Home Home | About Us | Sitemap | Contact  
  • Info For
  • Professionals
  • Students
  • Educators
  • Media
  • Search
    Powered By Google

Sunday AM


_________________________________

Special Sunday morning programming has been selected on the topic of Crossing Disciplinary Boundaries. These eight themed sessions are marked with the following symbol: 

_________________________________

 

250. Special Event: Sunday, 8:009:50 Houston C (3rd floor-CC)


Crossing Disciplinary Boundaries: Insights for I-O Psychology Practice, Research, Teaching


Three distinguished scholars from outside the field of I-O psychology (engineering, educational psychology, and law) will discuss how their disciplines approach various research topics (safety, testing, worklife) studied by I-O psychologists. There will be an emphasis on how divergent fields can benefit from cross-disciplinary methods, theories, and perspectives.

 

Wendy R. Boswell, Texas A&M University, Chair

 

Sam Mannan, Texas A&M University, Measuring and Improving Safety Climate in the Chemical Process Industry

 

Ric Luecht, UNC-Greensboro, Engineering the Test: Principled Item Design to Automated Test Assembly

 

Joan C. Williams, UC Hastings College of Law, The Material Wall: Workplace Bias Triggered by Family Care-Giving Responsibilities

 

Richard J. Klimoski, George Mason University, Discussant

 



264. Practice Forum: Sunday, 10:3011:50 San Antonio A (3rd floor-CC)


Expanding our influence: How I-O Psychologists Can Improve Education


In this session, we present different perspectives on using I-O psychology to improve teaching and schools. Much research needs to be done on this subject, and we believe that I-O can play an integral role in it. As such, we discuss the advantages and challenges of this nontraditional area.


Mark Alan Smith, American Institutes for Research, Chair


Alexander Alonso, Florida International University, Using I-O Psychology to Measure Teacher Knowledge and Performance


Mark Alan Smith, American Institutes for Research, David P. Baker, American Institutes for Research, Mary Ann Hanson, Center for Career and Community Research, Using Job Analysis to Improve Education and Future Workforce Development


Michael T. Brannick, University of South Florida, Walter C. Borman, Personnel Decisions Research Institutes, Andrea L. Sinclair, HumRRO, Using I-O Psychology to Address Practical Issues in Student Assessments


Rodney A. McCloy, HumRRO, Heather Meikle, University of South Florida, Using I-O Psychology to Help Schools Build the Technical Workforce


Mary Ann Hanson, Center for Career and Community Research, Kathryn M. Borman, University of South Florida, Reginald Lee, University of South Florida, Will Tyson, University of South Florida, Ted Micceri, University of South Florida, Tracy E. Costigan, American Institutes for Research, An Alternative View of I-O Psychology in Education


Lauress Wise, Human Resources Research Organization (HumRRO), Discussant


Submitted by Mark Alan Smith, msmith@air.org

 


265. Panel Discussion: Sunday, 10:3011:50 San Antonio B (3rd floor-CC)


Strategic and Interdisciplinary Use of Internship Opportunities for Organizational Effectiveness


This unique panel discussion brings together internship providers and interns to explore how internship experiences allow organizations to strategically utilize interns knowledge and training for competitive advantage, and how the activities and experiences that interns have had that have allowed them to become strategic resources for the organization.


Mark C. Frame, University of Texas at Arlington, Chair


Melissa J. Sargent, NASA, Kennedy Space Center, Co-Chair


Joel Bennett, Organizational Wellness & Learning Systems, Panelist


William David Rigdon, University of Texas at Arlington, Panelist


Katherine Roberto, University of Texas at Arlington, Panelist


Melissa J. Sargent, NASA, Kennedy Space Center, Panelist


A. Dale Thompson, Leadership Worth Following, PLLC, Panelist


Satoris S. Youngcourt, Personnel Decisions International, Panelist


Submitted by Mark C. Frame, Frame@uta.edu

 


266. Theoretical Advancement: Sunday, 10:3011:50 Houston A (3rd floor-CC)


Evolutionary I-O Psychology: Empirical Studies in Decision Making, Leadership, Personality


Evolutionary psychology is leading to new insights across much of psychology and has recently begun to enter I-O psychology. This symposium features empirical papers by researchers who are integrating evolutionary psychology theory into studies of longstanding I-O questions in decision making, leadership, and personality.


Donald A. Hantula, Temple University, Chair


Donald A. Hantula, Temple University, Foraging Theory and its Implications for Decision Making in Organizations


Richard D. Arvey, University of Minnesota, Behavioral Genetics and Organizational Psychology


Stephen M. Colarelli, Central Michigan University, Kyunghee Han, Central Michigan University, Guangrong Dai, Central Michigan University, Richard Sheppard, Central Michigan University, Evolved Adaptations and Sex and Race Measurement Bias in Personality Inventories


Submitted by Donald A. Hantula, hantula@temple.edu

 


267. Symposium: Sunday, 10:3011:50 Houston B (3rd floor-CC)


Applying the Social Network Approach to I-O Psychology


Social network theory and methods have been applied to a wide range of organizational topics across various levels of analysis. However, the field of I-O psychology has paid limited attention to the network approach until recently. The purpose of this symposium is to enhance researchers awareness of social network studies.


Lili Duan, University of Maryland, Chair


Daniel A. Newman, Texas A&M University, Co-Chair


Anu Ramesh, University of Maryland, Lynne M. Waldera, InMomentum, Inc., Perceived Assets and Liabilities of Network Centrality Following Organizational Change


Craig L. Pearce, Claremont Graduate University, Shared Leadership and Social Networks


Lili Duan, University of Maryland, Michele J. Gelfand, University of Maryland, Understanding Leadership Through Guanxi Networks: A Chinese Perspective


Jonathan Pinto, University of Pittsburgh, Selecting Members of the Network Organization


Andrew J. Slaughter, Texas A&M University, Daniel A. Newman, Texas A&M University, Janie Yu, Texas A&M University, Laura M. Koehly, National Institutes of Health, Alternative Measurement of Cognitive Social Structures: Indexing Demographic Bias


Katherine J. Klein, University of Pennsylvania, Discussant


Submitted by Daniel A. Newman, d5n@tamu.edu

 


268. Practice Forum: Sunday, 10:3011:50 Houston C (3rd floor-CC)


Multiphase and Single-Phase Management Models: A Comparison of Traditional and Tribal Management Processes


In our work with tribal-run gaming organizations, we have observed management differences that provide striking contrasts to those of traditional operations. Results of these studies will interest all who consult in organizations, for the new insights and understanding provided, as well as the questions raised about traditional approaches.


Billie G. Blair, Leading and Learning, Inc., Chair


John E. Langhorne, Langhorne Associates, Working Within a Culture Where the Decision Making is Tribal not Traditional


Billie G. Blair, Leading and Learning, Inc., Multiphase Management Processes: A Model


Larry Miranda, Pechanga Resort and Casino, Discussion of the Multiphase Management Model: Realities of Tribal Leadership Applied to Traditional Expectations


Walton A. Henderson, Leading and Learning, Inc., Facilitating Key Business Change Issues Within the Leadership Structure of Tribal Operations


Larry Miranda, Pechanga Resort and Casino, Discussant


Submitted by Billie G. Blair, blair@leadingandlearninginc.com

 


269. Symposium: Sunday, 10:3011:50 Austin 1 (2nd floor-H)


Bringing the Implicit Personality Into I-O Psychology


Research has focused on explicit personality, as commonly assessed by self-reports. However, the indirect measurement used to assess implicit personality (e.g., conditional reasoning) has shown efficacy in explaining organizational behavior. This symposium features the integration of implicit and explicit personality and the contributions of this integration to theory and practice.


James M. LeBreton, Wayne State University, Chair


Lawrence R. James, Georgia Tech, Integrating the Implicit With the Explicit Personality


Brian Frost, Independent Contractor, A Test of the Channeling Hypothesis/Integrative Model of Aggression


Chia-Huei Emily Ko, Georgia Institute of Technology, Matthew K. Minton, Georgia Institute of Technology, Testing Models for the Relationship Between Implicit and Explicit Personality


Chris J. Sablynski, California State University-Sacramento, Terence R. Mitchell, University of Washington, Post-Hoc Analyses of Interactions Between the Aggression Questionnaire and Conditional Reasoning Test of Aggression


Paul J. Hanges, University of Maryland, Discussant


Submitted by Chia-Huei Emily Ko, chiahuei.ko@psych.gatech.edu

 


273. Roundtable: Sunday, 10:3011:20 Majestic 6 (37th floor-H)


Use of Time Series in Leadership Research


Time series analysis (TSA) has a history in such fields as clinical, social, and child psychology, but leadership researchers have not used it despite a common call for longitudinal studies. This interactive session focuses on conceptual foundations of TSA, leadership applications, and potential solutions to TSAs practical constraints.


Karin Klenke, Regent University, Host


Robert M. McIntyre, United States Navy, Co-Host


Judith Johnson, Regent University, Co-Host


Submitted by Karin Klenke, karikle@regent.edu

 




Program Table of Contents