Scott Elmes McIntyre
Instituto Superior da Maia
Castelo da Maia
4470 Maia
Portugal
e-mail: sem@ismai.pt
In this brief article, I would like to describe the current situation
of psychology in Portugal, along with the state of I-O psychology and some of the
challenges facing us here.
First a little background information. Portugal is a small country,
about the size of Indiana with a population of 10 million people. It is located on the
Iberian peninsula next to Spain with which it shares a common history. About half of the
population lives in the cities of Lisbon and Porto (Oporto) with an increasing influx of
people to the cities and the consequent abandonment of the interior of the country. This
creates a social conflict between the "modern" values (of which U.S. values as
presented by the media are dominant), and the "older, more conservative" ones.
For a half century, before the military revolution in 1974, Portugal was ruled by a
Fascist dictatorship. Since 1974, access to a university education has opened up with the
social sciences enjoying an increasingly important status in Portuguese society.
There are currently more than 5,000 psychologists in Portugal.
Psychology itself is a recent phenomenon, only really recognized as a profession after
1974 with the creation of psychological studies at the state-run universities. The
prestige of psychology has increased over the years and is now one of the most sought
after courses in the country. In terms of professionalization, there is still a long way
to go in comparison to other professional groups, especially those of the medical doctors.
One could say that the situation here, as far as psychology being professionalized, is
comparable to that in the U.S. about 30 years ago, with many specialty areas yet to be
defined and professional rights to be won.
I-O psychology is really just starting to develop and gain an identity
here. As in most of Europe, I-O is considered to be a subspecialty of social psychology,
therefore, in academia, one is recognized as being a social psychologist, not an I-O
psychologist. The label of I-O psychologist is usually used by people who have had a lot
of exposure to other countries, especially the U.S. It is rare to identify oneself as an
I-O psychologist. Usually, one is identified as an organizational psychologist (if at all)
and the industrial term is almost never used. The basic psychologist degree is a general
one. It requires 45 years of study, which includes a short internship in a specialty
area, and is called a licentiate. Currently, no university offers postgraduate courses in
I-O psychology, although a masters program is supposed to begin during the next
academic year (organizational psychology.).
There are very few professors in I-O psychology. In fact, to hire a
professor in I-O you would need to find someone who did the doctorate outside of the
country. Within the country, it is possible to identify a potential candidate with a
doctorate in social psychology, but specializing in organizations. In terms of the
marketplace, psychologists who have an interest in organizations work primarily in
recruiting and selection. They may do some consulting, but their activities are usually
limited to providing training solutions to companies. It is rare to be able to intervene
at an organizational level with top management with the traditional organizational
orientation. My experience as a consultant in Portugal is that consultation is usually
limited to providing training, but not as an integrated part of a comprehensive strategy
of human resource development. Also, consultants with advanced degrees, especially if they
are teaching at a university, are viewed with suspicion as being only
"theoretical" and "not understanding the real world." In business,
especially in the area of human resources, which would include selection and recruiting,
there is a lot of competition for jobs from other areas, such as organizational sociology
and human resource management and the psychology of work. I-O psychology is still not
widely understood, except perhaps in specific courses at the university, and
differentiating between psychology and these other disciplines has been difficult.
Psychological assessment for I-O purposes is problematic. There is a
great need for psychological tests that have been normed or developed for Portugal. Most
tests that are used are translated versions of tests from other countries, but they
usually have either not been normed or have been poorly-translated. Most selection
assessment tools consist of some basic psychological tests, the interview, and sometimes,
graphology. The areas of recruitment, selection, job assessment, personality inventories,
and so forth, still require much work to be done. As an example, the concept of
discrimination in hiring is very different from that of the U.S.. Here, discrimination by
age, handicap, looks, and so forth, is all quite legal, but very little research has been
done on showing how discriminatory practices affect hiring decisions and the resultant job
performance.
I came to Portugal in 1991 having taught for 3 years in the university
system, 2 years in a public university and 1 year in a private school. I am a professor in
the psychology department and the department of Management of Human Resources. As a
result, I teach organizational psychology to psychologists and to non-psychologists, which
is very interesting. Our university is only 7 years old and as a result we only offer
undergraduate courses. We plan to offer masters programs in the near future.
I am also the director of the university counseling center which has
just opened. We currently have three units in the center (Centro de Apoio e Servio
Psicolgico): Clinical/Health, Educational/Vocational, and Social/ Organizational. We
hope to use this as a training ground for our students, to provide services to the
community, and to do applied research. My interests, besides developing the center, will
be in providing services to organizations in terms of training, consulting, and research.
I would like to develop assessment tools, programs in teamwork, conflict management,
personality profiles, and so forth. We have great hopes for this center, especially in
terms of demonstrating the effectiveness of organizational psychologists.
I would welcome collaborating with people in the U.S. and in Europe in
a variety of areas, especially in developing assessment tools and the profession of
organizational psychology in this country.