz Wiley Research, Chair
Jack W. Wiley, Gantz Wiley Research, Bruce H. Campbell, Gantz Wiley Research, From
Linkage Research and Best Practices Analysis to Action Planning: A Case Study
Sally F. Hartmann, Sears, Transformation at Sears: Putting the Linkage
Model to Work
Terry Guth, Payless Shoe Source, Putting Linkage Results to Work: A
Description of One Organizations Follow-Up Strategy
Sherilyn M. Kam, Kaiser Permanente Hawaii, Fran Sincere, Kaiser Permanente,
Robert A. Jako, Kaiser Permanente, The Use of Linkage Research Findings in a Health
Care Organization
49. Practitioner Forum: Friday, 3:30 - 4:20 Copenhagen
Using Competencies as the Basis for Integrating Human Resource
Systems
Aligning I-O psychology practice with theory and research is often challenging. One
practice area where this challenge has become evident is job definition. This session
addresses questions about competency-based systems. Is competency methodology valid, or
are we shortcoming a more rigorous process at a cost that is too high?
Sharon Wagner, Golden Gate University, Chair
Jill L. Geehr, CSX Transportation, Transportation, Building Towards
Integrated Human Resource Policies and Procedures
Karin S. Fulton, Humana, Inc., Integrating Competencies into Human
Resource Systems and Processes
Mila N. Baker, Baptist/St. Vincents Health Systems, The Use of
Competency Models in Team-Based Organizations
Charley C. Morrow, Linkage, Inc., Management and Compensation Using
Competency Models: New Methods, Old Problems
50. Symposium: Friday, 3:30 - 4:50 Madrid/Trinidad
Work Team Effectiveness: Recent Studies of Context & Composition
Research and practice concerning work team effectiveness continue to emphasize context
factors, and the way members conduct external interactionsalong with composition or
mix of member characteristics. This international symposium presents four empirical
studies of work teams focused on context or composition, from varied perspectives in
diverse contexts.
Eric Sundstrom, University of Tennessee, Chair
Janice Langan-Fox, University of Melbourne, Sharon Code, University of
Melbourne, Lillian T. Eby, University of Georgia, Kim Langfield-Smith, LaTrobe, Teams,
Managers and Experts in Context: Unstructured-Structured Tasks, Task Difficulty and
Strategies
Frederick P. Morgeson, Texas A&M University, Incorporating Context
into Team Research: An Exemplar from the Field
Terry Halfhill, University of Tennessee, Adam D. Weilbaecher, University of
Tulsa, Eric Sundstrom, University of Tennessee, Personality Predictors of
Performance in Military Teams: Agreeableness and Conscientiousness
Susan Mohammed, Pennsylvania State University, Linda Angell, Pennsylvania State
University, Ronald Johnson, Pennsylvania State University, Erika Ringseis, Pennsylvania
State University, Group Composition and Group Performance in an Academic Setting.
Richard Moreland, University of Pittsburgh, Discussant
51. Symposium: Friday, 3:30 - 4:50 Consulate
Recent Issues and Innovations in Personality Assessment
A variety of methods are available to assess personality; however, most of these
methods translate into nothing more than basic self-reports of "normal"
personality. This symposium introduces two alternative measurement systems available to
assess personality, as well as issues associated with assessing the "dark side"
of normal personality.
James M. LeBreton, University of TennesseeKnoxville, Co-Chair
John F. Binning, Illinois State University, Co-Chair
John F. Binning, Illinois State University, James M. LeBreton, University of
TennesseeKnoxville, Anthony J. Adorno, The DeGarmo Group, A Research Agenda
for Assessing Personality in the Employment Interview
D. Lawrence LeBreton, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,
Sigrid B. Gustafson, American Institutes for Research, ADA Implications of Measuring
Personality
Debrah Z. Migetz, University of TennesseeKnoxville, Lawrence R. James,
University of TennesseeKnoxville, Current and New Directions in Conditional
Reasoning Measurement
William R. Walton, University of Tennessee Knoxville, Identification
and Characterization of Antisocial Personality Disorder
Lois E. Tetrick, University of Houston, Discussant
52. Roundtable: Friday, 3:30 - 4:20 Sydney
The Future Organization: Telework, Intelligent Agents,
and Nomadic Computing
Organizations and their workers continue to be impacted by technological evolution.
This roundtable describes three developments having the greatest influence: Telework,
intelligent (software) agents, and nomadic (mobile) computing. Our focus is on considering
these forces, and in facilitating the efforts to manage their influence on workers and in
organizations.
Michael D. Coovert, University of South Florida, Co-Host
Lori L. Foster, University of South Florida, Co-Host
J. Philip Craiger, University of NebraskaOmaha, Co-Host
R. Jason Weiss, University of NebraskaOmaha, Co-Host
53. Special Event: Friday, 3:30 - 5:20 Intl Salon A
SIOP/EAWOP Symposium: International Perspectives in Selection Research
European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology (EAWOP) is the equivalent of
SIOP in Europe. In this joint EAWOP-SIOP symposium, participants from both sides of the
Atlantic will address issues in personnel selection. A particular focus of the session
will be personality measures used in personnel selection and placement.
Neil Anderson, University of London, Chair
Robert Roe, Tilberg University, Selection in the New Millennium: A
European View on Development in Methods and Research
Neil Anderson, University of London, Deniz Ones, University of Minnesota, Gender
and Ethnic Group Differences on Personality Scales: Some Data from the UK
Ivan Robertson, Manchester School of Management, Sharon Clarke, Manchester
School of Management, Personality and Accident Involvement: Implications for
Personnel Selection
Jesus Salgado, University of Santiago de Compostela, Silvia Moscoso, University
of Santiago de Compostela, Construct Validity of Two Personality Inventories Based
on the Five Factor Model: A Spanish Investigation
Chockalingham Viswesvaran, Florida International University, Deniz Ones,
University of Minnesota, Do Individuals Gravitate to Jobs Commensurate with Their
Personality: Data from Jobs in the U.S.
54. Symposium: Friday, 3:30 - 4:50 Intl Salon B
Personality and Performance: Boundary Conditions
for Measurement and Structural Models
This symposium contains four papers that, as a set, address the question, under what
conditions do (and dont) measures of personality correlate with measures of
performance? This question is addressed through treatment of topics such as
self-regulatory mediators, cross-cultural differences, differences across rating sources,
and contextual influences.
Walter C. Borman, University of South Florida/Personnel Decisions Research Institutes, Chair
Wendy J. Casper, George Mason University, Gilad Chen, George Mason University,
Jos M. Cortina, George Mason University, Meta-Analytic Examination of the
Relationships Among Cognitive Ability, Conscientiousness, Self-Efficacy, and Task
Performance
Judith M. Collins, Michigan State University, Paul R. Bly, Texas A&M
University, David J. Woehr, Texas A&M University, The Incremental Validity of
the Socialization Trait over the Socialization Process for the Prediction of Task and
Contextual Performance
Stacy L. Jackson, Washington University, St. Louis, Performance Through
the Eyes of Those Who See You Less: The Credibility of Others Assessments
Mark J. Schmit, Personnel Decisions International, Jenifer A. Kihm, Personnel
Decisions International, Chet Robie, University of Houston, Refining a Personality
Test to be Used in Selection Across Several Cultures
Frank L. Schmidt, University of Iowa, Discussant
55. Special Event: Friday, 3:30 - 5:20 Intl Salon C
A Beginners Manual: Keys to Success in Practice
This panel will seek to unlock the secrets for achieving success as an I-O psychologist
in the applied setting. Drawing on a range of experience and perspectives, the panel will
discuss how to best prepare for careers in a variety of business settings, recount the
pitfalls to avoid and offer helpful tips for succeeding.
John C. Scott, Applied Psychological Techniques, Chair
Robert T. Hogan, Hogan Assessment Systems, Panelist
James L. Outtz, Outtz and Associates, Panelist
Ben E. Dowell, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Panelist
Jeffrey J. McHenry, Microsoft Corporation, Panelist
Gordon J. Curphy, Personnel Decisions International, Panelist
56. Master Tutorial: Friday, 3:30 - 4:50 Intl Salon D
Adult Intelligence and Work from Knowledge and Trait-Complex
Perspectives
This master tutorial will review the state of the science and practice of intellectual
assessment, and discuss new ways of assessing adult intelligence that may substantially
improve the accuracy and efficiency of applications for selection, training and
classification. Over 90 years has passed since the introduction of the modern intelligence
test for children and adolescents. Extension of the Binet-Simon methods to occupational
and vocational testing started in earnest in the 1910s. However, at various times during
this century, researchers have recognized that the received view of child intelligence is
inadequate for characterizing adult intellect in general, and intellect in the workplace
in particular.
Simcha Ronen, Tel Aviv University, Chair
Phillip L. Ackerman, Georgia Institute of Technology, Presenter
57. Special Event: Friday, 3:30 - 4:20 Intl Salon E
Ad Hoc Committee on Ethnic Minority Participation
The hosts of this session along with task force leaders will provide an overview of
19981999 developments for the Ad Hoc Committee on Ethnic Minority Affairs. Following
this brief presentation, participants will be asked to help set agenda items for the
coming year. All minority and non-minority conference participants interested in ethnic
minority issues are encouraged to attend. A reception will follow.
Beth Chung, Cornell University, Co-Chair
Dana McDonald-Mann, Center for Creative Leadership, Co-Chair
58. Practitioner Forum: Friday, 3:30 - 4:20 Intl Salon G
Developing an Ethical Organization: The U.S. Armys Example
The United States Army developed an Ethical Climate Assessment Survey (ECAS) that can
be used by leaders to assess, and improve, the ethical climate of their organizations. In
conjunction with a comprehensive leader training program, this survey provides an
excellent example for any organization desiring to maintain a healthy ethical climate.
Joe LeBoeuf, U.S. Military Academy, West Point, Chair
Gregory J. Dardis, U.S. Military Academy, West Point, Developing Leaders
of Character
Kenneth A. Romaine, U.S. Military Academy, West Point, Assessing Ethical
Climates: A Practical Tool
John W. Bressler, U.S. Army Headquarters, Using the Ethical Climate
Assessment Survey: Some Evidence of Success
59. Symposium: Friday, 3:30 - 4:50 Intl Salon H
Technology Impacts on Impression Formation: Looking Inside the Black Box
Impression formation typically occurs through interpersonal interactions. Electronic
communication technologies, such as computer conferences and videoconferences, are
changing both opportunities to interact with others and the nature of those interactions.
We present empirical findings about how communication technologies and contextual factors
affect interpersonal impressions across a variety of organizational contexts.
Susan G. Straus, Carnegie Mellon University, Chair
Suzanne P. Weisband, University of Arizona, Jonathan Woodard, University of
Arizona, Perceptions of Leaders at a Distance
Joseph B. Walther, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Is a Picture Worth a
Thousand Words?
Pamela Hinds, Stanford University, Impressions of Members in Distributed
Work Groups: The Relative Effects of Geographical, Informational, and Functional Distance
Susan G. Straus, Carnegie Mellon University, Laurie L. Levesque, Carnegie
Mellon University, Effects of Communication Media and Nonverbal Cues on Judgments in
Job Interviews
K. Michele Kacmar, Florida State University, Discussant
60. Poster Session: Friday, 3:30 - 5:20 Intl Hall South Foyer
Groups, Intergroup Conflict, Leadership, and Organizational Change
60-1
1998 Robert J. Wherry Award for Best Paper at the IO-OB Conference
Team Derailment: An Initial Examination
Dana M. Milanovich, Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems
Division
Elizabeth J. Muniz, Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division
Eduardo Salas, Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division
Janis A. Cannon-Bowers, Naval Air Warfare Training Systems Division
This paper describes a preliminary attempt to understand the teamwork deficiencies that
contribute to team derailment. To study this phenomenon, we used the team competency
framework offered by Cannon-Bowers, Tannenbaum, Salas, and Volpe (1995). This aided us in
identifying the team skills and attitudes associated with team failures.
60-2
1998 S. Rains Wallace Dissertation Award
An Investigation of Work Group Management and Performance Barriers
Paul Tesluk, Tulane University
Using data from 88 road crews, this study investigated how groups manage performance
barriers. Although performance constraints were negatively related to performance, crews
that used problem management strategies minimized these effects directly and indirectly by
maintaining cohesion under adverse conditions. Factors related to use of problem
management strategies are discussed.
60-3
Person-Group Fit: Assessing the Interaction of Personality and Ability
Karen J. Jansen, Texas A&M University
This study investigates the effect of similar and diverse personality and KSAs on group
performance and satisfaction by developing a typology of four types of person-group fit.
Results suggest that the nature of the groups task and required interaction
determine the type of fit that will maximize performance and satisfaction.
60-4
An Examination of Ethnoracial Differences in Leader Prototypes
Michelle A. Marks, Florida International University
Annie A. Nguyen, Florida International University
Jennifer Kantrowitz, Florida International University
This study examines business, military, and religious leader prototypes for both White
and Hispanic Americans. A sample of 91 Hispanics and 62 Whites rated Lord, Foti & De
Vaders (1984) leader traits for their representativeness of typical leaders.
Findings indicate significant differences in leader prototype profiles between ethnoracial
subgroups.
60-5
Performance Implications of Leadership and Training for
Team Adaptation to Novel Environments
Michelle A. Marks, Florida International University
Stephen J. Zaccaro, George Mason University
John E. Mathieu, Pennsylvania State University
We examined how leader briefings and team interaction training influence team
members knowledge structures concerning processes related to effective team
performance. Findings indicated that leader communication of environment knowledge and
team interaction training affected the development of team mental models, which influenced
team communication and coordinated performance in routine and novel environments.
60-6
Sailing Crews and Measures of Team Process
Thomas R. Gordon, University of South Florida
Michael T. Brannick, University of South Florida
We compared measures of team process and outcome in sailing crews. Communication,
assertiveness, and team viability measures were compared with order of finish in regattas.
Multitrait-multimethod analysis showed that skippers and crewmembers converged on the team
process measures and successfully discriminated between communication and assertiveness.
Communication, assertiveness, and viability scores predicted order of finish across crews.
60-7
Relations Between Leadership, Potency, Group Processes,
and Work Group Effectiveness
Glenn E. Littlepage, Middle Tennessee State University
Steven D. Jones, Middle Tennessee State University
Richard Moffett, Middle Tennessee State University
Tressa Cherry, Middle Tennessee State University
Susan Senovich, Middle Tennessee State University
Members of 112 teams in an aerospace organization completed questionnaires assessing
team potency, group processes, leadership, and group performance. Results of causal
modeling suggest that leadership affects team potency and group processes, potency affects
group processes and group performance, and group processes affect group performance.
60-8
Development and Validation of an Organizational
Learning Assessment Instrument
Nancy Da Silva, University of Houston
Lois E. Tetrick, University of Houston
Allan P. Jones, University of Houston
Kelley J. Slack, University of Houston
Jean K. Latting, University of Houston
Mary H. Beck, University of Houston
The organizational learning assessment instrument was designed in this study generally
supported the dimensions of systems thinking, shared vision, team learning, mental models,
and personal mastery. Evidence of construct validity was presented based on hypothesized
correlates of the dimensions and their ability to predict personal and group innovation.
60-9
Individual and Group Innovation in Perceived Group Effectiveness
Kelley J. Slack, University of Houston
Allan P. Jones, University of Houston
Lois E. Tetrick, University of Houston
Nancy Da Silva, University of Houston
Jean K. Latting, University of Houston
Mary H. Beck, University of Houston
Interest in improving the effectiveness of work groups has increased (Campion, Medsker,
& Higgs, 1993). The present study examined the role of individual and group innovation
on group effectiveness. Support for learning and innovation were both directly and
indirectly related to group effectiveness, through empowerment, individual innovation, and
group innovation.
60-10
Perceived Similarity, Power, and Leader-Member Interaction
Joellyn Townsend, University of Houston
Allan P. Jones, University of Houston
This study explored linkages between leader-member similarity and interaction patterns.
Similarity ratings were related to the perceived use of supervisory power and to the use
of the supervisor as a source of work direction. Finally, similarity was related to
employee and supervisor ratings of interaction frequency and LMX.
60-11
Citizenship Behavior at the Team Level of Analysis
Craig L. Pearce, University of Maryland
Pamela A. Herbik, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
We examined 71 teams in this research. Results indicate that team leadership, team
dynamics, and the teams environment, but not team demography, are highly correlated
with team citizenship behavior (TCB). Hierarchical multiple regression results suggest
that team leadership accounts for more unique variance in TCB, than do the other
variables.
60-12
Effects of Social Cues and Opponent Gender on Performance Expectancies
Bryan Edwards, University of South Alabama
Many factors tend to affect self-efficacy of performance on an academic task, which
invariably affects subsequent performance. The influence of two factors, social cues and
perceived typed of opponent, on performance expectancies in a competitive situation appear
to affect self-efficacy of males and females in the presence of a competitor.
60-13
Team Leader Behaviors and Member Satisfaction:
The Role of Procedural Justice
Mary Anne Hyland, Rutgers University
Elizabeth A. Douthitt, Rutgers University
Jean Phillips, Rutgers University
Procedural justice research has shown that team processes and leader interactions
influence procedural justice perceptions, and procedural justice affects team member
reactions. Partial support was found for the mediating effects of procedural justice
perceptions on the relation of team leader consideration and team member influence with
satisfaction.
60-14
Effects of Quality Circles on Performance and
Employee Attitudes: A Meta-Analysis
Gloria Pereira, Aon Consulting
Hobart G. Osburn, University of Houston
This study explores the relationship between quality circles (QCs) and employee
attitudes and productivity. The sample included 36 studies with 42 independent samples.
Mean effect sizes were small for employee attitudes and moderate for job performance
suggesting QCs affected job performance to a greater degree than employee attitudes.
60-15
Team Competencies: Relationships With Perceived Patient Care,
Effectiveness, and Attitudes
Andrea M. Olson, University of Minnesota
Amy R. Wasserman, Illinois Institute of Technology
Relationships between team competencies and six team outcomes were explored. Feedback
was the most important predictor of Perceived Patient Care Quality, Perceived Patient Care
Efficiency, and Overall Team Effectiveness. Communication was the most important predictor
of Individual Satisfaction and Individual Commitment. Orientation was the most important
predictor of Team Commitment.
60-16
Meta-Analysis and Path Model of Work Group
Diversity, Processes, and Outcomes
Sheila Simsarian Webber, George Mason University
Lisa M. Donahue, George Mason University
Meta-analysis of the relationship of work group diversity (readily detectable and less
observable) with cohesion and performance was conducted and then combined with the
meta-analytic findings of Gully, et al. (1995) of the relationship between cohesion and
performance to test an input-process-output model of the effects of diversity on work
group performance.
60-17
The Roles of Teamwork-KSAs and General Cognitive Ability in Different
Teams
Rowland P. Hanley, The Ohio University
Paula M. Popovich, The Ohio University
Peter Y. Chen, The Ohio University
Denise Haeggberg, The Ohio University
Scott Finlinson, The Ohio University
The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between type of team
and the instruments we use to predict performance. The Teamwork-KSA Test and tests of
general cognitive ability were assessed across two different team simulations. The
effectiveness of each test was dependent upon simulation type.
60-18
Group Cohesion and Group Effectiveness: A Causal Analysis
Todd W. Little, University of TennesseeKnoxville
This study was intended to estimate the reciprocal relationship between group cohesion
and group effectiveness at the group level. The sample consisted of 243 students working
in 65 groups. The reciprocal model was rejected and an exploratory analysis of a mediated
model was conducted. Results supported the mediated model.
60-19
Effects of Team Size on a Model of Team Performance
Anthony M. Townsend, University of Nevada at Las Vegas
W. Kevin Baker, Roanoke College
K. Dow Scott, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
The Garland (1985) goal/expectancy model is adapted to a team environment and used to
determine the impact of team size upon a complex team performance model. Analysis
indicates a robust model for all teams together, but that when tested among large and
small teams, the structure of the model changes.
60-20
Team Racial Composition, Member Attitudes, and Performance: A Field
Study
Anthony M. Townsend, University of Nevada at Las Vegas
K. Dow Scott, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Attitudinal, performance, and demographic data from 126 work teams are examined to
determine: (a) Does the racial composition of teams affects team performance; (b) Do
African Americans and whites have different attitudes toward their teams and their
teams performance, and (c) Do they explain performance differences in teams with
different racial composition?
60-21
A Multi-Dimensional Approach to the Group Cohesion and
Group Performance Relationship
Artemis Chang, University of Queensland
Prashant Bordia, University of Queensland
This study investigated the relationship between group level task and social cohesion
(Carron, 1985) and task effectiveness, system viability, and group members
professional growth (Hackman, 1990) over time. Results of this study suggested that task
cohesion was the only predictor of the self-rated performance and social cohesion was the
only predictor of system viability and group performance.
60-22
Team Creative Performance: The Effects of Characteristics of Individual
Team Members and Team Composition and Characteristics
Lucy L. Gilson, DuPree, Georgia Institute of Technology
Christina E. Shalley, Georgia Institute of Technology
Terry C. Blum, Georgia Institute of Technology
A field survey of intact self-managed teams found individual member characteristics
(i.e., creative personality and intrinsic motivation) and team characteristics (i.e.,
norms that support and reward creativity, shared goals, and democratic processes) were
positively related to team creative performance. Team size was negatively related to
creative performance.
60-23
Gender Differences in Negotiation Outcome: A Meta-Analysis
Alice F. Stuhlmacher, DePaul University
Amy E. Walters, DePaul University
Studies reporting the objective settlements obtained by male and female negotiators
were reviewed. Men negotiated significantly better outcomes than women. Opponent sex,
relative power, integrative potential, mode of communication and year of study were tested
as moderators although none of these or several exploratory moderators reversed or
eliminated the effect.
60-24
Individual Differences in Negotiation Effectiveness
Laura Gniatcyzk, University of TennesseeKnoxville
Debrah Z. Migetz, University of TennesseeKnoxville
Robert T. Ladd, University of TennesseeKnoxville
Negotiation is becoming an increasingly important skill necessary to compete in
todays business environment. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the
influences of individual differences on negotiation ability. Three types of individual
differences including gender, personality, and cognitive ability were examined. Mixed
findings for the proposed hypotheses are reported.
60-25
The Context of Accounts: Organizational Climate
and Ideological Justifications
Wayne Harrison, University of Nebraska at Omaha
Cheryl L. Hendrickson, American Institutes for Research
Information processing theory guided predictions regarding antecedents and consequences
of the perceived adequacy of ideological accounts. Participants (N = 216) in a
322 laboratory experiment engaged in an interactive scenario of university life.
Specific, but not vague, ideological justifications were effective across two outcome
severity levels, especially in a trusting climate.
60-26
Group Identity and Majority Influence in Negotiation
Erika Peterson, George Washington University
In group negotiations, agreements were less integrative when negotiators identified
with the group as a whole, rather than with their own party, particularly in negotiations
between majority and minority factions. Also, the majority faction had a greater profit
advantage over the minority faction when group identity was salient.
60-27
Negotiation at a Distance: Why You Might Want to Use the Telephone
Kenneth A. Graetz, University of Dayton
Cassie B. Barlow, U.S. Air Force
Nicole L. Proulx, University of Dayton
Laura A. Odenweller, University of Dayton
Simon Weierman, University of Dayton
Connie Blankenship, University of Dayton
Danielle Strazzo, University of Dayton
Same gender dyads engaged in a four-issue integrative bargaining task. Negotiator
accountability and communication channel (face-to-face, teleconferencing,
videoconferencing) were manipulated. Negotiators in the VC condition spent less time
negotiating, obtained lower outcomes overall, and engaged in less logrolling that dyads in
the other communication conditions. As predicted, negotiators in the TELE condition
performed relatively well in the absence of visual access.
60-28
Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Interpersonal
Conflict Handling Styles at the Team Level
DonnaMaria C. Vigil-King, University of Tennessee
This study assessed the validity of two ROCI-II variations, modified to reflect the
conflict-handling style used by individuals within teams and the conflict-handling style
used by the team. Confirmatory factor analysis results supported the five-factor
conflict-handling model for both variations. Interrater agreement (rwg)
indicated members evaluated team style similarly.
60-29
Prevalence of Workplace Violence Among Substance Abusers
Susan McFarlin, Old Dominion University
William Fals-Stewart, Old Dominion University
Debra A. Major, Old Dominion University
Timothy T. Freitas, Old Dominion University
We examined the prevalence of workplace violence among substance abusers entering
treatment. A significantly larger proportion of substance-abusing patients reported that
they had engaged in workplace violence in the year before treatment and in their lifetimes
than a sociodemographically matched sample of nonsubstance abusing individuals from the
community. Factors associated with workplace violence in these patients included sex, age,
and substance use frequency.
60-30
Examining the Role of Affect in Transformational Leadership
Lisa Keeping, University of Akron
Douglas J. Brown, University of Akron
To delineate the role of affect in transformational leadership as measured by the
Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, general affect and target-specific affect (liking of
ones supervisor) were modeled as method effects. Liking significantly altered both
the measurement of transformational leadership as well as structural relations between it
and three outcome variables.
60-31
Impact of Transformational Leadership Training on Follower Development
and Performance: A Field Experiment
Taly Dvir, Tel Aviv University
Dov Eden, Tel Aviv University
Bruce J. Avolio, SUNYBinghamton
Boas Shamir, Hebrew University
The causal relationships between transformational leadership, enhanced through
training, and follower development and performance were examined in a longitudinal true
field experiment. The results confirmed that the transformational leaders had a more
positive impact on their direct followers personal development and on their indirect
followers objective performance than the control leaders.
60-32
Construct Validity of Measures of Transformational Leader Behavior
Sally A. Carless, Monash University
The construct validity of two popular measures of transformational leadership were
examined. The instruments were the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ-5X; Avolio,
Bass, & Jung, 1995) and the Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI: Kouzes & Posner,
1988). LISREL 8 confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare three alternative models
of leadership: a first-order multidimensional model, a single factor model, and a
hierarchical model.
60-33
Female Leader Emergence: A Pattern Approach
Roseanne J. Foti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
University
Amy Gershenoff, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
A multi-variable pattern has been effective in predicting leadership emergence for
all-male groups. In all-female groups, individuals with a high, high, high, high pattern
of intelligence, dominance, general self-efficacy, and self-monitoring received higher
leadership ratings and rankings than all other individuals, extending these findings to
the female population.
60-34
Leader Assignment in Small Groups: Effects of Task Interdependence
Kevin J. Basik, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Amy Gershenoff, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Roseanne J. Foti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
This study examined the contingent nature of the leader assignment-task relationship.
High task interdependence with elected leaders resulted in high group performance, whereas
low task interdependence with assigned leaders resulted in high group performance. Results
demonstrated greater satisfaction with the group process and the leader in the high
interdependence condition.
60-35
Influence Tactics in Upward and Downward Attempts and
the Relations to Other Variables With Korean Samples
Jinkook Tak, Kwangwoon University
Upward influence tactics included eight factors whereas downward influence tactics
included nine factors. There were differences in the relative frequency of use between
upward and downward influence tactics. Personality traits were closely related to upward
influence tactics. Downward influence tactics were closely related to upward influence
tactics and organizational effectiveness.
60-36
Effects of Personal Outcomes and Success on Charisma and Influence
Oriel Strickland, California State UniversitySacramento
Carol J. MacMillan, California State UniversitySacramento
Mark Galimba, California State UniversitySacramento
This study examined the interactive effect of a leaders personal outcome and
prior success on perceptions of charisma, influence, and hiring decisions. Consistent with
hypotheses, a leader who is personally suffering is only perceived as charismatic and
influential when they also have been shown to be a successful influence agent.
60-37
Development of a Biodata Measure of Leadership
Effectiveness: A Life History Approach
Julia McElreath, Wayne State University
Alan R. Bass, Wayne State University
A life-history essay questionnaire was used to develop a biodata instrument to assess
leadership potential, based on a leadership-skills approach; the measure is intended for
career development and strategic staffing/succession planning. The life-history approach
yielded valuable data for biodata item generation, and demonstrated the usefulness of a
theory-based approach to item development.
60-38
HR Outsourcing and Its Impact: The Role of Transaction Costs
Brian S. Klaas, University of South Carolina
John McClendon, Temple University
Thomas W. Gainey, University of South Carolina
Organizations increasingly use outside contractors to perform HR activities
traditionally performed in-house. However, little is known about this interfirm alliance.
Using a Transaction Cost Economics perspective, this study found that several
organizational-level factors moderated the relationship between overall reliance on
outsourcing and the perceived benefits produced by this alternative.
60-39
Construction and Validation of a Measure of Resistance to Change
Tamara Pederson, Southern Illinois University
Catherine S. Daus, Southern Illinois University
Resistance to change is a subject of increasing importance in todays rapidly
changing workforce. Prior to making drastic changes, organizations need to identify
resistance in employees. This poster explains the development and construct validation of
a scale to measure resistance to change in employees in an organizational setting.
60-40
Measuring Compliance with Safety Behaviors at Work
Tara Smecko, Portland State University
Bob Hayes, Medical Consultants NW, Inc.
The present study describes the development and validation of a self-report measure of
compliance with safety behaviors at work. Results showed that the Work Safety Compliance
Measure (WSCM) reliably measures four facets of compliance with safety behaviors and was
significantly related to self-reported accident rates. Implications are discussed.
60-41
Organizational Innovation Through Human Resource
Management: A Structural Model
Annette Towler, Rice University
Steven C. Currall, Rice University
This theoretical paper explains how organizations can transform employee creativity
into organizational innovations through successful use of human resource management
practices and policies. Institutional polices such as management development facilitate
the harvest of employee creativity into organizational innovation. Ultimately,
organizational innovations enable an organization to obtain a competitive advantage.
60-42
An Investigation of Gender Influences on Job and Career Mobility:
What Interferes With Occupational Gravitation?
Bethany Klynn, The Ohio State University
Mary A. Roznowski, The Ohio State University
The present research investigates the gravitational hypothesis and seeks to understand
why men and women do not advance to upper levels of management at the same rate, despite
their similar levels of cognitive ability. Analyses show that life factors affect career
mobility differently for women and men.
60-43
Leadership in Adolescence: Comparing Peer and Teacher Perspectives
Mark Ehrhart, University of Maryland
Karen Holcombe, University of Maryland
Benjamin Schneider, University of Maryland
This study focuses on the predictability of adolescent leadership, with the goal of
establishing its durability into the work setting. Peer nominations of leadership were
predicted by a set of personal attributes. These nominations were related to, but distinct
from, teacher leadership ratings and peer nominations of popularity and friendship.
60-44
Relations of Leader Perceptions to Personality,
Leadership Style and Self-Schema
Jeann D. Makiney, University of Akron
Christopher A. Marchioro, University of Akron
Rosalie J. Hall, University of Akron
The relationships of the Big Five personality dimensions, leadership style (MLQ), and
leadership self-schema with leadership perceptions were examined. Personality alone
explained a significant amount of variance in perceptions and both the MLQ and Leadership
Self-Schema demonstrated meaningful increments over personality. Self-Schema explained
variance above both personality and leadership style.
60-45
Gender and Leader Behavior: Differences Exhibited
Leading a Production Simulation
Cheryl Dyer, Southwest Missouri State University
Carol F. Shoptaugh, Southwest Missouri State University
Thomas D. Kane, Southwest Missouri State University
Four categories of leader behavior (overall leader activity, leader activity solicited
by group members, motivating behaviors, and demotivating behaviors) were investigated in
this empirical examination of the relationship between gender and leaders verbal
behaviors. Only motivating behaviors significantly differentiated male from female
leaders.
60-46
Cart and Neural Network Tests of Schneiders (1987) Homogeneity
Hypothesis
Michael J. Keeney, University of Akron
Daniel J. Svyantek, University of Akron
Andrea F. Snell, University of Akron
Steven J. Robison, Dow Chemical Company
Measures of personality and organizational climate were subjected to two recently
available analytical methods that extract patterns from data, Classification and
Regression Trees, and neural network classification analysis. Risk, openness, rewards, and
neuroticism emerged as key variables in differentiating among three similar work groups.
Implications for ASA research are discussed.
60-47
Effects of Leader Personality on Entrepreneurial Firm Performance
Theresa M. Welbourne, Cornell University
Marcie A. Cavanaugh, Cornell University
Timothy A. Judge, University of Iowa
This studys purpose was to investigate the relationship between leader
personality ("Big Five") and firm performance. Using a longitudinal sample of
IPO firms, results indicated that leader emotional adjustment was positively associated
with earnings per share and stock price growth. Leader extraversion was negatively
associated with earnings per share.
60-48
Group Attendance and the Self-Reported Frequency of Absences
Amy E. Mills, Aon Consulting
Eugene F. Stone-Romero, University at Albany, SUNY
Few research studies have examined the construct validity of absence self-reports.
Thus, this study examined the relationship between group-level attendance and biases in
self-reports of ones own and others absences. Results support cognitive and
motivational predictions for biased self-reports.
61. Roundtable: Friday, 3:30 - 4:20 Sydney
Building Collaborative Relationships to Meet I-O Psychologists
Needs
Within State Organizations
This roundtable encourages discussion on providing the networking and continuing
education activities for I-O at the local level. We will summarize the activities
occurring in the state of Ohio through joint relationships with organizations including
the OPA as mandatory continuing education was implemented and collaboration with OH-IO and
other groups.
Thomas G. Baker, ESS Corp, Co-Host
Diana L. Clarke, Brinoth Group, Co-Host
62. Panel Discussion: Friday, 4:30 - 5:50 Imperial A
Moving HR Programs to the Field: Implementation Challenges and I-O
Responses
I-O practitioners must overcome many social, organizational, and environmental
challenges and constraints in order to effectively implement HR programs. Panelists with
extensive experience in moving HR programs to the field will discuss case studies and
offer perspectives on issues and challenges faced during the implementation of selection
programs.
Matthew R. Redmond, Aon Consulting, Chair
Steven T. Arneson, Pizza Hut, Inc., Panelist
Kelly J. Brookhouse, Motorola, Inc., Panelist
Michael E. Moomaw, The Southern Company, Panelist
Roland T. Ramsay, Ramsay Corporation, Panelist
Jim Livingston, International Paper, Panelist
63. Symposium: Friday, 4:30 - 5:50 Copenhagen
Revising a 360-Degree Feedback Instrument: Integrating
Quantitative and Qualitative Data
This symposium explores the process used to make content revisions to a 360-degree
multi-rater assessment instrument. Integrating both quantitative and qualitative
methodologies, the Center for Creative Leadership revised their Benchmarks instrument.
This symposium will discuss the dilemmas and practical implications of this type of work.
It will also explore the tradeoffs and business decisions made throughout the process.
Dana McDonald-Mann, Center for Creative Leadership, Chair
Christina A. Douglas, Center for Creative Leadership, A Content
Validation Approach to Revising Benchmarks
S. Bartholomew Craig, Center for Creative Leadership, Nambury S. Raju, Illinois
Institute of Technology, Using Item Response Theory to Update Benchmarks
Jean Leslie, Center for Creative Leadership, Putting It All Together:
Issues in Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Data
Marian N. Ruderman, Center for Creative Leadership, Silvia Swigert, Center for
Creative Leadership, Examination of the Differential Validity of Benchmark Scores
Stphane Brutus, Concordia University, Discussant
64. Roundtable: Friday, 4:30 - 5:50 Sydney
The Retention of "Welfare to Work" Employees
Recent welfare reform legislation and the shortage of workers have caused organizations
to look more closely at welfare recipients as viable candidates for employment. However,
issues surrounding retention of these employees have plagued organizations that attempt to
tap into this pool of candidates. I-O psychology needs to identify the ways in which it
can help in the retention of these employees.
Cristina G. Banks, Terranova Consulting Group, Co-Host
Katharine M. Jung, University of CaliforniaBerkeley/Terranova Consulting
Group, Co-Host
65. Symposium: Friday, 4:30 - 5:50 Intl Salon E
Person-Environment Fit: Alternative Conceptualizations
at Different Phases of Organizational Entry
Person-environment (P-E) fit is examined in one conceptual and three empirical papers.
The purpose of the symposium is to present various conceptualizations of P-E fit as it
occurs during pre-organizational entry, initial organizational entry, and
post-organizational entry. Conceptualizations of P-E fit include person-organization,
person-group, person-job, supplementary, complementary, comparative, and perceived fit.
Joan R. Rentsch, Wright State University, Chair
Amy L. Kristof-Brown, University of Iowa, Joyce Bono, University of Iowa,
Kristy J. Lauver, University of Iowa, A Multi-Dimensional Model of Socialization and
Person-Environment Fit
Daniel B. Turban, University of Missouri, Chung-Ming Lau, Chinese University of
Hong Kong, Irene H.S. Chow, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hang-Yue Ngo, Chinese
University of Hong Kong, Steven X. F. Si, Concordia University, Person-Organization
Fit in the Peoples Republic of China
Rosalie J. Hall, University of Akron, Anna Neumann, Arthur Andersen, P-E
Fit During Socialization: Relationships with Attitudinal and Performance Variables
Joan R. Rentsch, Wright State University, Darcy Menard, Wright State
University, Robert F. Scherer, Wright State University, The Effect of P-E Fit at
Post-Organizational Entry: Perception or Reality?
Benjamin Schneider, University of Maryland, Discussant
66. Special Event: Friday, 4:30 - 5:30 Intl Salon F
Reception: Ad Hoc Committee on Ethnic Minority Affairs
All conference participants are invited to attend a reception following a roundtable
discussion on ethnic minority issues. This is an excellent opportunity to meet others with
similar interests and to learn more about this ad hoc committee.
Beth Chung, Cornell University, Host
67. Roundtable: Friday, 4:30 - 5:50 Sydney
Doctoral Training in I-O Psychology: Are Team-Based Methods More
Effective?
This roundtable discussion will focus on the use of teams as a tool to facilitate the
training of I-O doctoral students as researchers. It is designed to create a dialogue
among participants regarding issues and factors that may need to be taken into
consideration before deciding whether or not to implement more formalized research
team-based structure in an I-O doctoral program.
Donna E. Thompson, Baruch College, CUNY, Co-Host
Elizabeth Manibay, Baruch College, CUNY, Co-Host
68. Special Event: Friday, 5:00 6:00 Hub
New Member Social Hour
All SIOP members are invited to attend the "New Member" Social Hour. Meet
new acquaintances, renew old ones, and learn more about SIOP in an informal and relaxed
atmosphere.
69. Symposium: Friday, 5:00 - 5:50 Intl Salon D
Human-Computer Communication Systems: Research and Applications
Innovations in information technology have created new opportunities in the way we
communicate, work, and learn. This symposium focuses on human-computer communication
systems in organizations and schools. Presentations describe research to further our
understanding of human-computer interaction, as well as novel applications of distributed
communication systems.
J. Philip Craiger, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Chair
Jack McGourty, Columbia University, Morton Friedman, Columbia University, The
Gateway Collaboratory at Columbia University: Enhancing Collaborative Behavior and
Innovation through Technology
Mary Hawkins, Bellevue University, J. Philip Craiger, University of Nebraska at
Omaha, Differential Effects of Feedback in Computer-Based Instruction
Karen Ury, Bowling Green State University, Steven Rogelberg, Bowling Green
State University, Explaining Individuals Anxiety In Using Electronic Mail For
Work-Related Tasks
Michael D. Coovert, University of South Florida, Discussant
Evening Reception 6:00 8:00 Skyline Level
Conference Table of Contents | Friday AM | Saturday AM | Saturday PM | Sunday | SIOP Home