Home Home | About Us | Sitemap | Contact  
  • Info For
  • Professionals
  • Students
  • Educators
  • Media
  • Search
    Powered By Google

Sunday AM


Special Sunday morning programming has been selected on the topic of Crossing Disciplinary Boundaries. These eight themed sessions are marked with the following symbol: 



250. Special Event: Sunday, 8:009:50 Houston C (3rd floor-CC)

Crossing Disciplinary Boundaries: Insights for I-O Psychology Practice, Research, Teaching

Three distinguished scholars from outside the field of I-O psychology (engineering, educational psychology, and law) will discuss how their disciplines approach various research topics (safety, testing, worklife) studied by I-O psychologists. There will be an emphasis on how divergent fields can benefit from cross-disciplinary methods, theories, and perspectives.


Wendy R. Boswell, Texas A&M University, Chair


Sam Mannan, Texas A&M University, Measuring and Improving Safety Climate in the Chemical Process Industry


Ric Luecht, UNC-Greensboro, Engineering the Test: Principled Item Design to Automated Test Assembly


Joan C. Williams, UC Hastings College of Law, The Material Wall: Workplace Bias Triggered by Family Care-Giving Responsibilities


Richard J. Klimoski, George Mason University, Discussant


264. Practice Forum: Sunday, 10:3011:50 San Antonio A (3rd floor-CC)

Expanding our influence: How I-O Psychologists Can Improve Education

In this session, we present different perspectives on using I-O psychology to improve teaching and schools. Much research needs to be done on this subject, and we believe that I-O can play an integral role in it. As such, we discuss the advantages and challenges of this nontraditional area.

Mark Alan Smith, American Institutes for Research, Chair

Alexander Alonso, Florida International University, Using I-O Psychology to Measure Teacher Knowledge and Performance

Mark Alan Smith, American Institutes for Research, David P. Baker, American Institutes for Research, Mary Ann Hanson, Center for Career and Community Research, Using Job Analysis to Improve Education and Future Workforce Development

Michael T. Brannick, University of South Florida, Walter C. Borman, Personnel Decisions Research Institutes, Andrea L. Sinclair, HumRRO, Using I-O Psychology to Address Practical Issues in Student Assessments

Rodney A. McCloy, HumRRO, Heather Meikle, University of South Florida, Using I-O Psychology to Help Schools Build the Technical Workforce

Mary Ann Hanson, Center for Career and Community Research, Kathryn M. Borman, University of South Florida, Reginald Lee, University of South Florida, Will Tyson, University of South Florida, Ted Micceri, University of South Florida, Tracy E. Costigan, American Institutes for Research, An Alternative View of I-O Psychology in Education

Lauress Wise, Human Resources Research Organization (HumRRO), Discussant

Submitted by Mark Alan Smith, msmith@air.org


265. Panel Discussion: Sunday, 10:3011:50 San Antonio B (3rd floor-CC)

Strategic and Interdisciplinary Use of Internship Opportunities for Organizational Effectiveness

This unique panel discussion brings together internship providers and interns to explore how internship experiences allow organizations to strategically utilize interns knowledge and training for competitive advantage, and how the activities and experiences that interns have had that have allowed them to become strategic resources for the organization.

Mark C. Frame, University of Texas at Arlington, Chair

Melissa J. Sargent, NASA, Kennedy Space Center, Co-Chair

Joel Bennett, Organizational Wellness & Learning Systems, Panelist

William David Rigdon, University of Texas at Arlington, Panelist

Katherine Roberto, University of Texas at Arlington, Panelist

Melissa J. Sargent, NASA, Kennedy Space Center, Panelist

A. Dale Thompson, Leadership Worth Following, PLLC, Panelist

Satoris S. Youngcourt, Personnel Decisions International, Panelist

Submitted by Mark C. Frame, Frame@uta.edu


266. Theoretical Advancement: Sunday, 10:3011:50 Houston A (3rd floor-CC)

Evolutionary I-O Psychology: Empirical Studies in Decision Making, Leadership, Personality

Evolutionary psychology is leading to new insights across much of psychology and has recently begun to enter I-O psychology. This symposium features empirical papers by researchers who are integrating evolutionary psychology theory into studies of longstanding I-O questions in decision making, leadership, and personality.

Donald A. Hantula, Temple University, Chair

Donald A. Hantula, Temple University, Foraging Theory and its Implications for Decision Making in Organizations

Richard D. Arvey, University of Minnesota, Behavioral Genetics and Organizational Psychology

Stephen M. Colarelli, Central Michigan University, Kyunghee Han, Central Michigan University, Guangrong Dai, Central Michigan University, Richard Sheppard, Central Michigan University, Evolved Adaptations and Sex and Race Measurement Bias in Personality Inventories

Submitted by Donald A. Hantula, hantula@temple.edu


267. Symposium: Sunday, 10:3011:50 Houston B (3rd floor-CC)

Applying the Social Network Approach to I-O Psychology

Social network theory and methods have been applied to a wide range of organizational topics across various levels of analysis. However, the field of I-O psychology has paid limited attention to the network approach until recently. The purpose of this symposium is to enhance researchers awareness of social network studies.

Lili Duan, University of Maryland, Chair

Daniel A. Newman, Texas A&M University, Co-Chair

Anu Ramesh, University of Maryland, Lynne M. Waldera, InMomentum, Inc., Perceived Assets and Liabilities of Network Centrality Following Organizational Change

Craig L. Pearce, Claremont Graduate University, Shared Leadership and Social Networks

Lili Duan, University of Maryland, Michele J. Gelfand, University of Maryland, Understanding Leadership Through Guanxi Networks: A Chinese Perspective

Jonathan Pinto, University of Pittsburgh, Selecting Members of the Network Organization

Andrew J. Slaughter, Texas A&M University, Daniel A. Newman, Texas A&M University, Janie Yu, Texas A&M University, Laura M. Koehly, National Institutes of Health, Alternative Measurement of Cognitive Social Structures: Indexing Demographic Bias

Katherine J. Klein, University of Pennsylvania, Discussant

Submitted by Daniel A. Newman, d5n@tamu.edu


268. Practice Forum: Sunday, 10:3011:50 Houston C (3rd floor-CC)

Multiphase and Single-Phase Management Models: A Comparison of Traditional and Tribal Management Processes

In our work with tribal-run gaming organizations, we have observed management differences that provide striking contrasts to those of traditional operations. Results of these studies will interest all who consult in organizations, for the new insights and understanding provided, as well as the questions raised about traditional approaches.

Billie G. Blair, Leading and Learning, Inc., Chair

John E. Langhorne, Langhorne Associates, Working Within a Culture Where the Decision Making is Tribal not Traditional

Billie G. Blair, Leading and Learning, Inc., Multiphase Management Processes: A Model

Larry Miranda, Pechanga Resort and Casino, Discussion of the Multiphase Management Model: Realities of Tribal Leadership Applied to Traditional Expectations

Walton A. Henderson, Leading and Learning, Inc., Facilitating Key Business Change Issues Within the Leadership Structure of Tribal Operations

Larry Miranda, Pechanga Resort and Casino, Discussant

Submitted by Billie G. Blair, blair@leadingandlearninginc.com


269. Symposium: Sunday, 10:3011:50 Austin 1 (2nd floor-H)

Bringing the Implicit Personality Into I-O Psychology

Research has focused on explicit personality, as commonly assessed by self-reports. However, the indirect measurement used to assess implicit personality (e.g., conditional reasoning) has shown efficacy in explaining organizational behavior. This symposium features the integration of implicit and explicit personality and the contributions of this integration to theory and practice.

James M. LeBreton, Wayne State University, Chair

Lawrence R. James, Georgia Tech, Integrating the Implicit With the Explicit Personality

Brian Frost, Independent Contractor, A Test of the Channeling Hypothesis/Integrative Model of Aggression

Chia-Huei Emily Ko, Georgia Institute of Technology, Matthew K. Minton, Georgia Institute of Technology, Testing Models for the Relationship Between Implicit and Explicit Personality

Chris J. Sablynski, California State University-Sacramento, Terence R. Mitchell, University of Washington, Post-Hoc Analyses of Interactions Between the Aggression Questionnaire and Conditional Reasoning Test of Aggression

Paul J. Hanges, University of Maryland, Discussant

Submitted by Chia-Huei Emily Ko, chiahuei.ko@psych.gatech.edu


273. Roundtable: Sunday, 10:3011:20 Majestic 6 (37th floor-H)

Use of Time Series in Leadership Research

Time series analysis (TSA) has a history in such fields as clinical, social, and child psychology, but leadership researchers have not used it despite a common call for longitudinal studies. This interactive session focuses on conceptual foundations of TSA, leadership applications, and potential solutions to TSAs practical constraints.

Karin Klenke, Regent University, Host

Robert M. McIntyre, United States Navy, Co-Host

Judith Johnson, Regent University, Co-Host

Submitted by Karin Klenke, karikle@regent.edu


Program Table of Contents