An Expanded Scope for the Journal of Applied Psychology
Sheldon Zedeck
The Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) has changed hands;
beginning January 1, 2003, I will become the new editor, replacing Kevin
Murphy. In fact, as of January 1, 2002, the editorial board and I began
receiving manuscripts for review and possible publication as of 2003.
JAP has long been one of the primary journals devoted to contributing
new knowledge and understanding to the many fields of applied psychology
(excluding clinical and applied experimental/human factors, which are covered by
other American Psychological Association [APA] journals). The journal primarily
considers empirical and theoretical investigations of interest to psychologists
doing research or working in the private or public sector in such settings as
universities, for-profit and nonprofit organizations, industry, government, and
health and educational institutions. Two types of articles are published: (a)
feature articles, which are full-length articles that focus on an empirical
contribution (all research strategies and methods, quantitative and qualitative
[including case studies], are considered) or on a theoretical contribution that
has an applied emphasis, and (b) research reports, which are original in their
empirical or theoretical contribution but smaller or narrower in scope than a
feature article. Research reports can also feature important replications or
studies that discuss specific applications of psychology.
I plan to continue the fine tradition of JAP, while making some
changes such as considering qualitative research, including case studies;
publishing pieces that are primarily theoretical and conceptual; and encouraging
those who conduct basic research in fields such as cognition to consider the JAP
as an outlet for publishing the applied aspects of their results/conclusions. In
addition, we are hoping to attract more submissions from our colleagues outside
the Americas; we want to be attuned to the research conducted by psychologists
that is consistent with the globalization of the economy and the increased
interaction among world-wide organizations. Another consideration is to publish
special sections on specified topics. The latter would be accomplished by
announcing a call for papers on the topic with a specific deadline for
submission. Manuscripts would undergo normal review, but those accepted
would be published in a special section that would also include an
introduction and integration by a section editor.
The quality of the journal is substantially affected by the quality of the
Editorial Board. I believe that we have an excellent group of associate editors:
Jos Cortina, Beryl Hesketh, Jerry Kehoe, Jennifer
George, Katherine Klein, and Steve Kozlowski have been on
board since January 1, 2002; Lynn Shore will become an associate editor
as of January 1, 2003. In addition, we have approximately 85 distinguished
scholars as members of the Consulting Editorial Board and over 200 potential ad
hoc reviewers. Each day we add new ad hoc reviewers; those interested in serving
in such a role should contact me at japplied@socrates.berkeley.edu.
With respect to submitted manuscripts, the goals of the Editorial Board for
the review process, in addition to ones of quality, are (a) timeliness and (b)
constructive feedback. To accomplish these goals, in part, we are taking
advantage of APAs electronic submission and review system. You can find the
information about submissions on the APA Web site (www.apa.org) and then by
going to the Journal of Applied Psychology link. You can also go directly
to the JAP submissions portal at http://www.apa.org/journals/apl.html.
The electronic system allows you to track the history of the manuscript
(e.g., checking where it is in the review process) and allows the editors to
receive reviews from the reviewers as well as communicate with authors entirely
via the electronic system. No more need to send 5 paper copies!
Needless to say, the JAP requires that manuscripts follow APA
publication standards. Authors should prepare manuscripts according to the Publication
Manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Articles not
prepared according to the guidelines of the Publication Manual will not
be reviewed. All manuscripts must include an abstract containing a maximum of
120 words.
We are also requiring some consistency in reporting results. For the reader
to understand the importance of the research findings, authors should indicate
in the Results section of the manuscript the complete outcome of statistical
tests including significance levels, some index of effect size or strength of
relationship, and confidence intervals. See pp. 2026 of the Publication
Manual for a more detailed description of what should be reported in the
Results section of the manuscript.
Another point to emphasize, though it may be obvious to many, is that JAP
publishes articles pertaining to applied psychology. Any topic within the domain
of applied psychology is appropriate for consideration. To support this
position, we are asking that where there may be some doubt as to the applied
contribution of the research, the authors provide a paragraph or so that
describes the applied implications of the results of the research being
described.
Out of the 31 refereed journals that APA publishes, recent data (2001) show
that the JAP is first in number of manuscripts reviewed (over 500), tied
for third in shortest time for editorial reviews (7 weeks), fifth in number of
pages published (1,299 pages), and fourth in selectivity (16% acceptance rate). JAP
has established a fine historical track record, and we plan on continuing its
fine tradition. Last, but not least, we want to take this opportunity to
acknowledge the fine work of Kevin Murphy and his editorial board and thank them
for their service over the past 6 years. We look forward to carrying on the
tradition that they have enhanced and to maintaining JAP as the premiere
journal in the field.
October 2002 Table
of Contents | TIP Home
| SIOP Home