Home Home | About Us | Sitemap | Contact  
  • Info For
  • Professionals
  • Students
  • Educators
  • Media
  • Search
    Powered By Google

Revision of the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing Completed

Dianne Brown Maranto
The Maranto Group

The revision of the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing is now complete and the new book is available from SIOP, at a discount to SIOP members (look for the ad in this TIP). In addition to reflecting more current measurement technology and policy, the 1999 Standards differs from 1985 in a number of ways. First, there is more prefatory or introductory text at the beginning of each chapter, as well as more standards. Second, the standards are not categorized with hierarchical labels like "primary," "secondary" or "conditional" as with previous versions. Instead, conditional statements are included in the text of the standards. Finally, the glossary and index are significantly expanded.

Summary of Revision Project

The Standards revision process was rigorous and diligent in seeking input from the broad measurement community. The presidents of the American Psychological Association (APA), the American Educational Research Association (AERA), and the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) appointed a 15 member Committee in 1993, assembling a group with diverse backgrounds and perspectives in testing and assessment. The project began in the fall of 1993, and the Joint Committee had its last meeting in November, 1998. Although it may seem like a long time, previous revisions also reportedly took 5 to 7 years. This revision effort began somewhat late, 8 years after publication of the 1985 edition. Draft versions of the Standards were widely distributed for public review and comment three times during this revision effort, providing the Committee with a total of nearly 8,000 pages of comments from over 200 organizations and individuals. An extensive legal review was conducted as a routine part of the process of developing standards and explored both liability issues, as well as compatibility with relevant federal law. The final product represents a consensus of the Committee and endorsement of each of the sponsoring organizations: APA, AERA and NCME.

Thank You Paul Sackett, Jo-Ida Hansen, and Bert Green

I-O psychologists owe a great debt of gratitude to Paul Sackett for his contribution to the Standards, both as an I-O psychologist and as a leader of the project. The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing has been co-developed by APA, AERA, and NCME since the first joint version in 1966. The original impetus for collaborating was the recognition that measurement principles are the same whether in education or psychology. As time has passed and testing has become more prevalent in many diverse areas of society, and as legislation and policy have had different effects on the various uses of tests, the commonality of measurement principles seems more elusive than before. Newer ways of conceptualizing validity or the Americans with Disabilities Act can be interpreted in widely different ways for different applications of testing. This was not an easy interdisciplinary collaboration and Paul represented our field well. While not meaning to neglect or diminish the contributions of other committee members, two others also contributed significantly to the representation and coverage of I-O and related areas of testing. We owe a special thanks to Bert Green and Jo-Ida Hansen.

 


January 2000 Table of Contents | TIP Home | SIOP Home